dc.creatorDa Silva, LCP
dc.creatorWang, Y
dc.creatorXu, WS
dc.creatorDa Costa, VF
dc.date2001
dc.dateJUN
dc.date2014-11-16T22:48:19Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:25:38Z
dc.date2014-11-16T22:48:19Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:25:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:06:23Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:06:23Z
dc.identifierElectric Power Components And Systems. Taylor & Francis Ltd, v. 29, n. 6, n. 565, n. 576, 2001.
dc.identifier1532-5008
dc.identifierWOS:000168800500007
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/56147
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/56147
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/56147
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1268674
dc.descriptionIn power flow calculations, usually a generator is represented as a PV bus, and a simplified method is used to model its reactive power limit. The PQ modeling approach, which converts the generator from PV bus to PQ bus when the reactive power limit is reached, is widely accepted and used by professional load pow programs; however, in reality, a generator on the limit behaves as a constant field voltage Instead of a constant reactive output. This fact has raised frequent discussions on the literature abet the accuracy or errors introduced by the conventional PQ model on pourer pow computations. Unfortunately. the real differences between the two modeling approaches for power pow studies have not been researched by these previous efforts. The purpose of this paper is to carry out comprehensive investigation, on the impact of the two modeling methods for power flow studies. They are compared from three different perspectives: impact on load flour results, impact on voltage stability margin. and convergence behavior. Based on the results. advantages and dis-advantages of the two modeling approaches are discussed, and conclusions are made on the appropriate approach for representing generator var limit for load flow studies.
dc.description29
dc.description6
dc.description565
dc.description576
dc.languageen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd
dc.publisherLondon
dc.publisherInglaterra
dc.relationElectric Power Components And Systems
dc.relationElectr. Power Compon. Syst.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/permissions/reusingOwnWork.asp
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectload flow
dc.subjectgenerator VAR limit
dc.subjectfield current limit
dc.subjectvoltage stability margin
dc.subjectVoltage Stability
dc.subjectLoad
dc.titleComparative studies on methods of modeling generator var limit for power-flow calculations
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución