dc.creatorFaria, D
dc.creatorLaps, RR
dc.creatorBaumgarten, J
dc.creatorCetra, M
dc.date2006
dc.dateFEB
dc.date2014-11-17T12:42:47Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:37:47Z
dc.date2014-11-17T12:42:47Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:37:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:19:27Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:19:27Z
dc.identifierBiodiversity And Conservation. Springer, v. 15, n. 2, n. 587, n. 612, 2006.
dc.identifier0960-3115
dc.identifierWOS:000235489200003
dc.identifier10.1007/s10531-005-2089-1
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/55336
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/55336
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/55336
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1286050
dc.descriptionIn the core region of Brazilian cocoa production, shade cacao plantations (so-called cabrucas) are important components of regional landscapes, constituting potential habitat for a vast array of the regional biota. This research focuses on the ability of cabrucas to harbor bird and bat species in two nearby districts - Una and Ilheus - with contrasting landscapes. At Una, cabrucas represent less than 6% of the land and are surrounded by large tracts of forest, whereas at Ilheus these shade plantations are the landscape's dominant feature. Bird and bat communities were richer in cabrucas located in Una compared to nearby forest, while cabrucas from the Ilheus landscape were significantly poorer in species than nearby forest fragments. However, bird assemblages in cabrucas were characterized by the loss of understory specialists and the increase of more open area and generalist species, whereas forest dwellers still comprised most of the bat species reported in cabrucas. Species richness and composition differed between the two landscapes. Forest fragments and cabrucas from Ilheus harbored fewer forest-dwelling species than similar habitats in Una. Our study shows that cabrucas support high species richness of birds and bats from the native assemblages but are no surrogates for intact forests, since the presence and representativeness of some forest species apparently depends on the existence of nearby forests. A landscape dominated by cabrucas with a minor portion of native forest is unlikely to ensure long-term conservation of many target species, particularly those of major conservation concern.
dc.description15
dc.description2
dc.description587
dc.description612
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.publisherDordrecht
dc.publisherHolanda
dc.relationBiodiversity And Conservation
dc.relationBiodivers. Conserv.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectagroforestry
dc.subjectAtlantic Forest
dc.subjectbats
dc.subjectbirds
dc.subjectcabruca
dc.subjectneotropics
dc.subjectShade Cacao Plantation
dc.subjectCoffee Plantations
dc.subjectLos-tuxtlas
dc.subjectHabitat Fragmentation
dc.subjectBiological Diversity
dc.subjectSoutheastern Brazil
dc.subjectSpecies Richness
dc.subjectMexico
dc.subjectPhyllostomidae
dc.subjectConservation
dc.subjectBiodiversity
dc.titleBat and bird assemblages from forests and shade cacao plantations in two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic Forest of southern Bahia, Brazil
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución