dc.creatorPereira, LJ
dc.creatorGaviao, MBD
dc.creatorBonjardim, LR
dc.creatorCastelo, PM
dc.date2007
dc.dateOCT
dc.date2014-07-30T19:27:42Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:55:37Z
dc.date2014-07-30T19:27:42Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:55:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:43:04Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:43:04Z
dc.identifierDentomaxillofacial Radiology. British Inst Radiology, v. 36, n. 7, n. 402, n. 408, 2007.
dc.identifier0250-832X
dc.identifierWOS:000250334900006
dc.identifier10.1259/dmfr/16641858
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/73323
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/73323
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1277177
dc.descriptionObjectives: Condylar position in the glenoid fossa has been linked to temporomandibular disorders (TMDs); however its importance in TMD aetiology is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine joint spaces and condylar position in adolescents with TMDs using ultrasound static images and linear corrected tomograms at the mandibular rest position. Methods: Craniomandibular index (CMI) and a symptom questionnaire were assessed in 217 subjects aged 12 18 years. Those with the lowest and the highest scores were divided into control (n=20) and SSTMD (presence of signs and symptoms of TMD) groups (n=20). Ultrasound images and tomography were used to measure the distance between the capsule and the lateral surface of the condyle and to determine the condyle location at the mandibular resting position, respectively. Results: The mean distances obtained from ultrasound images did not correlate with CMI scores and they did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). Posterior positioned condyles were determined on tomograms, and they were more prevalent both in the SSTMD group (P = 0.05) and in girls (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Even though there was a significant difference in condyle position between the control and SSTMD groups, determined by axially corrected tomograms, it cannot be inferred that posteriorly positioned condyles can predict TMDs. In addition, there was no association between the articular capsule and the lateral condyle surface distances measured by ultrasound using a 10 MHz linear transducer and the clinical diagnosis of TMD. Further studies in diagnostic imaging of TMJs with ultrasound should be encouraged, since it has some useful diagnostic applications and does not require special facilities. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2007) 36, 402-408. doi: 10. 1259/dmfr/16641858
dc.descriptiono TEXTO COMPLETO DESTE ARTIGO, ESTARÁ DISPONÍVEL À PARTIR DE AGOSTO DE 2015.
dc.description36
dc.description7
dc.description402
dc.description408
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBritish Inst Radiology
dc.publisherLondon
dc.publisherInglaterra
dc.relationDentomaxillofacial Radiology
dc.relationDentomaxillofac. Radiol.
dc.rightsembargo
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjecttemporomandibular joint
dc.subjectultrasound
dc.subjecttomography
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectHigh-resolution Ultrasonography
dc.subjectDisc Displacement
dc.subjectSpatial Relationships
dc.subjectInternal Derangement
dc.subjectCondyle Position
dc.subjectTmj
dc.subjectMorphology
dc.subjectValidity
dc.subjectChildren
dc.subjectMotion
dc.titleUltrasound and tomographic evaluation of temporomandibular joints in adolescents with and without Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders: a pilot Study
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución