dc.creatorLima, GAC
dc.creatorSuslick, SB
dc.date2008
dc.date2014-07-30T14:35:16Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:19:59Z
dc.date2014-07-30T14:35:16Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:19:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:02:41Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:02:41Z
dc.identifierInternational Journal Of Oil Gas And Coal Technology. Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, v. 1, n. 41671, n. 3, n. 23, 2008.
dc.identifier1753-3309
dc.identifierWOS:000208080000002
dc.identifier10.1504/IJOGCT.2008.016729
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/60658
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/60658
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1267762
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionThis paper presents a model for valuation and decision making, integrating discounted cash flow, real-options pricing and preference theory, aiming to cover the following questions: i) what is the current value of a project?; ii) what is the optimal investment rule?; iii) what is the optimal working interest? The traditional model suggests that, when the project value is above its investment cost, the corporation should invest immediately and incur in 100% working interest. The real option pricing suggests that the corporation should only invest if the project's current value is at least 1.85 times investment cost. The preference theory suggests funding only 44.38% working interest, and partners must acquire the remaining 55.62%. These tools must be integrated in order to allow a more realistic treatment of risk. In general, when the uncertainty (volatility) of cash flow components increases, the two models give more divergent results.
dc.descriptionO TEXTO COMPLETO DESTE ARTIGO, ESTARÁ DISPONÍVEL À PARTIR DE FEVEREIRO DE 2015.
dc.description1
dc.description41671
dc.description3
dc.description23
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionCEPETRO/UNICAMP
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionPETROBRAS
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInderscience Enterprises Ltd
dc.publisherGeneva
dc.publisherSuíça
dc.relationInternational Journal Of Oil Gas And Coal Technology
dc.relationInt. J. Oil Gas Coal Technol.
dc.rightsembargo
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectuncertainty
dc.subjectreal options
dc.subjectcapital budgeting
dc.subjectpreference theory
dc.subjectpetroleum exploration
dc.subjectproduction
dc.titleInvestment decision in oil and gas projects using real option and risk tolerance models
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución