General hospital admission as an opportunity for smoking-cessation strategies: a clinical trial in Brazil

dc.creatorde Azevedo, RCS
dc.creatorMauro, MLF
dc.creatorLima, DD
dc.creatorGaspar, KC
dc.creatorda Silva, VF
dc.creatorBotega, NJ
dc.date2010
dc.dateNOV-DEC
dc.date2014-11-13T18:07:28Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:10:37Z
dc.date2014-11-13T18:07:28Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:10:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:59:10Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:59:10Z
dc.identifierGeneral Hospital Psychiatry. Elsevier Science Inc, v. 32, n. 6, n. 599, n. 606, 2010.
dc.identifier0163-8343
dc.identifierWOS:000285235000006
dc.identifier10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.09.013
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/67852
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/67852
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/67852
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1280903
dc.descriptionObjective: To compare the results of 6-month follow-ups for hospitalized patients who were divided into two groups of low- and high-intensity treatments for smoking cessation and compared to the results of standard hospital treatment. Methods: A total of 2414 patients were screened. Two hundred thirty-seven current smokers were randomly assigned to high-intensity intervention (HII; 30-min motivational interview plus seven routine telephone calls after hospital discharge) or to low-intensity intervention (LII; 15-min counseling about the benefits of quitting) and 80 comprised the usual care (UC) group. Six months after hospital discharge, all participants were contacted by phone. The main outcome measure was smoking cessation. Results: The smoking-cessation rates were 44.9%, 41.7% and 26.3% for the LII and UC groups, respectively (P = .03). The multivariable analysis identified the following variables which are associated with the failure to stop smoking: the absence of a tobacco-related disease (TRD), younger age and a low motivation for cessation at the initial contact. Conclusions: There was a great difference between intervention and nonintervention. The LII had an impact similar to the HII. The variables associated with no smoking cessation demonstrate the need for more personalized interventions for smokers who present lower indexes of motivation, are younger and do not have smoking-related diseases. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.description32
dc.description6
dc.description599
dc.description606
dc.descriptionResearch Foundation of the State of Sao Paulo [06/61885-6]
dc.descriptionResearch Foundation of the State of Sao Paulo [06/61885-6]
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.publisherNew York
dc.publisherEUA
dc.relationGeneral Hospital Psychiatry
dc.relationGen. Hosp. Psych.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectSmoking
dc.subjectSmoking cessation
dc.subjectIntervention
dc.subjectInpatient
dc.subjectBrief Intervention
dc.subjectDepression Scale
dc.subjectPredictors
dc.subjectSmokers
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectValidation
dc.subjectDependence
dc.subjectDisorders
dc.subjectTherapy
dc.subjectAnxiety
dc.titleGeneral hospital admission as an opportunity for smoking-cessation strategies: a clinical trial in Brazil
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución