dc.creatorFerreira D.F.
dc.creatorSuslick S.B.
dc.date2002
dc.date2015-06-30T16:45:04Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:37:13Z
dc.date2015-06-30T16:45:04Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:37:13Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:45:40Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:45:40Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierInternational Conference On Health, Safety And Environment In Oil And Gas Exploration And Production. , v. , n. , p. 965 - 974, 2002.
dc.identifier
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-1642520035&partnerID=40&md5=706142989ec1c40dc0bafd1168d3b924
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/101910
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/101910
dc.identifier2-s2.0-1642520035
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1263602
dc.descriptionThe present paper describes different financial assurance systems (bonding systems) used to provide economic incentives for environmental compliance within the oil sector. Bonds may be applied in all phases of oil projects to reduce the risk of accidental, continuous, and, mainly, ex post environmental damages. The most common application of bonds is aimed at guaranteeing or funding end-of-leasing obligations, including closure and decommissioning operations. Currently, there are several forms of instruments available that could satisfy bonding requirements. This paper discusses some of the main characteristics and attributes of such instruments according to the perspectives of both regulators and industry. Since bonding requirements are currently present in several parts of the world, based on a hypothetical scenario, this paper proposes a model to enable lessees to anticipate and measure potential financial impacts of such requirements on the cash flow of oil projects. In order to provide optimum flexibility for lessees, the model offers four instrument options: (1) surety bonds, (2) a paid-in cash account, and (3) a special account allowing periodic payments. This methodology identifies surety bonds as the best instrument choice, allowing NPV maximization under the hypothetical regulatory regime.
dc.description
dc.description
dc.description965
dc.description974
dc.description(1998) Financial Security - Risk Assessment Model, , Alberta Environmental Protection, Land Reclamation Division. Internal Draft Publication. Edmonton, April, 1998
dc.descriptionAlberswerth, D., The 1872 Mining Law: Time to Pull the Plug (1991) Natural Resources & Environment, 5, p. 34
dc.descriptionAnderson, R.C., Lohof, A.Q., (1997) The United States Experience with Economic Incentives in Environmental Pollution Control Policy, , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - EPA, Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C
dc.description(2000) Brazilian Petroleum Agency - Interview with Officials, , Rio de Janeiro, 2000
dc.descriptionArney, C.E., Estimating decommissioning costs (1996) Decommissioning of Offshore Structures Conference Proceedings, p. 21. , IBC Tech. Serv. LTD., Houston
dc.descriptionAtkinson, S., Lewis, D., Determination and implementation of optimal air quality control strategies (1976) Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 3, pp. 363-380
dc.descriptionBaumol, W., Dates, W., (1988) The Theory of Environmental Policy, p. 299. , Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
dc.descriptionBohm, P., (1981) Deposit-refund Systems: Theory and Application to Environment, Conservation, and Consumer Policy, , John Hopkins Press, Baltimore
dc.descriptionBorghini, S., Bartolomeo, M., Molinari, S., Ratti, S., The role of environmental costs and liabilities in the decision-making process of oil and gas exploration and production companies (1998) SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Proceedings, , Caracas, Venezuela, 1998. SPE 46654
dc.descriptionANP: Old fields, new business (2000) Brazil Energy, 21 (337), pp. 26-27
dc.descriptionBryan, V.J., (1998) Reclamation Bonding for Coal Mining Operations, , US Department of Interior. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (not published)
dc.descriptionColeman, H., Decommissioning offshore installations: A global problem - A costly solution? (1997) Management Report, Executive Summary, , http://www.ftenergy.com/oil/oilrs28.htm, [27/02/1999]
dc.descriptionConrad, K., An Incentive scheme for optimal pricing and environmental protection (1987) J. Int. Theor. Econ., 143, pp. 402-421
dc.descriptionCornwell, L., Costanza, R., An experimental analysis of the effectiveness of an environmental assurance bonding system on player behavior in a simulated firm (1994) Ecological Economics, 11, pp. 213-226
dc.descriptionCornwell, L., (1997) Policy Tools for Environmentally Sustainable Development: Environmental Bonds and Participatory Modeling, , PH.D. Dissertation - University of Maryland at College Park. UMI Dissertation Services
dc.descriptionCostanza, R., D'Arge, R., DeGroot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Van den Belt, M., The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital (1997) Nature, 387. , 15 May
dc.descriptionDella, G.A., Offshore facility management: How to render rational the underwater inspection and removal planning (1997) Offshore Mech. and Arctic Eng. Int. Conference Proceedings, 2, pp. 251-260. , Yokohama, Japan
dc.descriptionGuidance notes for industry on the decommissioning of offshore installations and pipelines (2000) DTI Report, , http://www.og.dti.gov.uk, June. [On-line] [06/02/2000]
dc.descriptionFerreira, D.F., Suslick, S.B., A new approach for accessing offshore decommissioning: A decision model for performance bonds (2000) SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Proceedings, , Stavanger, Norway, 2000. SPE 61219
dc.descriptionFerreira, D.F., Suslick, S.B., Identifying Potential Impacts of Bonding Instruments on Offshore Oil Projects (2001) Resources Policy Journal, 27, pp. 43-52. , 2001
dc.descriptionGriffin, W.S., Evolution of the global decommissioning regulatory regime (1998) Offshore Technology Conference Proceedings, , Phillips Petroleum Company. Houston, 1998, OTC 8784
dc.descriptionJohnson, M., Performance bonds (1986) A Final Report Prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency, , Office of Waste Programs Enforcement, contract number 15-4040-00. Washington D.C
dc.descriptionLeving, M., Elman, B., The case for environmental incentives (1990) The Environmental Forum, 7-11
dc.descriptionMiller, G.C., Use of environmental surety instruments in mining (2000) International Council on Metals and the Environment Newsletter, 8 (1). , 2000
dc.description(1998) US Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region. Notice to Lessees and Operators of Federal Oil and Gas and Sulphur Leases in the Outer Continental Shelf, , MMS - NTL 98-18N. MMS Publication, December 28, 1998
dc.description(2000) Interview with MMS Officials - New Orleans, , 2000
dc.descriptionDecommissioning and removal in Norway (1993) IBC - Decommissioning and Removal of Offshore Structures Conference Proceedings, , Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. September, 1993, London
dc.description(2000) Norwegian Petroleum Directorate - Interview with Officials, , Stavanger, 2000
dc.description(1998) Offshore Decommissioning Communications Project, , http://www.oilrigdisposal-options.com, International offshore oil and gas industry, June 30, [On-line], [18.03.99]
dc.descriptionPane, S.Z., Hendarjo, G., The challenges of abandonment and disposal of offshore structures in Indonesia (1998) Joint Workshop on Decommissioning of Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms Proceedings, , Jakarta, Indonesia
dc.descriptionPatin, S., (1999) Environmental Impact of the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry, pp. 53-55. , EcoMonitor Publishing, East Northport, NY
dc.descriptionPerrings, C., Environmental bonds and the incentive to research activities involving uncertain future effects (1989) Ecol. Econ., 1, pp. 95-110
dc.descriptionEkofisk I disposal: Impact assessment environmental and societal impacts (2000) Internal Report, , Phillips Norway. Stavanger, Norway
dc.descriptionPoremski, H.J., Life cycle assessment - Development planning through decommissioning (1998) Umweltbundesamt, , Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin, Germany, Offshore Technology Conference Proceedings, 1998, Houston, OTC 8788
dc.descriptionPrasthofer, P.H., Decommissioning technology challenges (1998) Offshore Technology Conference Proceedings, , Offshore Decommissioning Communications Project (ODCP)/Exxon, Houston, OTC 8785
dc.description(1997) Socio-economic Impacts of Varying Decommissioning Options, , International offshore oil and gas industry. The offshore decommissioning communications project, Prognos, Not Published
dc.descriptionRobinson, G., Ireland, S., The cost of abandonment (1995) Strategies for Successful Abandonment Conference Proceedings, p. 7. , IBC Tech. Derv. LTD. London, England, 1995
dc.descriptionRowe, M., (1987) Guarantees, Standby Letters of Credit and other Securities, , Euromoney Publications, London
dc.descriptionStollery, K., Environmental controls in extractive industries (1985) Land Econ., 61, pp. 136-144
dc.descriptionTwachtman, R., Offshore-platform decommissioning perceptions change, abandoning offshore platforms (1997) Oil & Gas Journal, , Dec. 1997
dc.descriptionThe Auris report: An assessment of the environmental impacts of the decommissioning options for the oil and gas installations in the UK North Sea (1995) Ukooa Ltd.'s Internal Report, , not published
dc.descriptionWatson, T., Re-use and disposal considerations (1998) Joint Workshop on Decommissioning of Offshore Oil and Gas Platform Proceedings, , Amoco Exploration Company, Jakarta, Indonesia
dc.descriptionWebber, B., Webber, D., Promoting economic incentives for environmental protection in the surface mining control and reclamation act of 1977: An analysis of the design and implementation of reclamation performance bonds (1985) Nat. Resourc. J., 25, pp. 390-414
dc.languageen
dc.publisher
dc.relationInternational Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleFinancial Assurance Bonds: An Incentive Mechanism For Environmental Compliance In The Oil Sector
dc.typeActas de congresos


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución