dc.creatorRomano S.V.
dc.creatorMetrebian S.E.
dc.creatorVaz F.
dc.creatorMuller V.
dc.creatorLevi D'Ancona C.A.
dc.creatorCosta De Souza E.A.
dc.creatorNakamura F.
dc.date2009
dc.date2015-06-26T13:36:25Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:36:26Z
dc.date2015-06-26T13:36:25Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:36:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:44:56Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:44:56Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierActas Urologicas Espanolas. , v. 33, n. 3, p. 309 - 314, 2009.
dc.identifier2104806
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-67849121619&partnerID=40&md5=6121bcbca62b9993266559bd1fa9de0f
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/92534
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/92534
dc.identifier2-s2.0-67849121619
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1263439
dc.descriptionObjective: To communicate long- term results of the multicentre phase III trial post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) treated with an adjustable male sling1. Patients and Methods: 48 PPI patients were included in this trial from april 2003 to September 2004. 39 post radical prostatectomy and 9 post adenomectomy. 19 wore 5 pads per day (3-8) each weight 83gr (17-198). 29 wore condom catheter or penile clamp The Argus was implanted through perineal approach. Using needles, the sling was transferred to the abdominal wall where it was adjusted by washers. The adjustment was done with retrograde urethral pressure from 45 to 55 cm water. Clinical data were updated till September 2007. The mean follow-up was 45 months (36-54) and median age was 67 years (52-77). The evaluation was: the ICIQ-SF score and qualification as Dry: no pads, Improved: 1 pad and Failed: 2 or more pads in 24 hr, including those with slings removed. Results: 47 were evaluated, resulting: 31 (66%) Dry, 6 (12.8%) Improved and 10 (21%) Failed. The ICIQ-SF score changed from 19.5 to 6. Of the 31 dry pts, 5 required one adjustment. 10 pts failed, 9 after sling removal, 6 due to erosion and 3 for infection. One patient failed with the sling in place, 6 erosions were registered: 4 in the urethra, 1 into the bladder and 1 through the abdominal wall. Perineal pain persisted in 2. One patient was excluded, died in September 2006. Conclusions: Argus™ has demonstrated its efficacy in long- term follow-up. The social continence rate was about 80%. The important comDlication was erosion or infection.
dc.description33
dc.description3
dc.description309
dc.description314
dc.descriptionRomano, S.V., Metrebian, S.E., Vaz, F., Muller, V., Levi D'Ancona, C.A., Costa De Souza, E.A., Nakamura, F., An adjustable male sling for treating urinary Incontinence after prostatectomy - A phase 111 multi-centre trial (2006) BJU Int, 97 (3), pp. 533-539
dc.descriptionShaeffer, A., Clemens, Q., Ferrari, M., Stamey, T., The male bulbourethral. Sling procedure for post-radical prostatectomy Incontinence (1998) J Urol, 159, pp. 510-1515
dc.descriptionTse, V., Stone, A., Incontinence after prostatectomy: The artificial urlnay sphincter (2003) BJU Int, 92 (9), pp. 886-889
dc.descriptionUrban, M., Heracek, J., Romano, S.V., New sugical method of trea-tement for male Incontinence with argus adjustable male sling (2006) Urologe Pro Praxl, 1, pp. 20-23
dc.descriptionGalllstl, H., Shlarp, O., Hiibner, W.A., Argus: Elne neuartlge adjus-tlerbare shllnge In der theraple der postprostatektomlelncontl-nenz (2006) Urologe A, 45 (SUPPL. 1), pp. S43
dc.descriptionSandoval, J.C., Salazar, A., Oyanedel, P., Verdugo, F., Romano, S.V., Sling bulbouretral para el tratamiento de la Incontlnencla urinaria de esfuerzo mascullna post cirugia prostatlca (2007) Rev. Chllena De Urologla., 72 (2), pp. 185-188
dc.descriptionReges, R., Dancona, C., Rels, L., Mlyakoa, R., Netto, N., Treatmet of Male Urinary Incontinence with Male Sling: Long Term Follow-up Ics 2006, , Abst 361
dc.descriptionKaufman, J.J., A New operation for male Incontinence (1970) Surg Gynecol Obstet., 131 (2), pp. 295-299
dc.descriptionKaufman, J.J., Surgical treatment of post-prostatectomy Incontinence: Use of the penile crura to compress the bulbous urethra (1972) J Urol, 107 (2), pp. 293-297
dc.descriptionKaufman, J.J., Treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary Incontinence using a silicone gel prosthesis (1973) Br J Urol., 45 (6), pp. 646-653
dc.descriptionComlter, C.V., Sullivan, M.P., Yalla, S.V., Retrograde leak point pressure for evaluating post-radical prostatectomy Incontinence (1997) Urology., 49 (2), pp. 231-236
dc.descriptionStamey, T., Perineal compression of the corpum spongiosum of the bulbar urethra. An operation for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence (1994) J Urol(Part 2), 151 (PART. 2). , 490A, Abstract 1049
dc.descriptionRomano, S.V., Tecnica quinirgica del sling masculino (2005) Rev. Arg. De Urol., 70 (3)
dc.descriptionSousa-Escandon, A., Rodriguez Gomez, J.I., Uribarri Gonzalez, C., Marquez-Queimadelos, A., Externally readjustable sling on male stress urinary incontinence treatment: Point of technique and preliminary results (2004) J Endourol., 18 (1), pp. 113-118
dc.languagees
dc.publisher
dc.relationActas Urologicas Espanolas
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleLong Term Results Of A Phase Iii Multicentre Trial Of The Adjustable Male Sling For Treating Urinary Incontinence After Prostatectomy: Minimum 3 Years [resultados A Largo Plazo Del Estudio Multicéntrico Fase Iii Del Tratamiento De La Incontinencia De Orina Post Prostatectomia Con Un Sling Masculino Ajustable: Seguimiento Minimo 3 Años]
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución