dc.creatorGiannini, M
dc.creatorDi Francescantonio, M
dc.creatorPacheco, RR
dc.creatorBoaro, LCC
dc.creatorBraga, RR
dc.date2014
dc.dateMAY-JUN
dc.date2014-07-30T16:52:03Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:37:30Z
dc.date2014-07-30T16:52:03Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:37:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:20:37Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:20:37Z
dc.identifierOperative Dentistry. Operative Dentistry Inc, v. 39, n. 3, n. 264, n. 272, 2014.
dc.identifier0361-7734
dc.identifier1559-2863
dc.identifierWOS:000335430300006
dc.identifier10.2341/12-526-L
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/62922
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/62922
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1272036
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionObjective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness (SR), water sorption (WS), and solubility (SO) of four composite resins after finishing/polishing and after one year of water storage. Materials and Methods: Two low-shrinkage composites (Filtek Silorane [3M ESPE] and Aelite LS [Bisco Inc]) and two composites of conventional formulations (Heliomolar and Tetric N-Ceram [Ivoclar Vivadent]) were tested. Their respective finishing and polishing systems (Sof-Lex Discs, 3M ESPE; Finishing Discs Kit, Bisco Inc; and Astropol F, P, HP, Ivoclar Vivadent) were used according to the manufacturers' instructions. Ten disc-shaped specimens of each composite resin were made for each evaluation. Polished surfaces were analyzed using a profilometer after 24 hours and one year. For the WS and SO, the discs were stored in desiccators until constant mass was achieved. Specimens were then stored in water for seven days or one year, at which time the mass of each specimen was measured. The specimens were dried again and dried specimen mass determined. The WS and SO were calculated from these measurements. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test (alpha=0.05). Results: Filtek Silorane showed the lowest SR, WS, and SO means. Water storage for one year increased the WS means for all composite resins tested. Conclusions: The silorane-based composite resin results were better than those obtained for methacrylate-based resins. One-year water storage did not change the SR and SO properties in any of the composite resins.
dc.description39
dc.description3
dc.description264
dc.description272
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionFAPESP [2009/51454-6]
dc.descriptionCNPq [305777-2010-6]
dc.languageen
dc.publisherOperative Dentistry Inc
dc.publisherIndianapolis
dc.publisherÍndia
dc.relationOperative Dentistry
dc.relationOper. Dent.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectShrink Dental Composites
dc.subjectStep Polishing Systems
dc.subjectSurface-roughness
dc.subjectStaining Susceptibility
dc.subjectRestorative Materials
dc.subjectMechanical-properties
dc.subjectIn-vitro
dc.subjectPolymerization
dc.subjectGloss
dc.subjectTime
dc.titleCharacterization of Water Sorption, Solubility, and Roughness of Silorane- and Methacrylate-based Composite Resins
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución