dc.creatorUshikubo, FY
dc.creatorWatanabe, AP
dc.creatorViotto, LA
dc.date2007
dc.dateFEB 1
dc.date2014-11-17T04:38:05Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:42:53Z
dc.date2014-11-17T04:38:05Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:42:53Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:27:38Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:27:38Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Membrane Science. Elsevier Science Bv, v. 288, n. 41671, n. 61, n. 66, 2007.
dc.identifier0376-7388
dc.identifierWOS:000244736000008
dc.identifier10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.003
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/56712
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/56712
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/56712
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1273417
dc.descriptionUmbu (Spondias tuberosa Arr. Cam.) diluted pulp, at mass ratio of one part of pulp to two parts of water, was microfiltered in a pilot plant containing a 0.2 mu m polypropylene membrane. A clarified juice free of pulp and with low pectin content was obtained. Effects of enzyme treatment (0-100ppm), crossflow velocity (4-6 m/s) and transmembrane pressure (0.5 x 10(5)-1.1 x 10(5) Pa (0.5-1.1 bar)) were evaluated using permeate flux and flux resistances (total, due to fouling and polarized layer formation) as parameters. Crossflow velocity was the major variable responsible for flux increase, since it reduced polarized layer. Enzyme treatment also presented a positive effect. On the other hand, transmembrane pressure increased fouling and did not influence permeate flux in most cases, except when no enzyme was added and high velocity was applied, in which flux was reduced. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
dc.description288
dc.description41671
dc.description61
dc.description66
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bv
dc.publisherAmsterdam
dc.publisherHolanda
dc.relationJournal Of Membrane Science
dc.relationJ. Membr. Sci.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectSpondias tuberosa
dc.subjectumbu
dc.subjectmicrofiltration
dc.subjectclarification
dc.subjectflux resistances
dc.subjectPassion-fruit Juice
dc.subjectApple Juice
dc.subjectCeramic Membranes
dc.subjectPineapple Juice
dc.subjectUltrafiltration
dc.subjectClarification
dc.titleMicrofiltration of umbu (Spondias tuberosa Arr. Cam.) juice
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución