dc.creatorRomero, GQ
dc.creatorKoricheva, J
dc.date2011
dc.dateMAY
dc.date2014-07-30T14:02:14Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:51:51Z
dc.date2014-07-30T14:02:14Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:51:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:38:39Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:38:39Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Animal Ecology. Wiley-blackwell, v. 80, n. 3, n. 696, n. 704, 2011.
dc.identifier0021-8790
dc.identifierWOS:000289160900022
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01808.x
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/56994
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/56994
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1276096
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionP>1. Although carnivores indirectly improve plant fitness by decreasing herbivory, they may also decrease plant reproduction by disrupting plant-pollinator mutualism. The overall magnitude of the resulting net effect of carnivores on plant fitness and the factors responsible for the variations in strength and direction of this effect have not been explored quantitatively to date. 2. We performed a meta-analysis of 67 studies containing 163 estimates of the effects of carnivores on plant fitness and examined the relative importance of several potential sources of variation in carnivore effects. 3. Carnivores significantly increased plant fitness via suppression of herbivores and decreased fitness by consuming pollinators. The overall net effect of carnivores on plant fitness was positive (32% increase), indicating that effects via herbivores were stronger than effects via pollinators. 4. Parasitoids had stronger positive effect on plant fitness than predators. Active hunters increased plant fitness, whereas stationary predators had no significant effect, presumably because they were more prone to disrupt plant-pollinator mutualism. Carnivores with broader habitat domain had negative effects on plant fitness, whereas those with narrow habitat domain had positive effects. 5. Predator effects were positive for plants which offered rewards (e.g. extrafloral nectaries) and negative for plants which lacked any attractors. 6. This study adds new knowledge on the factors that determine the strength of terrestrial trophic cascades and highlights the importance of considering simultaneous contrasting interactions in the same study system.
dc.description80
dc.description3
dc.description696
dc.description704
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionFAPESP [04/13658-5]
dc.descriptionCNPq [309815/2009-6]
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley-blackwell
dc.publisherMalden
dc.publisherEUA
dc.relationJournal Of Animal Ecology
dc.relationJ. Anim. Ecol.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectindirect effects
dc.subjectindirect plant defences
dc.subjectpollen limitation
dc.subjectpredator hunting mode
dc.subjecttop-down
dc.subjecttrophic cascade
dc.subjectPredator Hunting Mode
dc.subjectTrophic Cascades
dc.subjectBiotic Interactions
dc.subjectHost-plant
dc.subjectAnts
dc.subjectSpiders
dc.subjectPollinators
dc.subjectDefenses
dc.subjectStrength
dc.subjectEcosystems
dc.titleContrasting cascade effects of carnivores on plant fitness: a meta-analysis
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución