dc.creatorFreire D.M.C.
dc.creatorCecatti J.G.
dc.creatorPaiva C.S.M.
dc.date2010
dc.date2015-06-26T12:41:57Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:31:26Z
dc.date2015-06-26T12:41:57Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:31:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:39:53Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:39:53Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierRevista De Saude Publica. , v. 44, n. 6, p. 1031 - 1038, 2010.
dc.identifier348910
dc.identifier10.1590/S0034-89102010005000044
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78649499992&partnerID=40&md5=21256f683703107bb6318c1074418f66
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/91514
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/91514
dc.identifier2-s2.0-78649499992
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1262228
dc.descriptionObjective: To validate a new symphysis-fundal curve for screening fetal growth deviations and to compare its performance with the standard curve adopted by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Methods: Observational study including a total of 753 low-risk pregnant women with gestational age above 27 weeks between March to October 2006 in the city of João Pessoa, Northeastern Brazil. Symphisys-fundal was measured using a standard technique recommended by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Estimated fetal weight assessed through ultrasound using the Brazilian fetal weight chart for gestational age was the gold standard. A subsample of 122 women with neonatal weight measurements was taken up to seven days after estimated fetal weight measurements and symphisys-fundal classification was compared with Lubchenco growth reference curve as gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. The McNemar χ2 test was used for comparing sensitivity of both symphisys-fundal curves studied. Results: The sensitivity of the new curve for detecting small for gestational age fetuses was 51.6% while that of the Brazilian Ministry of Health reference curve was significantly lower (12.5%). In the subsample using neonatal weight as gold standard, the sensitivity of the new reference curve was 85.7% while that of the Brazilian Ministry of Health was 42.9% for detecting small for gestational age. Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of the new curve for detecting small for gestational age fetuses was significantly higher than that of the Brazilian Ministry of Health reference curve.
dc.description44
dc.description6
dc.description1031
dc.description1038
dc.descriptionAtalah, E., Castillo, C., Castro, R., Aldea, A., Propuesta de un nuevo estándar de evaluación nutricional en embarazadas (1997) Rev Med Chil, 125 (12), pp. 1429-1436
dc.descriptionBais, J.M., Eskes, M., Pel, M., Bonsel, G.J., Bleker, O.P., Effectiveness of detection of intrauterine growth retardation by abdominal palpation as screening test in a low risk population: an observational study (2004) Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 116 (2), pp. 164-169. , DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.037
dc.descriptionBaschat, A.A., Hecher, K., Fetal growth restriction due to placental disease (2004) Semin Perinatol, 28 (1), pp. 67-80. , DOI:10.1053/j.semperi.2003.10.014
dc.descriptionBelizán, J.M., Villar, J., Nardin, J.C., Malamud, J., De Vicurna, L.S., Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation by a simple clinical method: measurement of uterine height (1978) Am J Obstet Gynecol, 131 (6), pp. 643-646
dc.descriptionCecatti, J.G., Machado, M.R.M., Santos, F.F.A., Marussi, E.F., Curva dos valores normais de peso fetal estimado por ultra-sonografia segundo a idade gestacional (2000) Cad Saude Publica, 16 (4), pp. 1083-1090. , DOI:10.1590/S0102-311X2000000400026
dc.descriptionCecatti, J.G., Machado, M.R.M., Krupa, F.G., Figueiredo, P.G., Pires, H.M.B., Validação da curva normal de peso fetal estimado pela ultra-sonografia para o diagnóstico do peso neonatal (2003) Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 25 (1), pp. 35-40. , DOI:10.1590/S0100-72032003000100006
dc.descriptionCetin, I., Foidart, J.M., Miozzo, M., Raun, T., Jansson, T., Tsatsaris, V., Fetal growth restriction: a workshop report (2004) Placenta, 25 (8-9), pp. 753-757. , DOI:10.1016/j.placenta.2004.02.004
dc.descriptionEngstron, J.L., Sittler, C.P., Fundal height measurement Part 5:The effect of clinician bias on fundal height measurement (1994) J Nurse Midwif, 39 (3), pp. 130-141. , DOI:10.1016/0091-2182(94)90095-7
dc.descriptionFescina, R.H., Quevedo, C., Martell, M., Nieto, F., Schwarcz, R., Altura uterina como método para predecir el crecimiento fetal (1984) Bol Oficina Sanit Panam, 96 (5), pp. 377-386
dc.descriptionFreire, D.M.C., Paiva, C.S.M., Coelho, E.A.C., Cecatti, J.G., Curva da altura uterina por idade gestacional em gestantes de baixo risco (2006) Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 28 (1), pp. 3-9. , DOI:10.1590/S0100-72032006000100002
dc.descriptionFreire, D.M.C., Cecatti, J.G., Paiva, C.S.M., Correlação entre peso fetal estimado por ultrassonografia e peso neonatal (2010) Rev Brasil Ginecol Obstet, 32 (1), pp. 4-10. , DOI:10.1590/S0100-72032010000100002
dc.descriptionGhate, M., Pratinidhi, A., Gupte, A., Risk prediction charts for low birth weight (1996) Indian Pediatr, 33 (1), pp. 15-18
dc.descriptionHadlock, F.P., Harrist, R.B., Martinez-Poyer, J., In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard (1991) Radiology, 181 (1), pp. 129-133
dc.descriptionJahn, A., Razum, O., Berle, P., Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany: Low sensitivity and questionable benefit for diagnosed cases (1998) Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 77 (6), pp. 643-648. , DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0412.1998.770611.x
dc.descriptionKayem, G., Grangé, G., Bréart, G., Goffinet, F., Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term (2009) Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 34 (5), pp. 566-571. , DOI:10.1002/uog.6378
dc.descriptionLindqvist, P.G., Molin, J., Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? (2005) Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 25 (3), pp. 258-264. , DOI:10.1002/uog.1806
dc.descriptionLubchenco, L.O., Hansman, C., Byd, E., Dressler, M., Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation (1963) Pediatrics, 32, pp. 793-800
dc.descriptionMartinelli, S., Bittar, R.E., Zugaib, M., Proposta de nova curva de altura uterina para gestações entre a 20a e a 42a semana (2001) Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 23 (4), pp. 235-241. , DOI:10.1590/S0100-72032001000400006
dc.descriptionMartinelli, S., Bittar, R.E., Zugaib, M., Predição da restrição do crescimento fetal pela medida da altura uterina (2004) Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 26 (5), pp. 383-389. , DOI: 10.1590/S0100-72032004000500007
dc.descriptionNeilson, J.P., Symphysis-fundal height measurement in pregnancy (2000) Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 0 (2), pp. CD000944
dc.descriptionOppermann, M.L.R., Duncan, B.B., Mengue, S.S., Ramos, J.G.L., Serruya, S.J., Schmidt, M.I., Distribuição da altura uterina ao longo da gestação em uma coorte brasileira: comparação com a curva de referência do Centro Latino-Americano de Perinatologia (2006) Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 28 (9), pp. 513-522. , DOI:10.1590/S0100-72032006000900003
dc.descriptionOwen, P., Farrell, T., Hardwick, J.C., Khan, K.S., Relationship between customised birth weight centiles and neonatal anthropometric features of growth restriction (2002) BJOG, 109 (6), pp. 658-662
dc.descriptionVillar, J., Belizan, J.M., The evolution of the methods used in the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation (1986) Obstet Gynecol Survey, 41 (4), pp. 187-199. , DOI:10.1097/00006254-198604000-00001
dc.languagept
dc.publisher
dc.relationRevista de Saude Publica
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleSymphysis-fundal Height Curve In The Diagnosis Of Fetal Growth Deviations [curva De Altura Uterina Por Idade Gestacional E Diagnóstico De Desvios Do Crescimento Fetal]
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución