dc.creatorCianciaruso, MV
dc.creatorSilva, IA
dc.creatorManica, LT
dc.creatorSouza, JP
dc.date2013
dc.dateAUG
dc.date2014-08-01T18:33:54Z
dc.date2015-11-26T18:03:11Z
dc.date2014-08-01T18:33:54Z
dc.date2015-11-26T18:03:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:45:00Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:45:00Z
dc.identifierBasic And Applied Ecology. Elsevier Gmbh, Urban & Fischer Verlag, v. 14, n. 5, n. 404, n. 412, 2013.
dc.identifier1439-1791
dc.identifierWOS:000321497300005
dc.identifier10.1016/j.baae.2013.05.002
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/80813
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/80813
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1292457
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionPlant species with a high leaf life span (LLS) commonly have a low specific leaf area (SLA), leaf nitrogen per unit mass (N), and phosphorous concentration (P), whereas species with low LLS have a high SLA, N and P. However, LLS tends to be longer in species growing in low-nutrient soils and, therefore, differences in LLS and other leaf traits may not be consistent with a plant classification according to leaf habit. Here we investigated whether leaf habit is consistent with leaf economic spectrum trade-offs in cerrado (a Neotropical savanna) woody species. We analyzed the SLA, N and P of 125 woody species with a distinct leaf habit (deciduous, semideciduous, brevideciduous or evergreen). We also gathered data on the LLS (33 species), maximum net photosynthesis per leaf area (A(area), 56 species) and per leaf mass (A(mass), 31 species), comprising the most extensive database analyzed so far for the cerrado. Differences among leaf habit groups were tested using generalized linear mixed models and ANOVA. We did not find differences in SLA and N among species with a distinct leaf habit, but deciduous species had a higher leaf P concentration than evergreens. Species did not differ in LLS and A(mass), but A(area) varied among groups. Semideciduous species had higher A(area) values than deciduous and brevideciduous species, but all other groups had similar A(area) values. Because of the small difference in the LLS, SLA, leaf N, leaf P and maximum net photosynthesis, we argue that deciduous, brevideciduous, semideciduous and evergreen species may not constitute different functional groups in cerrado woody species.
dc.description14
dc.description5
dc.description404
dc.description412
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionFAPEG [006/2009]
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionCNPq [478747/2009-8]
dc.descriptionFAPEG [006/2009]
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier Gmbh, Urban & Fischer Verlag
dc.publisherJena
dc.publisherAlemanha
dc.relationBasic And Applied Ecology
dc.relationBasic Appl. Ecol.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectCerrado
dc.subjectDeciduousness
dc.subjectLeaf life span
dc.subjectSeasonality
dc.subjectSpecific leaf area
dc.subjectTrade-offs
dc.subjectNeotropical Savanna Trees
dc.subjectLife-span
dc.subjectSoutheastern Brazil
dc.subjectMato-grosso
dc.subjectVegetation
dc.subjectPlant
dc.subjectPhenology
dc.subjectPatterns
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectWater
dc.titleLeaf habit does not predict leaf functional traits in cerrado woody species
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución