Brasil | Artículos de revistas

Comparison between gutta-percha and Resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreatment

dc.creatorde Oliveira, DP
dc.creatorBarbizam, JVB
dc.creatorTrope, M
dc.creatorTeixeira, FB
dc.date2006
dc.dateAPR
dc.date2014-11-16T03:54:35Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:23:06Z
dc.date2014-11-16T03:54:35Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:23:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:10:26Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:10:26Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Endodontics. Elsevier Science Inc, v. 32, n. 4, n. 362, n. 364, 2006.
dc.identifier0099-2399
dc.identifierWOS:000236593000020
dc.identifier10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.006
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/56204
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/56204
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/56204
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1283748
dc.descriptionThis study compared the remaining filling material and working time when removing gutta-percha/AH 26 and Resilon/Epiphany from root filled extracted teeth. The root fillings were removed using chloroform and two different rotary systems (K3 and Liberator files). The amount of residual filling material on the canal walls was imaged and measured using image analyzer software. The group filled with Resilon/Epiphany and retreated with K3 files demonstrated the least residual filling material on the walls (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the guttapercha/AH26 and Resilon/Epiphany groups when the Liberator files were used (p > 0.05). In the groups filled with Resilon/Epiphany, the filling was removed faster than groups filled with gutta-percha/AH 26 (p < 0.05). K3 rotary system was faster than Liberator to remove both gutta-percha and Resilon (p < 0.05). Resilon/ Epiphany was effectively removed with K3 or Liberator rotary files.
dc.description32
dc.description4
dc.description362
dc.description364
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.publisherNew York
dc.publisherEUA
dc.relationJournal Of Endodontics
dc.relationJ. Endod.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectendodontic retreatment
dc.subjectResilon
dc.subjectrotary files
dc.subjectRoot-canal Retreatment
dc.subjectRotational Speed
dc.subjectRotary Instruments
dc.subjectCleaning Ability
dc.subjectEfficacy
dc.subjectChloroform
dc.subjectSafety
dc.subjectFiles
dc.titleComparison between gutta-percha and Resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreatment
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución