dc.creatorCecchin, D
dc.creatorFarina, AP
dc.creatorGuerreiro, CAM
dc.creatorCarlini, B
dc.date2010
dc.dateFEB
dc.date2014-11-17T18:56:12Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:45:48Z
dc.date2014-11-17T18:56:12Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:45:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:31:28Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:31:28Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Oral Rehabilitation. Wiley-blackwell Publishing, Inc, v. 37, n. 2, n. 116, n. 122, 2010.
dc.identifier0305-182X
dc.identifierWOS:000273604500006
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02028.x
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/67120
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/67120
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/67120
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1274330
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this study was to assess the fracture resistance of roots that were prosthetically restored with intra-radicular posts of different lengths. Forty-five bovine incisors were sectioned 17 mm from their apices, endodontically treated and randomly divided into three experimental groups: GI, fibreglass posts luted at a depth of 12 mm; GII, 8 mm and GIII, 4 mm. All posts were luted with dual resin cement. Resin composite cores were prepared with standardized measurements, and all teeth were restored with metal crowns. The samples were submitted to the fracture resistance test in a universal testing machine, at an angle of 135 degrees and speed of 0.5 mm min(-1), until fracture occurred. The data, in MPa, were submitted to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's test (alpha = 0.01). No statistically significant difference (P > 0.01) was found between GI (129.72 +/- 12.14) and GII (154.3 +/- 12.08), which presented the highest fracture resistance values. Group GIII (100.5 +/- 8.07) showed lower fracture resistance (P < 0.01) when compared with GI and GII. Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the post lengths influenced the fracture resistance of prosthetically restored roots. These results suggest that it is not necessary to perform excessive intra-radicular post-space preparation to improve the fracture resistance of roots.
dc.description37
dc.description2
dc.description116
dc.description122
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley-blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.publisherMalden
dc.publisherEUA
dc.relationJournal Of Oral Rehabilitation
dc.relationJ. Oral Rehabil.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectfibreglass posts
dc.subjectfracture resistance
dc.subjectpost length
dc.subjectroot fracture
dc.subjectendodontically treated teeth
dc.subjectEndodontically Treated Teeth
dc.subjectReinforced Epoxy-resin
dc.subjectIn-vitro
dc.subjectStress-distribution
dc.subjectCarbon-fiber
dc.subjectGlass-fiber
dc.subjectPulpless Teeth
dc.subjectFerrule Length
dc.subjectCore Systems
dc.subjectBovine Teeth
dc.titleFracture resistance of roots prosthetically restored with intra-radicular posts of different lengths
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución