The Clinical Relevance of Information Index (CRII): assessing the relevance of health information to the clinical practice

dc.creatorGalvao, MCB
dc.creatorRicarte, ILM
dc.creatorGrad, RM
dc.creatorPluye, P
dc.date2013
dc.dateJUN
dc.date2014-07-31T13:53:30Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:53:09Z
dc.date2014-07-31T13:53:30Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:53:09Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:36:42Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:36:42Z
dc.identifierHealth Information And Libraries Journal. Wiley-blackwell, v. 30, n. 2, n. 110, n. 120, 2013.
dc.identifier1471-1834
dc.identifierWOS:000319286900002
dc.identifier10.1111/hir.12021
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/74955
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/74955
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1290450
dc.descriptionBackground The high volume of health information creates a need for processes and tools to select, evaluate and disseminate relevant information to health professionals in clinical practice. Objectives To introduce an index of the clinical relevance of information and to show that it is different from existing measures. Methods A conceptual model of knowledge translation was developed to explain the need for a new index, whose application was verified by an exploratory study with two (quantitative and qualitative) phases. The Clinical Relevance of Information Index (CRII) was defined employing descriptive statistical analyses of assessments performed by health professionals. The model and the CRII were applied in a primary healthcare context. Results The CRII was applied to 4574 relevance assessments of 194 evidence synopses. The assessments were performed by 41 family physicians in 2008. The CRII value of each synopsis was compared with the number of citations received by its corresponding research paper and with the level of evidence of the study, presenting weak correlation with both. Conclusion The CRII captures aspects of information not considered by other indices. It can be a parameter for information providers, institutions, editors, as well as health and information professionals targeting knowledge translation.
dc.description30
dc.description2
dc.description110
dc.description120
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley-blackwell
dc.publisherHoboken
dc.publisherEUA
dc.relationHealth Information And Libraries Journal
dc.relationHeatlth Info. Libr. J.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectevaluation
dc.subjectqualitative
dc.subjectevaluation
dc.subjectquantitative
dc.subjectevidence-based practice (EBP)
dc.subjectinformation sources
dc.subjectknowledge translation
dc.subjectprimary healthcare
dc.subjectselective dissemination of information (SDI)
dc.subjectScientific-research
dc.subjectMedical Literature
dc.subjectCitation Indexes
dc.subjectImpact Factor
dc.subjectEmail Alerts
dc.subjectJournals
dc.subjectRankings
dc.subjectQuality
dc.subjectMatters
dc.subjectScience
dc.titleThe Clinical Relevance of Information Index (CRII): assessing the relevance of health information to the clinical practice
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución