dc.creatorFonseca, RB
dc.creatorBranco, CA
dc.creatorSoares, PV
dc.creatorCorrer-Sobrinho, LO
dc.creatorHaiter-Neto, F
dc.creatorFernandes-Neto, AJ
dc.creatorSoares, CJ
dc.date2006
dc.dateJUN
dc.date2014-11-20T07:32:31Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:08:54Z
dc.date2014-11-20T07:32:31Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:08:54Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:57:29Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:57:29Z
dc.identifierClinical Oral Investigations. Springer Heidelberg, v. 10, n. 2, n. 114, n. 118, 2006.
dc.identifier1432-6981
dc.identifierWOS:000239282200005
dc.identifier10.1007/s00784-005-0030-3
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/58802
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/58802
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/58802
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1266481
dc.descriptionThe aim of this study was to determine the radiodensity of base, liner and luting dental materials and to compare them with human enamel and dentin. Four classes of materials were examined: conventional glass ionomers (CG)-Vitro Cem, Ketac Bond, Vidrion F, Vidrion C; resin-modified glass ionomers (RMGI)-Fuji II LC, Vitrebond; resinous cement (RC -Rely-X ARC; and zinc phosphate cement (ZP)-Cimento LS. Five 2-mm-thick standard samples of each material and five 2-mm-thick enamel and dentin samples were produced. An aluminum step wedge served as control. Samples were positioned over a phosphor plate of Digora digital system, exposed to X-ray, and the radiodensity obtained in the software Digora for Windows 2.0. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis and Dunnett multiple comparisons test (alpha=0.05). According to statistical analysis, the following sequence in degree of radiodensity could be seen among the groups: Cimento LS (ZP) > Vitro Cem (CG) = Fuji II LC (RMGI) = Rely-X ARC (RC) = Vitrebond (RMGI) > Ketac Bond (CG) > enamel Vidrion F (CG) > Vidrion C (CG) = dentin. The presence of radiopaque fillers such as zinc, strontium, zirconium, barium, and lanthanium rather than material type seems to be the most important factor when analyzing material radiodensity. Almost all investigated materials presented an accepted radiodensity.
dc.description10
dc.description2
dc.description114
dc.description118
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelberg
dc.publisherHeidelberg
dc.publisherAlemanha
dc.relationClinical Oral Investigations
dc.relationClin. Oral Investig.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectradiodensity
dc.subjectdental materials
dc.subjectdental hard tissues
dc.subjectcomposition
dc.subjectdigital radiographs
dc.subjectAesthetic Restorative Materials
dc.subjectRadiopacity
dc.subjectCements
dc.subjectCaries
dc.titleRadiodensity of base, liner and luting dental materials
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución