Analysis of the performance of 100% rapid review using an average time of 1 and 2 minutes according to the quality of cervical cytology specimens

dc.creatorManrique, EJC
dc.creatorSouza, NLA
dc.creatorTavares, SBN
dc.creatorAlbuquerque, ZBP
dc.creatorZeferino, LC
dc.creatorAmaral, RG
dc.date2011
dc.dateJUN
dc.date2014-07-30T13:49:04Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:35:45Z
dc.date2014-07-30T13:49:04Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:35:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:18:19Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:18:19Z
dc.identifierCytopathology. Wiley-blackwell, v. 22, n. 3, n. 195, n. 201, 2011.
dc.identifier0956-5507
dc.identifierWOS:000290770200010
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00776.x
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/54643
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/54643
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1271613
dc.descriptionAnalysis of the performance of 100% rapid review using an average time of 1 and 2 minutes according to the quality of cervical cytology specimens Objectives: To compare the performance of the 100% rapid review method carried out in a mean time of either 1 or 2 minutes according to cytological final result, and to assess whether the presence of obscuring factors in cervical smear samples affects the frequency of false-negative results. Methods: A total of 5 235 smears classified as negative (93.0%) or unsatisfactory (2.1%) at routine screening were submitted to 100% rapid review using mean times of 1 and 2 minutes. Results: Of the 5 235 smears submitted to 1-minute rapid review, 88 were considered suspect and of these, 45 were confirmed as abnormal in the cytological final result. When the time used was 2 minutes, 67 smears were considered suspect, 44 of which were confirmed as abnormal. Sensitivity and specificity were similar in the 1- and 2-minute reviews. In smears in which samples were satisfactory and had no obscuring factors, sensitivity and specificity were 64.2% and 98.9% and 61.5% and 99.5% for the 1- and 2-minute reviews, respectively. In comparison, in smears in which the sample was satisfactory for analysis but partially obscured (50-75%), sensitivity and specificity were 64.7% and 99.9% and 70.6% and 99.8% for the 1- and 2-minute reviews, respectively. Conclusions: The method of rapid review of 100% showed no difference in the detection of false-negative results using the time of 1 or 2 minutes. The quality of the sample did not influence the detection of false-negatives.
dc.description22
dc.description3
dc.description195
dc.description201
dc.descriptionGoias Foundation [002/2007]
dc.descriptionGoias Foundation [002/2007]
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley-blackwell
dc.publisherMalden
dc.publisherEUA
dc.relationCytopathology
dc.relationCytopathology
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectquality control
dc.subjectrapid review
dc.subjectcytopathology
dc.subjectcervical screening
dc.subjectsample adequacy
dc.subjectPapanicolaou Smears
dc.subjectAssurance Measure
dc.subjectCancer
dc.subjectAbnormalities
dc.subjectAgreement
dc.titleAnalysis of the performance of 100% rapid review using an average time of 1 and 2 minutes according to the quality of cervical cytology specimens
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución