dc.creatorDe Leo, S
dc.creatorDucat, G
dc.creatorRotelli, P
dc.date2000
dc.dateOCT 30
dc.date2014-12-02T16:27:31Z
dc.date2015-11-26T18:03:06Z
dc.date2014-12-02T16:27:31Z
dc.date2015-11-26T18:03:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:44:53Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:44:53Z
dc.identifierModern Physics Letters A. World Scientific Publ Co Pte Ltd, v. 15, n. 33, n. 2057, n. 2068, 2000.
dc.identifier0217-7323
dc.identifierWOS:000166460100007
dc.identifier10.1142/S0217732300002395
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/70875
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/70875
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/70875
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1292430
dc.descriptionThe standard formula for mass oscillations is often based upon the approximation t approximate to L and the hypotheses that neutrinos have been produced with a definite momentum p or, alternatively, with definite energy E. This represents an inconsistent scenario and gives an unjustified reduction by a factor of two in the mass oscillation formulas. Such an ambiguity has been a matter of speculations and mistakes in discussing flavor oscillations. We present a series of results and show how the problem of the factor two in the oscillation length is not a consequence of Gedanken experiments, i.e. oscillations in time. The common velocity scenario yields the maximum simplicity.
dc.description15
dc.description33
dc.description2057
dc.description2068
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWorld Scientific Publ Co Pte Ltd
dc.publisherSingapore
dc.publisherSingapura
dc.relationModern Physics Letters A
dc.relationMod. Phys. Lett. A
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectNeutrino Oscillations
dc.subjectQuantum-mechanics
dc.subjectDecays
dc.subjectLsnd
dc.titleRemarks upon the mass oscillation formulas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución