Suggestions for fixing top-down coastal fisheries management through participatory approaches

dc.creatorLopes, PFM
dc.creatorRosa, EM
dc.creatorSalyvonchyk, S
dc.creatorNora, V
dc.creatorBegossi, A
dc.date2013
dc.dateJUL
dc.date2014-07-30T20:06:55Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:52:59Z
dc.date2014-07-30T20:06:55Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:52:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:36:32Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:36:32Z
dc.identifierMarine Policy. Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 40, n. 100, n. 110, 2013.
dc.identifier0308-597X
dc.identifierWOS:000317539200012
dc.identifier10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.033
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/74722
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/74722
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1290403
dc.descriptionMarine protected areas created in a top-down way can be costly and ineffective due to low compliance of resource users. Conversely, employing users' local knowledge and involving them in decision-making processes could decrease costs and conflicts, in addition to increasing the chances of management success. Here the potential to change conflicting MPAs into conservation areas that take into account fishers' use and knowledge is assessed based on a case study on the Brazilian coast (Paraty town). Fishers (n=206) from 11 villages were interviewed regarding their main fishing targets and gear, and then only the experienced ones (n=41) were interviewed from three main fishing villages about the most important commercial species. Fish landings were sampled for one year in these three villages (n=823), where participatory mapping and group interviews with fishers were also conducted to determine their opinions regarding management and how they thought it should be undertaken. Management measures should not be equivalent across the whole region, as there were clear differences in the target species and gear used. Fishers identified 55 important fishing spots, eight of which were important for more than five villages, while the experts identified 10 important fishing areas for the target species, which was supported by the sampling of fish landings. The fishers were not opposed to management and no-take reserves but would make some changes in the current design of these measures if it were up to them. Based on these data, a few changes were indicated in the design of these areas that would likely reduce the conflict between fishers and enforcement agencies. This kind of approach could be used as a framework for adapting conflictive MPAs or to support the establishment of new ones where fisheries are relevant. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.descriptiono TEXTO COMPLETO DESTE ARTIGO, ESTARÁ DISPONÍVEL À PARTIR DE AGOSTO DE 2015.
dc.description40
dc.description100
dc.description110
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltd
dc.publisherOxford
dc.publisherInglaterra
dc.relationMarine Policy
dc.relationMar. Pol.
dc.rightsembargo
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectMarine protected areas
dc.subjectSmall-scale fisheries
dc.subjectCo-management
dc.subjectArtisanal fisheries
dc.subjectParticipatory management
dc.subjectMarine Protected Areas
dc.subjectLocal Ecological Knowledge
dc.subjectResource-management
dc.subjectConservation
dc.subjectComanagement
dc.subjectPhilippines
dc.subjectResilience
dc.subjectReserve
dc.subjectMpa
dc.subjectStakeholders
dc.titleSuggestions for fixing top-down coastal fisheries management through participatory approaches
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución