dc.creatorTeixeira E.H.
dc.creatorDalgalarrondo P.
dc.date2005
dc.date2015-06-26T14:06:38Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:40:24Z
dc.date2015-06-26T14:06:38Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:40:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:48:54Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:48:54Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierJornal Brasileiro De Psiquiatria. , v. 54, n. 4, p. 306 - 310, 2005.
dc.identifier472085
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33644590419&partnerID=40&md5=57c3535419551f586c89bcea5bbf404e
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/93163
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/93163
dc.identifier2-s2.0-33644590419
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1264369
dc.descriptionObjective: The current paper assesses the agreement rates between the outcome of psychiatric expert opinion and the final judicial sentence and reports two typical cases, one of agreement and the other of disagreement between judges and forensic psychiatrists. Methods: All verdicts involving forensic psychiatric evaluations in circuit courts of Campinas (SP) in the year 2002 were studied. For the year 2002, from a total of 133 criminal trials that had psychiatrical evaluation in that year, 41 verdicts were studied according to its socio-demographic characteristics, clinical data, and type of crime and possibility of imputation. Results: A high rate of agreement was observed between legal capacity and judicial sentence, a result similar to that found in the literature. Conclusions: From this preliminary study it is possible to conclude that judges in the Brazilian social, cultural and legal context seem to agree completely with the assessments and conclusions reached by forensic psychiatrists in criminal forensic cases. High-profile or very severe cases appear to be exceptions to this rule. Studies with larger samples and from different regions in Brazil must be performed in order to verify whether this data is valid on a national level.
dc.description54
dc.description4
dc.description306
dc.description310
dc.descriptionAbdalla-Filho, E., Engelhardt, W., A prática da psiquiatria forense na Inglaterra e no Brasil: Uma breve comparação (2003) Rev Bras Psiquiatr, 25 (4), pp. 245-248
dc.descriptionAmaral, A., Crime e patologia (1987) J Bras Psiq, 36 (2), pp. 115-117
dc.descriptionAppelbaum, P.S., The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry (1984) Am J Psychiatry, 141, pp. 827-835
dc.descriptionCohen, C., Ramos, M.R.R., Considerações acerca da semi-imputabilidade e inimputabilidade penais resultantes de transtornos mentais e de comportamento (2002) Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminals, 39 (4), pp. 215-229
dc.descriptionOliveira, J., (1998) Código Penal Brasileiro, , São Paulo: Editera Saraiva
dc.description(1993) Classificação de Transtornos Mentais e de Comportamento Da CID 10, , Porto Alegre: Editora Artmed
dc.descriptionPikona-Sapir, A., Melamed, Y., Elizur, A., The insanity defense: Examination of the extent of congruence between psychiatric recommendation and adjudication (2001) Med Law, 20 (1), pp. 93-100
dc.descriptionReich, J.H., Tookey, L., Disagreements between court and psychiatrist on competency to stand trial (1986) J Clin Psychiatry, 47 (1), pp. 29-30
dc.descriptionRigonatti, S.P., Serafim, A.P., Barros, E.L., (2003) Temas Em Psiquiatria Forense e Psicologia Jurídica. 1 Ed., , São Paulo: Editora Vetor
dc.descriptionTaborda, J.G.V., Chalub, M., Abadalla-Filho, E., (2004) Psiquiatria Forense. 1 Ed., , São Paulo: Artmed Editora
dc.descriptionTeixeira, E.H., Barbi, K.S., Pereira, M., Folie à deux: Dupla tentativa de infanticídio (2004) Apresentado No XXII Congresso Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, p. 444. , Salvador, BA
dc.description(1976) Lei de Tóxicos - Diário Oficial Da União, , Lei no 6.368/76
dc.description(1984) Lei de Execuções Penais - Diário Oficial Da União, , Lei no 7.210/84
dc.description(1995) Juizados Especiais Civeis e Criminals - Diário Oficial Da União, , Lei no 9.099/95
dc.languagept
dc.publisher
dc.relationJornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleThe Insanity Defense: When The Judges Agree Or Disagree [perícia Psiquiátrica Criminal: Quando Os Juízes Concordam Ou Discordam]
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución