dc.creatorAmorim, FW
dc.creatorGaletto, L
dc.creatorSazima, M
dc.date2013
dc.dateMAR
dc.date2014-07-30T13:51:52Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:41:07Z
dc.date2014-07-30T13:51:52Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:41:07Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:25:15Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:25:15Z
dc.identifierPlant Biology. Wiley-blackwell, v. 15, n. 2, n. 317, n. 327, 2013.
dc.identifier1435-8603
dc.identifierWOS:000314756900007
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00643.x
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/55446
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/55446
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1272831
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionInga species present brush-type flower morphology allowing them to be visited by distinct groups of pollinators. Nectar features in relation to the main pollinators have seldom been studied in this genus. To test the hypothesis of floral adaptation to both diurnal and nocturnal pollinators, we studied the pollination ecology of Inga sessilis, with emphasis on the nectar secretion patterns, effects of sequential removals on nectar production, sugar composition and the role of diurnal and nocturnal pollinators in its reproductive success. Inga sessilis is self-incompatible and pollinated by hummingbirds, hawkmoths and bats. Fruit set under natural conditions is very low despite the fact that most stigmas receive polyads with sufficient pollen to fertilise all ovules in a flower. Nectar secretion starts in the bud stage and flowers continually secreting nectar for a period of 8h. Flowers actively reabsorbed the nectar a few hours before senescence. Sugar production increased after nectar removal, especially when flowers were drained during the night. Nectar sugar composition changed over flower life span, from sucrose-dominant (just after flower opening, when hummingbirds were the main visitors) to hexose-rich (throughout the night, when bats and hawkmoths were the main visitors). Diurnal pollinators contributed less than nocturnal ones to fruit production, but the former were more constant and reliable visitors through time. Our results indicate I.sessilis has floral adaptations, beyond the morphology, that encompass both diurnal and nocturnal pollinator requirements, suggesting a complementary and mixed pollination system.
dc.description15
dc.description2
dc.description317
dc.description327
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
dc.descriptionSecretaria de Ciencia y Tecnologia de la Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionFAPESP [03/12595-7]
dc.descriptionCNPq [302452/2008-7]
dc.descriptionFAPESP [2007/58666-3]
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley-blackwell
dc.publisherHoboken
dc.publisherEUA
dc.relationPlant Biology
dc.relationPlant Biol.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectAtlantic rain forest
dc.subjectbat pollination
dc.subjecthawkmoth pollination
dc.subjecthummingbird pollination
dc.subjectlegume
dc.subjectMimosoideae
dc.subjectpollination biology
dc.subjectAtlantic Forest Sites
dc.subjectSugar Composition
dc.subjectBreeding Systems
dc.subjectFloral Nectar
dc.subjectCentral Brazil
dc.subjectManduca-sexta
dc.subjectPatterns
dc.subjectTrees
dc.subjectBiology
dc.subjectFlower
dc.titleBeyond the pollination syndrome: nectar ecology and the role of diurnal and nocturnal pollinators in the reproductive success of Inga sessilis (Fabaceae)
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución