dc.creatorRabelo, KCN
dc.creatorThyssen, PJ
dc.creatorSalgado, RL
dc.creatorAraujo, MSC
dc.creatorVasconcelos, SD
dc.date2011
dc.date42186
dc.date2014-07-30T13:52:14Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:19:56Z
dc.date2014-07-30T13:52:14Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:19:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T00:07:34Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T00:07:34Z
dc.identifierForensic Science International. Elsevier Ireland Ltd, v. 210, n. 41699, n. 257, n. 262, 2011.
dc.identifier0379-0738
dc.identifierWOS:000292034300045
dc.identifier10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.03.022
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/55650
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/55650
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1283017
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionThe use of heterogeneous animal tissues for the rearing of necrophagous insect species can produce uneven biological data, which can compromise the determination of larval age and, consequently, estimates for post-mortem intervals. We investigated the development of two species, Chrysomya megacephala and Chrysomya putoria (Diptera: Calliphoridae), reared on four substrates: minced beef (control) and semi-synthetic diets with the addition of sardine, rumen or chicken eggs. No differences in total developmental times were detected among larvae reared on different diets. Length and width of larvae were partially affected by the type of food. Third instar larvae and pupae of both species were heavier on beef treatment when compared with other substrates. Overall mortality was lower when beef was used as food. Longevity of adults and sex ratio were not negatively affected by the use of diets. Egg-based diet was the least effective for both species. Given the fact that several bionomical parameters of larvae reared on diets were close to those obtained when minced beef was offered, and considering the putrid odour, frequency of contamination and lack of homogeneity of animal tissue, semi-synthetic diets can be used for rearing C. megacephala and C. putoria. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description210
dc.description41699
dc.description257
dc.description262
dc.descriptionFacepe (Government of Pernambuco, Brazil)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd
dc.publisherClare
dc.publisherIrlanda
dc.relationForensic Science International
dc.relationForensic Sci.Int.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectDevelopment
dc.subjectForensic entomology
dc.subjectLife cycle
dc.subjectNecrophagous insects
dc.subjectArtificial Diet
dc.subjectLarvae
dc.subjectTissues
dc.titleBionomics of two forensically important blowfly species Chrysomya megacephala and Chrysomya putoria (Diptera: Calliphoridae) reared on four types of diet
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución