The United States And The Regional Human Rights Protection Mechanisms [os Estados Unidos E Os Mecanismos Regionais De Proteção Dos Direitos Humanos]

dc.creatorMaciel D.A.
dc.creatorFerreira M.M.A.
dc.creatorKoerner A.
dc.date2013
dc.date2015-06-25T19:15:16Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:12:54Z
dc.date2015-06-25T19:15:16Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:12:54Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:22:59Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:22:59Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierLua Nova. , v. , n. 90, p. 271 - 295, 2013.
dc.identifier1026445
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84893431633&partnerID=40&md5=7a84995bf4d0e159f2655d54d0d6ce8d
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/89219
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/89219
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84893431633
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1258497
dc.descriptionWhat would be the performance of the United States of America in the Organization of American States (OAS) in the accused position by human rights violations? The inquiry was starting point of the empirical research, presented in the article, about the accusations against the United States of America to the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights IACHR/OAS. The complaints were analyzed from the perspective of institutions and collective mobilization, thus emphasizing the character, regulatory and strategic at the same time, dynamic and relational, of human rights. Although the IACHR does not exert binding effect on national authorities, tensions in domestic politics has been generated by positive answers to the growing activism of citizens in submission of complaints, since the 1990s, in challenging the behavior of U.S. governmental institutions.
dc.description
dc.description90
dc.description271
dc.description295
dc.descriptionApodaca, C., (2006) Understanding U.S. Human Rights Policy: A paradoxical legacy., , New York: Routledge
dc.descriptionSakalauska, B.K.E., Belangero, J.S., (2013) Suprema Corte norte-americana, Comissão Interamericana de Direitos Humanos e Corte Internacional de Justiça no caso Medellín, , Paper apresentado no IV Encontro Nacional da Associação Brasileira de Relações Internacionais, Belo Horizonte, 22 a 26 de julho
dc.descriptionBenvenisti, E., Judicial misgivings regarding the application of International Law: an analysis of attitudes of National Courts (1993) European Journal of International Law, 4, pp. 159-183
dc.descriptionBenvenisti, E., Reclaiming democracy: the strategic uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts (2008) The American Journal of International Law, 102, pp. 241-275
dc.descriptionBilder, R.B., Integrating International Human Rights Law into domestic law: US experience (1981) Houston Journal of International Law, 4, pp. 1-12
dc.descriptionChesney, R.M., Disaggregating deference: the judicial power and executive treaty interpretations (2007) Iowa Law Review, 1, pp. 1723-1782
dc.descriptionForsythe, D.P., (2000) Human Rights in international relations, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
dc.descriptionFranck, T.M., Courts and foreign policy (1991) Foreign Policy, 83, pp. 66-87
dc.descriptionGoldsmith, J., Should International Human Rights Law trump US domestic law? (2000) Chicago Journal of International Law, 1 (2), pp. 327-340
dc.descriptionHenkin, L., US Ratification of human rights conventions: the ghost of Senator Bricker" (1995) The American Journal of International Law, 89 (2), pp. 341-350
dc.descriptionhttp://www.oas.org/en/iachr/, IAHCR-Inter American Human Rights Comission. Disponível em:Ignatieff, M., (2005) American exceptionalism and human rights, , Princeton: Princeton University Press. Acesso em: 6 out. 2012
dc.descriptionhttp://infosurhoy.com/cocoon/saii/xhtml/pt/newsbriefs/saii/newsbriefs/2012/06/05/newsbrief-05, INFOSUR HOY. ONGs rejeitam reforma da CIDH. Disponível em:. Acesso em: 6 out. 2012Keck, M., Sikkink, K., (1998) Activists beyond borders, , Ithaca: Cornell University Press
dc.descriptionKing, K.L., Meernik, J., The Supreme Court and the powers of the Executive: the adjudication of foreign policy (1999) Political Research Quarterly, 52, pp. 801-24
dc.descriptionKuhner, T.K., Human rights treaties in U.S. law: the status quo, its underlying bases, and pathway for change (2003) Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 13, pp. 419-475
dc.descriptionLo, Y., (2005) Human Rights litigation promoting International Law in U.S. Courts, , LFB Scholarly
dc.descriptionMcCann, M., Poder Judiciário e mobilização do direito: uma perspectiva dos 'usuários' (2010), pp. 175-96. , Revista EMARF, Cadernos Temáticos: Seminário Nacional sobre Justiça Constitucional, dezPaust, J.J., Customary International law and human rights treaties are law of United States (1999) Michigan Journal of International Law, 20, pp. 301-36
dc.descriptionPearlstein, D.N., After deference: formalizing the judicial power for Foreign Relations Law (2011) University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 159, pp. 783-852
dc.descriptionRogoff, M., Interpretation of international agreements by domestic Courts and the politics of international treaty relations: reflections on some recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court (1996) American University International Law Review, 11, pp. 559-685
dc.descriptionSikkink, K., (2004) Mixed signals: U.S. Human Rights Policy and Latin America, , Ithaca e London: Cornell University Press
dc.descriptionSlaughter, A.M., A brave new judicial world (2005) American exceptionalism and Human Rights, , In: IGNATIEFF, M. (ed.).Princeton: Princeton University Press
dc.descriptionTauber, A., (2010) International Law in the Supreme Court of the United States: an empirical analysis, , South Carolina: University of South Carolina
dc.descriptionTolley, H., Interest group litigation to enforce human rights (1991) Political Science Quarterly, 105 (4), pp. 617-638
dc.descriptionVagts, D., Treaty interpretation and the new American ways of law reading (2004) European Journal of International Law, 4, pp. 472-505
dc.descriptionWaters Melissa, A., Creeping monism: the judicial trend toward interpretative incorporation of human rights treaties (2007) Columbia Law Review, 107, pp. 628-705
dc.descriptionWilson, R., The United States' position on the death penalty in the Inter-American Human Rights System (2002) Santa Clara Law Review, 42, pp. 11-59
dc.languagept
dc.publisher
dc.relationLua Nova
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleThe United States And The Regional Human Rights Protection Mechanisms [os Estados Unidos E Os Mecanismos Regionais De Proteção Dos Direitos Humanos]
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución