Transboundary Socio-Ecological Effects of a Marine Protected Area in the Southwest Atlantic

dc.creatorLopes, PFM
dc.creatorSilvano, RAM
dc.creatorNora, VA
dc.creatorBegossi, A
dc.date2013
dc.dateNOV
dc.date2014-08-01T18:20:44Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:06:10Z
dc.date2014-08-01T18:20:44Z
dc.date2015-11-26T17:06:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:54:35Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:54:35Z
dc.identifierAmbio. Springer, v. 42, n. 8, n. 963, n. 974, 2013.
dc.identifier0044-7447
dc.identifier1654-7209
dc.identifierWOS:000326892600006
dc.identifier10.1007/s13280-013-0452-0
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/77485
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/77485
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1279781
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionMarine Protected Areas (MPAs) have been regarded as an alternative to protect natural resources and to improve fisheries. However, MPAs may also have negative socio-economic consequences on fishing communities. We aimed to check the effectiveness of a socially conflicting MPA in Brazil by assessing target reef fish biomass in islands inside (n = 6) and outside (n = 6) the MPA, fisheries' productivity (biomass), catch per unit of effort (CPUE), and fishers' socio-economic status (mainly fishers' income) in three fishing communities subjected to different degrees of influence (close, average, and long distance) of the MPA. The CPUE was higher in the fishing community that was further away from the MPA, fish biomass was higher in the islands located inside the MPA in the southern region and in the islands located outside the MPA in the northern region, while fishers were making the most money closest to the MPA, where conflicts are the highest, probably from practicing very intensive fisheries. This integrated approach showed that the studied MPA has not delivered ecological benefits, such as higher CPUE or more fish, while higher income closer to the MPA could not be clearly attributed to its effects.
dc.description42
dc.description8
dc.descriptionSI
dc.description963
dc.description974
dc.descriptionIDRC (Canada) [104519-004]
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionIDRC
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionIDRC (Canada) [104519-004]
dc.descriptionFAPESP [2009/11154-3]
dc.descriptionCNPq [304377/2010-4]
dc.descriptionFAPESP [2012/16722-2]
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.publisherDordrecht
dc.publisherHolanda
dc.relationAmbio
dc.relationAmbio
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectSmall-scale fisheries
dc.subjectFisheries conflicts
dc.subjectReef fishes
dc.subjectEcosystem-based management
dc.subjectFish conservation
dc.subjectFisheries management
dc.subjectSmall-scale Fisheries
dc.subjectArtisanal Fishery
dc.subjectManagement
dc.subjectReserves
dc.subjectKnowledge
dc.subjectBrazil
dc.subjectReef
dc.subjectConservation
dc.subjectBiodiversity
dc.subjectRegulations
dc.titleTransboundary Socio-Ecological Effects of a Marine Protected Area in the Southwest Atlantic
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución