dc.creatorGomes, CR
dc.creatorVissotto, FZ
dc.creatorFadini, AL
dc.creatorde Faria, EV
dc.creatorLuiz, AM
dc.date2007
dc.dateJUL-SEP
dc.date2014-11-19T17:39:52Z
dc.date2015-11-26T18:04:46Z
dc.date2014-11-19T17:39:52Z
dc.date2015-11-26T18:04:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:46:57Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:46:57Z
dc.identifierCiencia E Tecnologia De Alimentos. Soc Brasileira Ciencia Tecnologia Alimentos, v. 27, n. 3, n. 614, n. 623, 2007.
dc.identifier0101-2061
dc.identifierWOS:000254832700030
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/60254
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/60254
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/60254
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1292951
dc.descriptionA study was made of various bulk agents as sucrose substitutes in the formulation of chocolate, aiming to obtain a diet product in terms of sucrose and a light product in terms of calories (25% fewer calories than standard formulations containing sucrose) with good sensorial acceptance. The bulk agents used in this study were polydextrose, inulin, fructo-oligosaccharides - FOS, lactitol and maltitol. Sucralose was used as a high intensity sweetener. The light chocolates were analyzed for moisture content (Karl Fischer), particle size (digital micrometer), and rheological properties (Casson plastic viscosity eta(ca), and yield strength, tau(ca)). The moisture content of the light chocolate varied from 1.23 to 2.12%, while particle size varied from 19 to 24 mu m, eta(ca) from 6.60 to 11.00 Pa.s, and tau(ca) from 0.05 to 1.10 Pa. The formulations containing polydextrose, polydextrose and lactitol, and polydextrose and maltitol were selected for a sensory analysis due to their good technological performance and adequate machinability of the chocolate mass in the different stages of the process. The sensory analysis revealed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in the three evaluated formulations in terms of aroma, hardness, melting in the mouth and flavor. There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in the intention to purchase the three chocolate formulations, although a preference was shown for the formulation containing polydextrose (32.60%) and maltitol (15.57%).
dc.description27
dc.description3
dc.description614
dc.description623
dc.languagept
dc.publisherSoc Brasileira Ciencia Tecnologia Alimentos
dc.publisherCampinas
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.relationCiencia E Tecnologia De Alimentos
dc.relationCiencia Tecnol. Aliment.
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectlight
dc.subjectdiet
dc.subjectchocolate
dc.subjectbulking agents
dc.subjectrheology
dc.subjectsensory analysis
dc.titleInfluence of different bulk agents in the rheological and sensory characteristics of diet and light chocolate
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución