dc.creatorNetto, NR
dc.creatorMitre, AI
dc.creatorLima, SVC
dc.creatorFugita, OE
dc.creatorLima, ML
dc.creatorStoianovici, D
dc.creatorPatriciu, A
dc.creatorKavoussi, LR
dc.date2003
dc.dateMAY
dc.date2014-11-15T05:20:54Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:09:30Z
dc.date2014-11-15T05:20:54Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:09:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:58:05Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:58:05Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Endourology. Mary Ann Liebert Inc Publ, v. 17, n. 4, n. 217, n. 220, 2003.
dc.identifier0892-7790
dc.identifierWOS:000183223000005
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/78784
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/78784
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/78784
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1266636
dc.descriptionBackground and Purpose: To assess the safety and feasibility of transcontinental telementored and telepresence surgery, we report on two procedures carried out with participation by surgeons in Baltimore in the United States and S (a) over tildeo Paulo and Recife in Brazil. Patients and Methods: Over a period of 3 months, a laparoscopic bilateral varicocelectomy and a percutaneous renal access for a percutaneous nephrolithotomy were performed. The mentoring surgeon (LRK) was the same for both procedures. He used a 650-MHz personal computer fitted with a Z360 video COder/ DECoder (CODEC) and a Z208 communication board (Zydacron Corp, Manchester, NH) that comprise the core of the telesurgical station. In the first case, a surgical robot, AESOP 3000 (Computer Motion Inc.), was attached to a laparoscope, and the remote surgeon drove the robot via a controller on the remote computer. In the second case, another robot (Percutaneous Access to the Kidney; PAKY) was used for percutaneous needle placement into the renal collecting system. Results: The two procedures were completed successfully. In the first case, the operative time was 25 minutes, with minimal estimated blood loss. The patient was discharged home the next day. At 3-month follow-up, there was no scrotal pain or varicocele. In the second case, access to the urinary tract was achieved with the first needle pass, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy was uneventful. Blood loss was minimal, and the patient was discharged home on the second postoperative day. At 3-month follow-up, the patient was free of urinary stones and of symptoms. Conclusions: The first transcontinental telementored and telepresence urologic surgical procedures have been reported previously. The success observed with the novel surgical techniques has motivated great interest. The cases reported here demonstrate that several types of procedures can be mentored safely and effectively with telemedicine technology.
dc.descriptiono TEXTO COMPLETO DESTE ARTIGO, ESTARÁ DISPONÍVEL À PARTIR DE AGOSTO DE 2015.
dc.description17
dc.description4
dc.description217
dc.description220
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert Inc Publ
dc.publisherLarchmont
dc.publisherEUA
dc.relationJournal Of Endourology
dc.relationJ. Endourol.
dc.rightsembargo
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectLaparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
dc.subjectClinical-experience
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleTelementoring between Brazil and the United States: Initial experience
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución