Correlations between bibliometrics and peer evaluation for all disciplines: the evaluation of Brazilian scientists

dc.creatorWainer, J
dc.creatorVieira, P
dc.date2013
dc.dateAUG
dc.date2014-07-30T14:02:47Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:42:24Z
dc.date2014-07-30T14:02:47Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:42:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:26:56Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:26:56Z
dc.identifierScientometrics. Springer, v. 96, n. 2, n. 395, n. 410, 2013.
dc.identifier0138-9130
dc.identifierWOS:000321852600001
dc.identifier10.1007/s11192-013-0969-9
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/57295
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/57295
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1273257
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionThis paper correlates the peer evaluations performed in late 2009 by the disciplinary committees of CNPq (a Brazilian funding agency) with some standard bibliometric measures for 55 scientific areas. We compared the decisions to increase, maintain or decrease a scientist's research scholarship funded by CNPq. We analyzed these decisions for 2,663 Brazilian scientists and computed their correlations (Spearman rho) with 21 different measures, among them: total production, production in the last 5 years, production indexed in Web of Science and Scopus, total citations received (according to WOS, Scopus, and Google Scholar), h-index and m-quotient (according to the three citation services). The highest correlations for each area range from 0.95 to 0.29, although there are areas with no significantly positive correlation with any of the metrics.
dc.description96
dc.description2
dc.description395
dc.description410
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.publisherDordrecht
dc.publisherHolanda
dc.relationScientometrics
dc.relationScientometrics
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectScientist evaluation
dc.subjectPeer evaluation
dc.subjectBibliometric measures
dc.subjectBrazil
dc.subjectH-index
dc.subjectIndicators
dc.subjectMetaanalysis
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectCriteria
dc.subjectRanking
dc.subjectPhysics
dc.subjectField
dc.titleCorrelations between bibliometrics and peer evaluation for all disciplines: the evaluation of Brazilian scientists
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución