Hyaluronidase versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in high-risk term and post term pregnancies

dc.creatorSurita, FGC
dc.creatorCecatti, JG
dc.creatorParpinelli, MA
dc.creatorKrupa, F
dc.creatorSilva, JLPE
dc.date2005
dc.dateMAR
dc.date2014-11-14T10:20:09Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:05:56Z
dc.date2014-11-14T10:20:09Z
dc.date2015-11-26T16:05:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:54:54Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:54:54Z
dc.identifierInternational Journal Of Gynecology & Obstetrics. Elsevier Sci Ireland Ltd, v. 88, n. 3, n. 258, n. 264, 2005.
dc.identifier0020-7292
dc.identifierWOS:000227833700004
dc.identifier10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.12.006
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/68949
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/68949
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/68949
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1265827
dc.descriptionObjective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Foley catheter and hyaluronidase for cervical ripening. Method: Randomized controlled trial where 140 pregnant women, with gestational age >= 37 weeks, indication for labor induction and an unripe cervix, were enrolled, allocated in two groups according to the method of cervical ripening before labor induction. Statistical analysis used Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney, Chi-square test, survival analysis, risk ratios and number needed to treat. Results: Time of induction, dose of oxytocin and mode of delivery had better results in the Foley catheter group. Comfort with the method was higher in the hyaluronidase group. Conclusions: Both methods were effective and safe for cervical ripening. The Foley catheter group experienced a shorter period of induction required a tower dose of oxytocin and had higher vaginal delivery rates, while the women who used hyaluronidase declared greater comfort with the method. (c) 2004 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description88
dc.description3
dc.description258
dc.description264
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ireland Ltd
dc.publisherClare
dc.publisherIrlanda
dc.relationInternational Journal Of Gynecology & Obstetrics
dc.relationInt. J. Gynecol. Obstet.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightshttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectcervical ripening
dc.subjectFoley catheter
dc.subjecthyaturonidase
dc.subjectlabor induction
dc.subjectProstaglandin E-2 Gel
dc.subjectLabor Induction
dc.subjectMisoprostol
dc.subjectOutpatient
dc.titleHyaluronidase versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in high-risk term and post term pregnancies
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución