dc.creatorPansarin, ER
dc.creatordo Amaral, MDE
dc.date2009
dc.date2014-11-19T18:55:47Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:30:19Z
dc.date2014-11-19T18:55:47Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:30:19Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:17:16Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:17:16Z
dc.identifierFlora. Elsevier Gmbh, Urban & Fischer Verlag, v. 204, n. 3, n. 238, n. 249, 2009.
dc.identifier0367-2530
dc.identifierWOS:000265297300008
dc.identifier10.1016/j.flora.2008.01.014
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/70945
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/70945
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/70945
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1285493
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionReproductive biology and pollination of Stanhopea lietzei and Stanhopea insignis were studied ill a semi-deciduous mesophytic forest in the Serra do Japi (SJ), and in the coastal plain of Picinguaba. both in the State of Sao Paulo. Brazil. Floral morphology, pollination, breeding system and fruit set of both species were investigated. S. lietzei and S. insignis are pollinator-specific, being pollinated by male bees of Eufriesea (Apidae, Euglossini), which collect the fragrance produced by pluricellular osmophores at the base of the saccate hypochile. S. lietzei and S. insignis were pollinated by Eufriesea pulchra and Eufriesea purpurata, respectively. Observations using substances present in the floral fragrance of both studied species as chemical baits were also performed. E purpurata was attracted by benzyl alcohol, the major compound of the perfume of S. insignis, while E pulchra was attracted by none of the compounds used. Both Studied Stanhopea are self-compatible but pollinator dependent. Self-pollination, however, tends to be avoided by floral mechanisms. In experimental self- and cross-pollinations the proportion of fruit abortion was high and related to resource limitation. The reproductive success of S. lietzei and S. insignis was low as a consequence of deficient pollen transference while pollinator scarcity was the main factor. (C) 2008 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
dc.description204
dc.description3
dc.description238
dc.description249
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionFAPESP [98/05097-0]
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier Gmbh, Urban & Fischer Verlag
dc.publisherJena
dc.publisherAlemanha
dc.relationFlora
dc.relationFlora
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectEuglossine
dc.subjectFloral biology
dc.subjectOrchidaceae
dc.subjectReproductive biology
dc.subjectStanhopea
dc.subjectStanhopeinae
dc.subjectMale Euglossine Bees
dc.subjectFruit Production
dc.subjectFloral Display
dc.subjectLimitations
dc.subjectDensity
dc.subjectSet
dc.subjectHymenoptera
dc.subjectFragrances
dc.subjectOsmophores
dc.subjectEvolution
dc.titleReproductive biology and pollination of southeastern Brazilian Stanhopea Frost ex Hook. (Orchidaceae)
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución