dc.creatorTanaka, MO
dc.creatorLeite, FPP
dc.date2003
dc.dateAUG 26
dc.date2014-11-16T21:29:47Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:26:49Z
dc.date2014-11-16T21:29:47Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:26:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:13:59Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:13:59Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Experimental Marine Biology And Ecology. Elsevier Science Bv, v. 293, n. 1, n. 1, n. 22, 2003.
dc.identifier0022-0981
dc.identifierWOS:000184480600001
dc.identifier10.1016/S0022-0981(03)00233-8
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/72018
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/72018
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/72018
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1284644
dc.descriptionBenthic communities can vary greatly at a range of temporal and spatial scales, due to different ecological processes that operate at each scale. Characteristics of the natural history of the organisms, Such as mobility and behavior, can influence their distribution, mainly at smaller scales. In this study, the spatial distribution of the macrofauna associated with Sargassum stenophyllum in SE Brazil was documented using a hierarchical sampling design, repeated four times throughout I year. We found differences in the density of the main macrofaunal groups at spatial scales ranging from meters to kilometers, sometimes with greater differences at smaller scales than between shores. We then analysed whether life habits influenced the distribution of gammarid amphipods, the dominant. Group. The distribution of tube-building amphipods was generally more patchy than that of free-living animals, although some variation among species was found within each category. Multivariate analyses indicated distinct gammarid assemblages a few meters distance from each other. Similarity among assemblages was reduced when comparing more distant assemblages, whereas faunal density influenced similarity in one of the four sampling dates. Factors that may influence the small-scale patchiness found in phytal communities include differences in physical conditions created by the spatial distribution of the substrate, habitat complexity as a result of epiphyte colonization, and aggregations caused by colonization of algal patches by organisms with direct development. Differences in reproductive and dispersal strategies of the animals can influence small-scale distribution of these assemblages, suggesting that effective descriptions of phylal communities should include more than one spatial scale. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.description293
dc.description1
dc.description1
dc.description22
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bv
dc.publisherAmsterdam
dc.publisherHolanda
dc.relationJournal Of Experimental Marine Biology And Ecology
dc.relationJ. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectamphipods
dc.subjectfunctional groups
dc.subjectlife habit
dc.subjectmacrofauna
dc.subjectphytal communities
dc.subjectSargassum
dc.subjectspatial scale
dc.subjectBenthic Invertebrates
dc.subjectPelvetia-fastigiata
dc.subjectChemical Defense
dc.subjectMobile Epifauna
dc.subjectLocal Dynamics
dc.subjectPlant Size
dc.subjectMarine
dc.subjectScales
dc.subjectAmphipod
dc.subjectCommunity
dc.titleSpatial scaling in the distribution of macrofauna associated with Sargassum stenophyllum (Mertens) Martius: analyses of faunal groups, gammarid life habits, and assemblage structure
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución