Clinical evaluation of association of bovine organic osseous matrix and bovine bone morphogenetic protein versus autogenous bone graft in sinus floor augmentation

dc.creatorSilva, FMSE
dc.creatorde Albergaria-Barbosa, JR
dc.creatorMazzonetto, R
dc.date2006
dc.dateJUN
dc.date2014-11-16T16:40:11Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:25:52Z
dc.date2014-11-16T16:40:11Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:25:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:13:05Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:13:05Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery. W B Saunders Co-elsevier Inc, v. 64, n. 6, n. 931, n. 935, 2006.
dc.identifier0278-2391
dc.identifierWOS:000237966500010
dc.identifier10.1016/j.joms.2006.02.026
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/56047
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/56047
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/56047
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1284422
dc.descriptionPurpose: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate clinically and radiographically the behavior of the association between bovine organic osseous matrix (BOM) and bovine bone morphogenetic protein (bBMP) versus autogenous bone graft in promoting bone heating in maxillary sinus lifting procedures. Materials and Methods: Ten nonsmoking and systemically healthy patients who needed bilateral maxillary sinus grafting for the placement of osseointegrated implants were treated. In all patients, 1 side was selected as test (bBMP + BOM) and the other as control using autogenous particulated bone graft from mandibular ramus. After a period varying from 6 to 11 months, the implants were placed. The radiographic analysis was realized by panoramic-rx. The clinical analysis consisted of transoperative evaluation by visual observation of bone formation of grafted area and initial stability of implants. Results: Radiographically, the images were evaluated observing radio-opaque aspect. Clinically, a better bone formation pattern of the grafted area in the side grafted with autogenous bone could be observed. The initial stability of the implants in the side grafted with autogenous bone was better than in the test side. The placement torque of the implants in the test side was more than 30 N-cm. Conclusions: in the present study, the association of bovine organic osseous matrix and bBMP as a growth factor showed different results when compared with autogenous graft. It was observed in the absence of an radio-opaque image, making it difficult to select the implants. Clinically, the bone formation was partial and showed the presence of the fibrous tissue in the grafted area when using the association of bovine organic osseous matrix and bBMP, and the placement torque of implants was less than the control side. (C) 2006 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
dc.description64
dc.description6
dc.description931
dc.description935
dc.languageen
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-elsevier Inc
dc.publisherPhiladelphia
dc.publisherEUA
dc.relationJournal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.relationJ. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectMaxillary Sinus
dc.subjectImplants
dc.titleClinical evaluation of association of bovine organic osseous matrix and bovine bone morphogenetic protein versus autogenous bone graft in sinus floor augmentation
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución