dc.creatorSato, FRL
dc.creatorAsprino, L
dc.creatorConsani, S
dc.creatorNoritomi, PY
dc.creatorde Moraes, M
dc.date2012
dc.dateNOV
dc.date2014-07-30T13:39:20Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:35:25Z
dc.date2014-07-30T13:39:20Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:35:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:17:52Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:17:52Z
dc.identifierOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology. Elsevier Science Inc, v. 114, n. 5, n. S60, n. S68, 2012.
dc.identifier2212-4403
dc.identifierWOS:000311369000010
dc.identifier10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.08.027
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/52934
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/52934
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1271502
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionObjective. This study evaluated the mechanical characteristics and stress distribution of the hybrid technique fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Study Design. In the mechanical test, 10 polyurethane replicas of human hemimandibles of each group were submitted to linear loading test. For the photoelastic evaluation, 3 hemimandible replicas of photoelastic resin were subjected to photoelastic analysis. In the finite element analysis, 3 computer models simulated the displacement and the results of maximum principal stress were analyzed. Results. The results of this study demonstrated that the fixation technique with 3 bicortical screws presented better mechanical resistance and stress distribution pattern when compared with the hybrid technique that, on the other hand, presents better results in comparison with a miniplate and monocortical screws. Conclusions. The results suggest that the hybrid technique increased the resistance and improved stress distribution of miniplate/monocortical screw fixation, maintaining most of the advantages of this technique. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;114(suppl 5):S60-S68)
dc.description114
dc.description5
dc.descriptionS
dc.descriptionS60
dc.descriptionS68
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionCNPq [141231/2008-4]
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.publisherNew York
dc.publisherEUA
dc.relationOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology
dc.relationOral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectInternal Screw Fixation
dc.subjectBiomechanical Evaluation
dc.subjectPosition Screws
dc.subjectStability
dc.subjectOsteosynthesis
dc.subjectStabilization
dc.subjectPlacement
dc.subjectFracture
dc.titleA comparative evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución