Considering The Risks And Benefits Of Intrauterine Devices: Should Clinician Advice Now Be Changed?

dc.creatorBahamondes L.
dc.creatorBahamondes M.V.
dc.date2013
dc.date2015-06-25T19:10:45Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:08:18Z
dc.date2015-06-25T19:10:45Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:08:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:18:42Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:18:42Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierClinical Practice. , v. 10, n. 1, p. 19 - 30, 2013.
dc.identifier20449038
dc.identifier10.2217/cpr.12.72
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84871564080&partnerID=40&md5=0384ab90bea43fbea858db3e616880fc
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/88552
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/88552
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84871564080
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1257637
dc.descriptionIntrauterine contraceptives (IUCs) are the most widely used contraceptive method in the world, the two most common models currently in use being the TCu380A intrauterine device and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. IUCs and subdermal implants are referred to as 'long-acting reversible contraceptives' because they provide contraception for at least 3 years with a single intervention. Both IUCs and the contraceptive implant have very low rates of contraceptive failure, these rates being similar in women over and under 21 years of age. They are safe, with few side effects, have a high continuation rate and can be used irrespective of age or parity. However, even now, many healthcare professionals discourage the use of these devices by adolescents, young women and nulligravidas, although the WHO makes no restrictions in this respect. IUCs represent an excellent tool for preventing unplanned pregnancy and should be considered as a first-line contraceptive choice for any woman with no medical contraindications. © 2013 Future Medicine Ltd.
dc.description10
dc.description1
dc.description19
dc.description30
dc.descriptionGrimes, D.A., Forgettable contraception (2009) Contraception, 80 (6), pp. 497-499
dc.descriptionBahamondes, L., Faundes, A., Sobreira-Lima, B., Lui-Filho, J.F., Pecci, P., Matera, S., TCu 380A IUD: A reversible permanent contraceptive method in women over 35 years of age (2005) Contraception, 72 (5), pp. 337-341. , DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.12.026, PII S0010782405001587
dc.descriptionSivin, I., Utility and drawbacks of continuous use of a copper T IUD for 20 years (2007) Contraception, 75 (6 SUPPL.), pp. S70-S75. , DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.01.016, PII S0010782407000765
dc.descriptionLuukkainen, T., Toivonen, J., Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine IUD as a method of contraception with therapeutic properties (1995) Contraception, 52 (5), pp. 269-276
dc.descriptionHidalgo, M.M., Hidalgo-Regina, C., Bahamondes, M.V., Monteiro, I., Petta, C.A., Bahamondes, L., Serum levonorgestrel levels and endometrial thickness during extended use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (2009) Contraception, 80 (1), pp. 84-89
dc.descriptionWinner, B., Peipert, J.F., Zhao, Q., Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception (2012) N. Engl. J. Med, 366 (21), pp. 1998-2007
dc.descriptionBednarek, P.H., Jensen, J.T., Safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the contraceptive and non-contraceptive uses of the LNG-IUS (2009) Int. J. Womens Health, 1, pp. 45-58
dc.descriptionHatcher, R.A., Trussell, J., Nelson, A., Cates, W., Stewart, F., Kowal, D., (2008) Contraceptive Technology, , (19th Edition). PDR Network, NJ USA
dc.descriptionSivin, I., Stern, J., Diaz, S., Rates and outcomes of planned pregnancy after use of Norplant capsules, Norplant II rods, or levonorgestrel-releasing or copper TCu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices (1992) Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 166 (4), pp. 1208-1213
dc.descriptionLyus, R., Lohr, P., Prager, S., Board of the Society of Family Planning Use of the Mirena levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and Paragard CuT380A intrauterine devices in nulliparous women (2010) Contraception, 81 (5), pp. 367-371
dc.descriptionStubbs, E., Schamp, A., The evidence is in. Why are IUDs still out?: Family physicians' perceptions of risk and indications (2008) Canadian Family Physician, 54 (4), pp. 560-566. , http://www.cfp.ca/cgi/reprint/54/4/560
dc.descriptionWellings, K., Zhihong, Z., Krentel, A., Barrett, G., Glasier, A., Attitudes towards long-acting reversible methods of contraception in general practice in the UK (2007) Contraception, 76 (3), pp. 208-214. , DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.05.085, PII S0010782407002879
dc.descriptionStanwood, N.L., Garrett, J.M., Konrad, T.R., Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: A survey of attitudes and practice (2002) Obstetrics and Gynecology, 99 (2), pp. 275-280. , DOI 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01726-4, PII S0029784401017264
dc.descriptionHarper, C.C., Blum, M., De Bocanegra, H.T., Challenges in translating evidence to practice: The provision of intrauterine contraception (2008) Obstet. Gynecol, 111 (6), pp. 1359-1369
dc.descriptionBlack, K.I., Sakhaei, T., Garland, S.M., A study investigating obstetricians' and gynaecologists' management of women requesting an intrauterine device (2010) Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol, 50 (2), pp. 184-188
dc.descriptionMadden, T., Allsworth, J.E., Hladky, K.J., Secura, G.M., Peipert, J.F., Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: A survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes (2010) Contraception, 81 (2), pp. 112-116
dc.descriptionFarmer, M., Webb, A., Intrauterine device insertion-related complications: Can they be predicted? (2003) Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 29 (4), pp. 227-231. , DOI 10.1783/147118903101197854
dc.descriptionSuhonen, S., Haukkamaa, M., Jakobsson, T., Rauramo, I., Clinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: A comparative study (2004) Contraception, 69 (5), pp. 407-412. , DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2003.11.008, PII S0010782403003044
dc.descriptionZhou, L., Harrison-Woolrych, M., Coulter, D.M., Use of the New Zealand intensive medicines monitoring programme to study the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (Mirena) (2003) Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 12 (5), pp. 371-377. , DOI 10.1002/pds.875
dc.descriptionSivin, I., El Mahgoub, S., McCarthy, T., Mishell Jr., D.R., Shoupe, D., Alvarez, F., Brache, V., Stern, J., Long-term contraception with the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNg 20) and the Copper T 380Ag intrauterine devices: A five-year randomized study (1990) Contraception, 42 (4), pp. 361-378. , DOI 10.1016/0010-7824(90)90046-X
dc.descriptionMarions, L., Lövkvist, L., Taube, A., Johansson, M., Dalvik, H., Øverlie, I., Use of the levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system in nulliparous women-a non-interventional study in Sweden Eur (2011) J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care, 16 (2), pp. 126-134
dc.descriptionBahamondes, M.V., Hidalgo, M.M., Bahamondes, L., Monteiro, I., Ease of insertion and clinical performance of the levonorgestrel- releasing intrauterine system in nulligravidas (2011) Contraception, 84 (5), pp. e11-e16
dc.descriptionAllen, R.H., Bartz, D., Grimes, D.A., Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion (2009) Cochrane Database Syst. Rev, 3, pp. CD007373
dc.descriptionHubacher, D., Reyes, V., Lillo, S., Zepeda, A., Chen, P.-L., Croxatto, H., Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: Randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen (2006) American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 195 (5), pp. 1272-1277. , DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.022, PII S0002937806010714
dc.descriptionLassner, K.J., Chen, C.H., Kropsch, L.A., Oberle, M.W., Lopes, I.M., Morris, L., Comparative study of safety and efficacy of IUD insertions by physicians and nursing personnel in Brazil (1995) Bull. Pan. Am. Health Organ, 29 (3), pp. 206-215
dc.descriptionBrockmeyer, A., Kishen, M., Webb, A., Experience of IUD/IUS insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women-a pilot study (2008) Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care, 13 (3), pp. 248-254
dc.descriptionHeikinheimo, O., Inki, P., Kunz, M., Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study on the effect of misoprostol on ease of consecutive insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (2010) Contraception, 81 (6), pp. 481-486
dc.descriptionHubacher, D., Copper intrauterine device use by nulliparous women: Review of side effects (2007) Contraception, 75 (6 SUPPL.), pp. S8-S11. , DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.005, PII S0010782407000066
dc.descriptionSivin, I., Stern, J., Long-acting, more effective copper T IUDs: A summary of U.S. experience, 1970-75 (1979) Studies in Family Planning, 9 (10), pp. 263-281
dc.descriptionMishell Jr., D.R., Israel, R., Freid, N., A study of the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device (TCu 200) in nulliparous women (1973) Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 116 (8), pp. 1092-1096
dc.descriptionVeldhuis, H.M., Vos, A.G., Lagro-Janssen, A.L.M., Complications of the intrauterine device in nulliparous and parous women (2004) European Journal of General Practice, 10 (3), pp. 82-87
dc.descriptionJohnson, B.A., Insertion and removal of intrauterine devices (2005) American Family Physician, 71 (1), pp. 95-102
dc.descriptionPetersen, K.R., Brooks, L., Jacobsen, N., Skoby, S.O., Clinical performance of intrauterine devices in nulligravidae: Is the length of the endometrial cavity of significance? (1991) Acta Europaea Fertilitatis, 22 (4), pp. 225-228
dc.descriptionCanteiro, R., Bahamondes, M.V., Dos Santos Fernandes, A., Espejo-Arce, X., Marchi, N.M., Bahamondes, L., Length of the endometrial cavity as measured by uterine sounding and ultrasonography in women of different parities (2010) Contraception, 81 (6), pp. 515-519
dc.descriptionDuenas Diez, J.L., Albert, A., Carrasco, F., Intrauterine contraception in nulligravid vs parous women (1996) Contraception, 53 (1), pp. 23-24. , DOI 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00025-9
dc.descriptionBahamondes, M.V., Monteiro, I., Canteiro, R., Fernandes Ados, S., Bahamondes, L., Length of the endometrial cavity and intrauterine contraceptive device expulsion (2011) Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet, 113 (1), pp. 50-53
dc.descriptionMeirik, O., Rowe, P.J., Peregoudov, A., Piaggio, G., Petzold, M., The frameless copper-IUD (GyneFix) and the TCu380A IUD: Results of an 8-year multicenter randomized comparative trial (2009) Contraception, 80 (2), pp. 133-141. , IUD Research Group at the UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction
dc.descriptionBahamondes, L., Díaz, J., Marchi, N.M., Petta, C.A., Cristofoletti, M.L., Gomez, G., Performance of copper intrauterine devices when inserted after an expulsion (1995) Hum. Reprod, 10 (11), pp. 2917-2918
dc.descriptionMerki-Feld, G.S., Schwarz, D., Imthurn, B., Keller, P.J., Partial and complete expulsion of the Multiload 375 IUD and the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD after correct insertion (2008) European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 137 (1), pp. 92-96. , DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.02.003, PII S0301211507000796
dc.descriptionSivin, I., Stern, J., Coutinho, E., Prolonged intrauterine contraception: A seven year randomized study of the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNg 20) and the copper T380 Ag IUDs (1991) Contraception, 44 (5), pp. 473-480
dc.descriptionMarchi, N.M., Castro, S., Hidalgo, M.M., Management of missing strings in users of intrauterine contraceptives (2012) Contraception, 86 (4), pp. 354-358
dc.descriptionBlanas, K., Theodora, M., Hassanaien, M., Incidental discovery of two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems misplaced in the peritoneal cavity (2010) Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care, 15 (6), pp. 441-444
dc.descriptionAshton, J., Coulter, D., Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: Is the incidence higher than previously reported? (2003) Contraception, 67 (1), pp. 53-56. , DOI 10.1016/S0010-7824(02)00417-1, PII S0010782402004171
dc.descriptionChi, I.-C., What we have learned from recent IUD studies: A researcher's perspective (1993) Contraception, 48 (2), pp. 81-108. , DOI 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90001-N
dc.descriptionVan Houdenhoven, K., Van Kaam, K.J.A.F., Van Grootheest, A.C., Salemans, T.H.B., Dunselman, G.A.J., Uterine perforation in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (2006) Contraception, 73 (3), pp. 257-260. , DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.08.013, PII S0010782405003215
dc.descriptionTatum, H.J., Schmidt, F.H., Phillips, D., McCarty, M., O'Leary, W.M., The Dalkon Shield controversy Structural and bacteriological studies of IUD tails (1975) JAMA, 231 (7), pp. 711-717
dc.descriptionBurkman, R.T., Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: Evolving perspectives on the data (1996) Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 51 (12 SUPPL.), pp. S35-S41
dc.descriptionGrimes, D.A., The intrauterine device, pelvic inflammatory disease, and infertility: The confusion between hypothesis and knowledge (1992) Fertil. Steril, 58 (4), pp. 670-673
dc.descriptionPrager, S., Darney, P.D., The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in nulliparous women (2007) Contraception, 75 (6 SUPPL.), pp. S12-S15. , DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.01.018, PII S0010782407000789
dc.descriptionFarley, T.M., Rosenberg, M.J., Rowe, P.J., Chen, J.H., Meirik, O., Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: An international perspective (1992) Lancet, 339 (8796), pp. 785-788
dc.descriptionRivera, R., Yacobson, Y., Grimes, D., The mechanism of action of hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devices (1999) Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 181 (5 PART 1), pp. 1263-1269
dc.descriptionLee, N.C., Rubin, G.L., Ory, H.W., Burkman, R.T., Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease (1983) Obstetrics and Gynecology, 62 (1), pp. 1-6
dc.descriptionLee, N.C., Rubin, G.L., Ory, H.W., Burkman, R.T., Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease (1983) Obstetrics and Gynecology, 62 (1), pp. 1-6
dc.descriptionToivonen, J., Luukkainen, T., Allonen, H., Protective effect of intrauterine release of levonorgestrel on pelvic infection: 3 years' comparative experience of levonorgestrel-and copper-releasing intrauterine devices (1991) Obstet. Gynecol, 77 (2), pp. 261-264
dc.descriptionCampbell, S.J., Cropsey, K.L., Matthews, C.A., Intrauterine device use in a high-risk population: Experience from an urban university clinic (2007) Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 197 (2), pp. 193e1-193e6
dc.descriptionAlton, T.M., Brock, G.N., Yang, D., Wilking, D.A., Hertweck, S.P., Loveless, M.B., Retrospective review of intrauterine device in adolescent and young women (2012) J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol, 25 (3), pp. 195-200
dc.descriptionRandic, L., Vlasic, S., Matrljan, I., Waszak, C.S., Return to fertility after IUD removal for planned pregnancy (1985) Contraception, 32 (3), pp. 253-259. , DOI 10.1016/0010-7824(85)90048-4
dc.descriptionDoll, H., Vessey, M., Painter, R., Return of fertility in nulliparous women after discontinuation of the intrauterine device: Comparison with women discontinuing other methods of contraception (2001) British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 108 (3), pp. 304-314. , DOI 10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00075-9, PII S0306545600000759
dc.descriptionHubacher, D., Lara-Ricalde, R., Taylor, D.J., Guerra-Infante, F., Guzman-Rodriguez, R., Use of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid women (2001) New England Journal of Medicine, 345 (8), pp. 561-567. , DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa010438
dc.descriptionBahamondes, L., Bueno, J.G.R., Hardy, E., Vera, S., Pimentel, E., Ramos, M., Identification of main risk factors for tubal infertility (1994) Fertility and Sterility, 61 (3), pp. 478-482
dc.descriptionAndersson, K., Batar, I., Rybo, G., Return to fertility after removal of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and nova-T (1992) Contraception, 46 (6), pp. 575-584. , DOI 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90122-A
dc.descriptionAbma, J.C., Martinez, G.M., Copen, C.E., Teenagers in the United States: Sexual activity contraceptive use and childbearing national survey of family growth 2006-2008 (2010) Vital Health Stat, 23 (30), p. 1
dc.description(2012) American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Adolescents and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices, , ACOG Committee Opinion No. 539 October 2012. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Washinton DC, USA
dc.descriptionDiaz, J., Pinto Neto, A.M., Bahamondes, L., Diaz, M., Arce, X.E., Castro, S., Performance of the copper T 200 in parous adolescents: Are copper IUDs suitable for these women? (1993) Contraception, 48 (1), pp. 23-28. , DOI 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90062-C
dc.descriptionRoy, S., Cooper, D., Mishell Jr., D.R., Experience with three different models of the Copper T intrauterine contraceptive device in nulliparous women (1974) Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, 119 (3), pp. 414-417
dc.descriptionPaterson, H., Ashton, J., Harrison-Woolrych, M., A nationwide cohort study of the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device in New Zealand adolescents (2009) Contraception, 79 (6), pp. 433-438
dc.descriptionBayer, L.L., Jensen, J.T., Li, H., Nichols, M.D., Bednarek, P.H., Adolescent experience with intrauterine device insertion and use: A retrospective cohort study (2012) Contraception, 86 (5), pp. 443-451
dc.descriptionBeining, R.M., Dennis, L.K., Smith, E.M., Dokras, A., Meta-analysis of intrauterine device use and risk of endometrial cancer (2008) Ann. Epidemiol, 18 (6), pp. 492-499
dc.descriptionCastellsague, X., Thompson, W.D., Dubrow, R., Intra-uterine contraception and the risk of endometrial cancer (1993) International Journal of Cancer, 54 (6), pp. 911-916
dc.descriptionCurtis, K.M., Marchbanks, P.A., Peterson, H.B., Neoplasia with use of intrauterine devices (2007) Contraception, 75 (6 SUPPL.), pp. S60-S69. , DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.01.002, PII S0010782407000315
dc.descriptionHubacher, D., Grimes, D.A., Noncontraceptive health benefits of intrauterine devices: A systematic review (2002) Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 57 (2), pp. 120-128. , DOI 10.1097/00006254-200202000-00024
dc.descriptionLeslie, K.K., Thiel, K.W., Yang, S., Endometrial cancer: Potential treatment and prevention with progestin-containing intrauterine devices (2012) Obstet. Gynecol, 119 (2 PART 2), pp. 419-420
dc.descriptionCastellsagué, X., Díaz, M., Vaccarella, S., Intrauterine device use, cervical infection with human papillomavirus, and risk of cervical cancer: A pooled analysis of 26 epidemiological studies (2011) Lancet Oncol, 12 (11), pp. 1023-1031
dc.descriptionKaunitz, A.M., Bissonnette, F., Monteiro, I., Lukkari-Lax, E., Muysers, C., Jensen, J.T., Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or medroxyprogesterone for heavy menstrual bleeding: A randomized controlled trial (2010) Obstet. Gynecol, 116 (3), pp. 625-632. , erratum in: Obstet. Gynecol. 116(4) 999 2010
dc.descriptionFraser, I.S., Non-contraceptive health benefits of intrauterine hormonal systems (2010) Contraception, 82 (5), pp. 396-403
dc.descriptionLahteenmaki, P., Haukkamaa, M., Puolakka, J., Riikonen, U., Sainio, S., Suvisaari, J., Nilsson, C.G., Open randomised study of use of levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system as alternative to hysterectomy (1998) British Medical Journal, 316 (7138), pp. 1122-1126
dc.descriptionHurskainen, R., Teperi, J., Rissanen, P., Aalto, A.-M., Grenman, S., Kivela, A., Kujansuu, E., Paavonen, J., Clinical Outcomes and Costs with the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System or Hysterectomy for Treatment of Menorrhagia: Randomized Trial 5-Year Follow-up (2004) Journal of the American Medical Association, 291 (12), pp. 1456-1463. , DOI 10.1001/jama.291.12.1456
dc.descriptionRodeghiero, F., Castaman, G., Dini, E., Epidemiological investigations of the prevalence of von Willebrand's disease (1987) Blood, 69 (2), pp. 454-459
dc.descriptionKingman, C.E.C., Kadir, R.A., Lee, C.A., Economides, D.L., The use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treatment of menorrhagia in women with inherited bleeding disorders (2004) BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111 (12), pp. 1425-1428. , DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00305.x
dc.descriptionFedele, L., Berlanda, N., Emerging drugs for endometriosis (2004) Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs, 9 (1), pp. 167-177. , DOI 10.1517/14728214.9.1.167
dc.descriptionFedele, L., Bianchi, S., Zanconato, G., Portuese, A., Raffaelli, R., Use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis (2001) Fertility and Sterility, 75 (3), pp. 485-488. , DOI 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01759-3, PII S0015028200017593
dc.descriptionPetta, C.A., Ferriani, R.A., Abrao, M.S., Hassan, D., Rosa E Silva, J.C., Podgaec, S., Bahamondes, L., Randomized clinical trial of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and a depot GnRH analogue for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis (2005) Human Reproduction, 20 (7), pp. 1993-1998. , DOI 10.1093/humrep/deh869
dc.descriptionLockhat, F.B., Emembolu, J.O., Konje, J.C., The evaluation of the effectiveness of an intrauterine-administered progestogen (levonogestrel) in the symptomatic treatment of endometriosis and in the staging of the disease (2004) Human Reproduction, 19 (1), pp. 179-184. , DOI 10.1093/humrep/deh004
dc.descriptionAvgerinos, D.V., Llaguna, O.H., Seigerman, M., Lefkowitz, A.J., Leitman, I.M., Incidence and risk factors for the development of anemia following gastric bypass surgery (2010) World J. Gastroenterol, 16 (15), pp. 1867-1870
dc.descriptionVillar, J., Valladares, E., Wojdyla, D., Zavaleta, N., Carroli, G., Velazco, A., Shah, A., Acosta, A., Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: The 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America (2006) Lancet, 367 (9525), pp. 1819-1829. , DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68704-7, PII S0140673606687047
dc.descriptionGemzell-Danielsson, K., Schellschmidt, I., Apter, D., A randomized, Phase II study describing the efficacy, bleeding profile, and safety of two low-dose levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive systems and Mirena (2012) Fertil. Steril, 97 (3), pp. 616-622. , e1-e3
dc.languageen
dc.publisher
dc.relationClinical Practice
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleConsidering The Risks And Benefits Of Intrauterine Devices: Should Clinician Advice Now Be Changed?
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución