dc.creator | Botega, N J | |
dc.creator | Bio, M R | |
dc.creator | Zomignani, M A | |
dc.creator | Garcia, C | |
dc.creator | Pereira, W A | |
dc.date | 1995-Oct | |
dc.date | 2015-11-27T12:18:40Z | |
dc.date | 2015-11-27T12:18:40Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-29T00:51:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-29T00:51:39Z | |
dc.identifier | Revista De Saúde Pública. v. 29, n. 5, p. 355-63, 1995-Oct. | |
dc.identifier | 0034-8910 | |
dc.identifier | | |
dc.identifier | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8731275 | |
dc.identifier | http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/193876 | |
dc.identifier | 8731275 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1294109 | |
dc.description | The revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale were used to estimate the prevalence of mood disorders among 78 consecutive admissions to a general medical ward in a university general hospital in Brazil (43 males and 35 females; mean age = 43.2yr). Interviewers also completed a 5-point symptom severity scales for anxiety and depression. The definition of cases of anxiety [and depression] was based on two criteria: a. score > or = 2 on the CIS-R section of anxiety [> or = 4 on the CIS-R sections of depression and depressive ideas]; and b. score > or = 2 on the clinical severity scale for anxiety [score > or = 2 on the clinical severity scale for depression]. A 39% prevalence rate of affective disorders was found. Sixteen (20.5%) patients met criteria for anxiety, most of the disorders being of mild severity. Twenty-sic patients (33%) were depressed, 7 of them in a moderate degree. The HAD was easily understood by the patients. Anxiety and depression subscales had internal consistency of 0.68 and 0.77, respectively. At a cut-off point of 8/9 sensibility and specificity were 93.7% and 72.6% for anxiety, and 84.6% and 90.3% for depression. HAD items correlated positively with the respective subscales. To a lesser degree, they also correlated with the alternative subscale. Our findings confirm the high prevalence of mood disorders among medical in-patients. In clinical practice, the HAD may have a useful role in detecting those patients requiring further psychological care. | |
dc.description | 29 | |
dc.description | 355-63 | |
dc.language | por | |
dc.relation | Revista De Saúde Pública | |
dc.relation | Rev Saude Publica | |
dc.rights | aberto | |
dc.rights | | |
dc.source | PubMed | |
dc.subject | Adolescent | |
dc.subject | Adult | |
dc.subject | Aged | |
dc.subject | Aged, 80 And Over | |
dc.subject | Anxiety | |
dc.subject | Cross-sectional Studies | |
dc.subject | Depression | |
dc.subject | Female | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Inpatients | |
dc.subject | Male | |
dc.subject | Middle Aged | |
dc.subject | Mood Disorders | |
dc.subject | Psychiatric Status Rating Scales | |
dc.subject | Questionnaires | |
dc.subject | Sampling Studies | |
dc.title | [mood Disorders Among Inpatients In Ambulatory And Validation Of The Anxiety And Depression Scale Had]. | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |