dc.creatorPalioto, DB
dc.creatorJoly, JC
dc.creatorde Lima, AFM
dc.creatorMota, LF
dc.creatorCaffesse, R
dc.date2003
dc.dateJAN
dc.date2014-11-16T17:13:06Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:24:11Z
dc.date2014-11-16T17:13:06Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:24:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:05:12Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:05:12Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Clinical Periodontology. Blackwell Munksgaard, v. 30, n. 1, n. 1, n. 8, 2003.
dc.identifier0303-6979
dc.identifierWOS:000180977200001
dc.identifier10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.300101.x
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/56034
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/56034
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/56034
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1268388
dc.descriptionObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) alone and in conjunction with a bovine inorganic bone matrix in furcation defects. Material and methods: Twenty class III furcation defects were treated in 18 nonsmoker patients, 35-75 years old. Horizontal (CAL-H) and vertical clinical attachment levels (CAL-V), probing depths (PD), gingival margin levels (GML), horizontal (BDL-H) and vertical bone defect levels (BDL-V), and alveolar crest levels (ACL) were performed at baseline and at 6-month re-entry procedures. Subtraction radiography was used to assess gain or loss in optical density (OD) and area of bone fill (A) (baseline/6 months). After flap elevation, the sites were randomly assigned to receive GTR + Bio-Oss((R)) (test) or GTR treatment alone (control). Results were evaluated using ANOVA. Results: Differences were statistically significant between baseline and re-entry for PD, ACL (p < 0.01) and GML (p < 0.05) for the control group, and for BDL-V (p < 0.01) for the test group. There was a gain in ACL for the test group and a reduction in ACL for the control group (p < 0.0 1). No differences were observed for OD and A. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that class III furcation defects are not predictably resolved utilizing GTR or GTR in combination with an inorganic bone matrix.
dc.description30
dc.description1
dc.description1
dc.description8
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard
dc.publisherCopenhagen
dc.publisherDinamarca
dc.relationJournal Of Clinical Periodontology
dc.relationJ. Clin. Periodontol.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectguided tissue regeneration
dc.subjectbone graft
dc.subjectfurcation defects
dc.subjectsubtraction radiography
dc.subjectGuided Tissue Regeneration
dc.subjectFreeze-dried Bone
dc.subjectHuman Infrabony Defects
dc.subjectPeriodontal Regeneration
dc.subjectMandibular Molars
dc.subjectInvolvements
dc.subjectAllografts
dc.subjectInvasions
dc.subjectMembranes
dc.subjectBarriers
dc.titleClinical and radiographic treatment evaluation of class III furcation defects using GTR with and without inorganic bone matrix
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución