dc.creatorRamos, FN
dc.creatorSantos, FAM
dc.date2006
dc.dateMAY
dc.date2014-11-18T17:03:19Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:52:43Z
dc.date2014-11-18T17:03:19Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:52:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:36:13Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:36:13Z
dc.identifierBiotropica. Blackwell Publishing, v. 38, n. 3, n. 383, n. 389, 2006.
dc.identifier0006-3606
dc.identifierWOS:000236766500013
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00152.x
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/67464
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/67464
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/67464
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1290327
dc.descriptionPollinators, especially insects, could be influenced by forest fragmentation. The aim of this paper was to examine whether there were differences in 1) the communities of floral visitors; 2) the frequency of visits; and 3) the fruit and seed sets of individuals of Psychotria tenuinervis occurring at anthropogenic edges (AEs), natural edges (NEs), and in the forest interior (FI) in 2 yr of study. In 2002, the total number of flower visits was greater in NE and lower in AE, while no difference among habitats was found in 2003. There were differences among sample plots, within habitats, in both years. Bees were the most frequent visitors of P. tenuinervis flowers, and the introduced honeybee Apis mellifera was the most common species observed. There were no differences in the fruit and seed sets, or in the density of reproductive individuals of P. tenuinervis among habitats. However, in 2002, NE showed the greatest proportion of fruits per flower and AE the smallest. The similarity among the habitats was probably due to the marked variation or heterogeneity among the sample plots and among the plants within the habitats, which may have masked any interhabitat differences. The observed heterogeneity and the likely importance of other factors, such as gaps and the age of the edge, on the fragment studied, could be viewed as important issues for conservation programs.
dc.description38
dc.description3
dc.description383
dc.description389
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing
dc.publisherOxford
dc.publisherInglaterra
dc.relationBiotropica
dc.relationBiotropica
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectbees
dc.subjectedge
dc.subjectfloral visitors
dc.subjectfragmentation
dc.subjectfruit set
dc.subjectpollination
dc.subjectseed set
dc.subjectRain-forest
dc.subjectHoney-bee
dc.subjectHabitat Fragmentation
dc.subjectTropical Forest
dc.subjectFruit-set
dc.subjectSeed Set
dc.subjectConsequences
dc.subjectSynchrony
dc.subjectDynamics
dc.subjectShrubs
dc.titleFloral visitors and pollination of Psychotria tenuinervis (Rubiaceae): Distance from the anthropogenic and natural edges of an Atlantic forest fragment
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución