dc.creatorFernandes, JIM
dc.creatorLima, FR
dc.creatorMendonca, CX
dc.creatorMabe, I
dc.creatorAlbuquerque, R
dc.creatorLeal, PM
dc.date1999
dc.dateDEC
dc.date2014-12-02T16:27:41Z
dc.date2015-11-26T18:08:02Z
dc.date2014-12-02T16:27:41Z
dc.date2015-11-26T18:08:02Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:50:09Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:50:09Z
dc.identifierPoultry Science. Poultry Science Assoc Inc, v. 78, n. 12, n. 1729, n. 1736, 1999.
dc.identifier0032-5791
dc.identifierWOS:000084413600012
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/70809
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/70809
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/70809
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1293730
dc.descriptionNine hundred fifty male Hubbard chicks were used in a 21-d study (10 birds per battery cage) to determine:relative bioavailability of P (RBP) in four feed-grade phosphates (FP) [two Brazilian dicalcium and two U.S.-made phosphates (di-monocalcium and defluorinated)] and four Brazilian agricultural grade phosphates (AP) [single (AP-1), and triple (AP-2) superphosphates, monoammonium (AP-3), and thermomagnesium (AP-4) phosphates]. The reference standard was a purified-grade calcium phosphate dibasic (SP). Phosphates were added to the corn-soybean control diet (22% protein; 0.40% P + 0.08% P from SP), providing 0.08 and 0.16% additional P. Calcium level was 1.0% for all diets. Slope ratio was used to determine REP, with BW, bone ash (BA), or bone strength (BS) regressed on P added within each P source. A relative biological value (RBV) was estimated using BW, BAI and feed efficiency. Performance was depressed (P <0.01) by AP as compared with FP; BW was decreased by 11%, and feed intake (FI) was decreased by 14%. Mortality increased (P < 0.05) by 154% (7 vs 2.8%). Phosphate source:AP-4, which had the lowest content of P and a high content of F, Fe, Ba, Ti, and Th, was toxic based on a 44% decrease (P < 0.01) in BW, 46% decrease in Fl, 19% decrease in BA (32.4 vs 40.0%), 55% decrease in BS (7.1 vs 15.8 kg), and mortality increase (P < 0.05) from 0.7 to 26% compared with the average of AP-1, -2 and -3. The REP could not be estimated for AP-4; and average availabilities for FP and AP, respectively, were 100.6 and 107.6% (BW), 88.3 and 93.2% (BA), 84.2 and 96.3% (BS), and 100.0 and 99.9% (RBP). The AP varied in REP, with particularly high values calculated for AP-3. Performance and bone parameters in this study were not strongly affected by high levels of potentially toxic mineral elements in certain AP; this result may be explained by the low levels of phosphate addition and the short duration of the-feeding period (21 d). However, considering their relatively high levels of F, Fe, Mg, S, Ba, Ti, and Th, agricultural-grade phosphate may represent considerable risk of toxicity for use in animal diets.
dc.description78
dc.description12
dc.description1729
dc.description1736
dc.languageen
dc.publisherPoultry Science Assoc Inc
dc.publisherSavoy
dc.publisherEUA
dc.relationPoultry Science
dc.relationPoult. Sci.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectagricultural grade phosphate
dc.subjectfeed-grade phosphate
dc.subjectphosphorus availability
dc.subjectbroiler
dc.subjectCommercial Dicalcium Phosphates
dc.subjectChicks
dc.subjectAvailability
dc.subjectTurkeys
dc.titleRelative bioavailability of phosphorus in feed and agricultural phosphates for poultry
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución