dc.creatorDa Silva, FC
dc.creatorVan Raij, B
dc.date1999
dc.dateFEB
dc.date2014-12-02T16:25:13Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:13:13Z
dc.date2014-12-02T16:25:13Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:13:13Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T23:01:01Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T23:01:01Z
dc.identifierPesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira. Empresa Brasil Pesq Agropec, v. 34, n. 2, n. 267, n. 288, 1999.
dc.identifier0100-204X
dc.identifierWOS:000079259700016
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/59534
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/59534
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/59534
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1267355
dc.descriptionThe objective of this paper was the comparative study of the most important extractors of soil phosphorus. It presents a literature review of papers that deal with methods of extraction for the evaluation of phosphorus availability in soils. The methods considered were: anion exchange resin, Olsen, Bray 1, Bray 2, Mehlich 1, Troug, Egner, water, 0,01M CaCl2, iron hydroxide impregnated filter paper (Pi) and the determinations of the E and L values. The comparison between results of soil analysis by different methods of phosphorus extraction in soils and phosphorus uptake by plants was initially made considering the coefficient of determination (r(2)) for several extractants. The following average values and corresponding numbers of articles in which the method was considered were obtained: resin, 70% (34); E value, 68%(16); L value, 65% (8); Olsen, 54% (48); Bray 1, 50% (42); Mehlich 1,46% (25); Egner, 44% (9); Bray 2, 42% (19); Water, 42% (15); Truog, 38% (13); CaCl3, 36% (13), and Morgan, 32% ( 13). The comparison of several methods, considering the pairs of results (r(2)) obtained for the extractants, that were tested together through linear correlation and average contrasts (t student test), indicated that the resin method was statistically superior to the other methods. The resin method presents the following favorable features: (a) highest values for the determinations coefficients for the correlations between P uptake by plants and soil P by the different methods, as reviewed in 72 papers; (b) it can be used in both acid and alkaline soils, which is not the case for the other most commonly used methods; (c) it reveals adequately the effect of liming on the increase of P availability in soils for crops, which is not the case of Mehlich 1, Bray I and Olsen; (d) it does not overestimate P availability in soils treated with rock phosphates, as is the case of acid extractans; (e) it is the method with the best theoretical background.
dc.description34
dc.description2
dc.description267
dc.description288
dc.languagept
dc.publisherEmpresa Brasil Pesq Agropec
dc.publisherBrasilia
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.relationPesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
dc.relationPesqui. Agropecu. Bras.
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectsoil phosphorus
dc.subjectphosphorus extractants
dc.subjectGreenhouse Evaluation
dc.subjectPhosphate
dc.subjectPlant
dc.subjectTests
dc.subjectFertilizer
dc.subjectPotassium
dc.subjectMagnesium
dc.subjectCalcium
dc.subjectSodium
dc.titlePhosphorus availability in soils, determined by different extracting procedures
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución