dc.creator | Koerner A. | |
dc.date | 2013 | |
dc.date | 2015-06-25T19:15:00Z | |
dc.date | 2015-11-26T15:12:35Z | |
dc.date | 2015-06-25T19:15:00Z | |
dc.date | 2015-11-26T15:12:35Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-28T22:22:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-28T22:22:39Z | |
dc.identifier | | |
dc.identifier | Novos Estudos Cebrap. , v. , n. 96, p. 69 - 85, 2013. | |
dc.identifier | 1013300 | |
dc.identifier | | |
dc.identifier | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84886822704&partnerID=40&md5=95b836a22b27fdb92c8a2e0a1f2ddb72 | |
dc.identifier | http://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/89180 | |
dc.identifier | http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/89180 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-84886822704 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1258413 | |
dc.description | The article analyzes the academic debate about judicial activism. It criticizes their focus on the problem of justices' individual autonomy in the decision-making process and their normative purpose in defining the Judiciary's proper role in a democratic constitutional order. The debate reduces the institutional dimension of tribunals and simplifies the relationships between judiciary practice and its political context. The article proposes a scheme for the analysis between judicial decisions and politics, based on the concepts of governmental regime and jurisprudential regime. The final section proposes a preliminary analysis of the changes in the judicial review of the stf after 1988. | |
dc.description | | |
dc.description | 96 | |
dc.description | 69 | |
dc.description | 85 | |
dc.description | Kmiec, K., Origin and current meanings of 'judicial activism' (2004) California Law Review, 92 (5), pp. 1441-1477. , out | |
dc.description | Para limitar o número de referências, foram selecionadas três obras que adotam abordagens e argumentos distintos sobre o, tema., Ramos, Elival (2010) Ativismo judicial, parâmetros, dogmáticos, , São Paulo: Saraiva | |
dc.description | Barroso, L.R., Judicialização, ativismo judicial e legitimidade democrática Revista EMARF, Cadernos Temáticos: Seminário Nacional sobre Justiça Constitucional, dez (2010), pp. 389-406Miarelli, M.M.L., Rogério, M., Ativismo judicial e a efetivação de direitos no Supremo Tribunal Federal (2012), Porto Alegre: Sergio Antonio FabrisWolfe, C., Judicial activism: bulwark of freedom or precarious scurity? (1997), p. 19. , Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield, 2 eDonald Horowitz, A.B., Kurland, P., Keck, T., The most activist Supreme Court in history: the road to modern judicial conservatism (2004), pp. 140-141. , Chicago: The University of Chicago PressBerger, R., Government by Judiciary (1977), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressMiller, A., In defense of judicial activism" In: Halpern, S. e Lamb. C. (orgs.) (1982) Supreme Court activism and restraint, pp. 167-200. , Lexington: Lexington Books | |
dc.description | Roosevelt III, K., The myth of judicial activism: making sense of Supreme Court decisions (2006), p. 174. , Yale: Yale University PressLindquist, S., Cross, F., (2009) Measuring judicial activism, p. 25. , Oxford: Oxford University Press | |
dc.description | Canon, B., A framework for the judicial activism" , pp. 385-419. , In: Halpern e Lamb, op. citJackson, D., Original intent, strict construction and judicial review: a framework for comparative analysis (1992) Comparative judicial review and public policy, pp. 179-199. , Jackson, D. e Tate, C. Neal (orgs. ), Westport: Greenwood | |
dc.description | Lindquist, O., Cross, O., citYung, C.R., Flexing judicial muscle: an empirical study of judicial activism in the Federal Courts Northwestern University Law Review, 105 (1), pp. 1-60. , 201 | |
dc.description | Tate, C.N., Comparative judicial review and public policy: concepts and overview , pp. 3-15. , In: Jackson e Tate, op. citHolland, K., Judicial activism in comparative perspective (1991), Nova York: St. MartinProposto como tema de um seminário internacional em 1992, publicado em uma revista (International Political Science Review (1994) The global expansion of Judicial Power, 15 (2). , e, em seguida, em livro, (Tate, C. N. e Vallinder, T. . Nova York: New York University Press, 1995), Proposto como tema de um seminário internacional em publicado em uma revista (International Political Science Review | |
dc.description | Prillaman, W.C., The judiciary and democratic decay in Latin America: declining confidence in the rule of law (2000), pp. 75-110. , Wesport: PraegerSantiso, C., Economic reform and judicial governance in Brazil: balancing independence with accountability In: Gloppen, Siri, Gargarella, Roberto, Skaar, E. (orgs. ). Democratization and the Judiciary: the accountability function of courts in new democracies (2004), pp. 161-180. , Londres: Frank CassVianna, L.W., A judicialização da política e das relações sociais no Brasil (1999), Rio de Janeiro: RevanCarvalho, E., Revisão Abstrata da legislação e judicialização da política no Brasil (2005), São Paulo: tese de doutorado, Departamento de Ciência Política, fflch/uspPacheco, C.C., O Supremo Tribunal Federal e a reforma do Estado: uma análise das Ações Diretas de Inconstitucionalidade julgadas no primeiro mandato de Fernando Henrique Cardoso (1995-1998) (2006), Campinas: tese de doutorado, Departamento de Ciência Política, UnicampKmiec, O., , p. 1477. , citHalpern, O., Lamb, O., citFriedman, B., The birth of an academic obsession: the history of the contermajoritarian difficulty (2002) Yale Law Journal, 112 (2), pp. 153-259. , 156-67) | |
dc.description | Roosevelt III, O., , p. 6. , citGreen, C., An intellectual history of judicial activism (2009) Emory Law Journal, 58 (5), pp. 1195-1263. , (p. 1206 e 1222) | |
dc.description | Lovell, G., Legislative deferrals. Statutory ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American democracy (2003), pp. 3-33. , Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressWhittington, K.E., Political foundations of Judicial Supremacy: the Presidency, the Supreme Court, and constitutional leadership (2007), U.S. history. New Jersey: Princeton University PressClayton, C., The politics of justice, The Attorney General and the making of legal policy (1992), pp. 4-6. , Nova York: M. E. SharpeCaldeira, G.A., McCrone, D., Of time and judicial activism: a study of the US Supreme Court (1800-1973) , pp. 103-128. , Halpern e Lamb, op. citGates, J., The Supreme Court and partisan realignement: a macro and microlevel perspective (1992), pp. 133-134. , Boulder: WestviewMcCann, M., Poder Judiciário e mobilização do direito: uma perspectiva dos 'usuários'". Revista EMARF, Cadernos Temáticos: Seminário Nacional sobre Justiça Constitucional, número especial, dez (2010), pp. 175-196Bickel, A., The least dangerous branch: the Supreme Court at the bar of politics (1986), pp. 256-257. , New Haven: Yale University Press, [1962]Chemerinsky, E., The conservative assault on the Constitution (2010), pp. 16-17. , Nova York: Simon & SchusterKeck, O., , p. 108. , cit.143 | |
dc.description | 156-7Clayton, O., , pp. 4-6. , cit. 120-71Teles, S.M., The rise of conservative legal movement: the battle for control of the law (2008), p. 179. , Princeton: Princeton University PressKmiec, O., , p. 1451. , citBickel, O., , pp. 16-17. , citLindquist, O., Cross, O., , p. 22. , citTeles, O., , p. 179. , cit 220-1, 279Keck, O., , pp. 140-141. , citChemerinsky, O., , pp. 16-17. , citKeck, O., , p. 108. , cit, 143, 156-7Rose, N., Governing 'advanced' liberal democracies. In: Barry, A., Osborne, T. e outros (orgs. ). Foucault and political reason: liberalism, neo--liberalism and the rationalities of government (1996), pp. 37-65. , Londres: UCL PressCarvalho, O., citPacheco, O., citVianna e outros, op. citPogrebinschi, T., Judicialização ou representação? Política, direito e democracia no Brasil (2011), Rio de Janeiro: ElsevierSunfeld, C.A., Controle de constitucionalidade e judicialização: o STF frente à sociedade e aos poderes (2010), Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências HumanasCosta, A., A quem interessa o controle concentrado de constitucionalidade? Um perfil das decisões de procedência em ADIs (2010), 7° Encontro da Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política, Recife | |
dc.language | pt | |
dc.publisher | | |
dc.relation | Novos Estudos CEBRAP | |
dc.rights | aberto | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.title | Ativismo Judicial? Jurisprudência Constitucional E Política No Stf Pós-88 | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |