dc.creatorRobinson P.A.
dc.creatorMacnaghten P.
dc.creatorBanks S.
dc.creatorBickersteth J.
dc.creatorKennedy A.
dc.creatorRichardson Y.
dc.creatorShaw S.
dc.creatorSylvestre I.
dc.date2014
dc.date2015-06-25T18:06:12Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:07:01Z
dc.date2015-06-25T18:06:12Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:07:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:17:26Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:17:26Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierGeographical Journal. , v. 180, n. 1, p. 83 - 88, 2014.
dc.identifier167398
dc.identifier10.1111/geoj.12042
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84892989985&partnerID=40&md5=58df9167c149442c33c99e0c802202c1
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/88216
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/88216
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84892989985
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1257358
dc.descriptionUncertainties over emerging technologies and their potential effect on society and the environment often lead to controversy between scientists, policymakers and the public. Opening up the debates and involving citizens and social scientists early in the process of developing new technology is one way of responding to this issue of governance. By doing so, the hope is that the ethical implications and acceptability of new science can be more carefully considered and framed in a responsible and democratised context. To explore an example of aspiration in practice, a series of interdisciplinary public engagement events was organised at Durham University under the title New Storylines for Living with Environmental Change: Citizens' Perspectives. In this commentary we report on one of these events, a one-day workshop entitled Responsible Science and Public Engagement, where a citizens' panel aimed to explore ways of conducting deliberative engagement with scientists using the creative arts and a scientific dilemmas café format. © 2013 Royal Geographical Society.
dc.description180
dc.description1
dc.description83
dc.description88
dc.descriptionAnderson, D.G., (2000) Identity and ecology in arctic Siberia: The number one reindeer brigade, , Oxford University Press, Oxford
dc.descriptionBrace, C., Geoghegan, H., Human geographies of climate change: landscape, temporality, and lay knowledges (2010) Progress in Human Geography, 35, pp. 284-302
dc.descriptionBucchi, M., Neresini, F., Science and public participation (2008) The handbook of science and technology studies, pp. 449-472. , Hackett E J, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M and Wajcman J eds MIT Press, Cambridge MA and London -
dc.descriptionCallon, M., An essay on framing and overflowing (1998) The laws of the markets, pp. 244-269. , Callon M ed Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review, Oxford and Malden
dc.descriptionCallon, M., The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge (1999) Science, Technology and Society, 4, pp. 81-94
dc.descriptionCallon, M., Lascoumes, P., Barthe, Y., (2009), Acting in an uncertain world: an essay on technical democracy Burchell G trans MIT Press, Cambridge MACallon, M., Law, J., Rip, A., How to study the force of science (1986) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology, pp. 3-15. , Callon M, Law J and Rip A eds Macmillan Press, Basingstoke and London -
dc.description(2001) Social nature: theory, practice and politics, , Castree N and Braun B eds Blackwell, Oxford and Malden
dc.descriptionCrang, M., Qualitative methods: touchy, feely, look-see? (2003) Progress in Human Geography, 27, pp. 494-504
dc.descriptionDavies, G., Burgess, J., Eames, M., Mayer, S., Staley, K., Stirling, A., Williamson, S., (2003), www.deliberative-mapping.org/papers/dm-wellcome.pdf, Deliberative mapping: appraising options for addressing 'the Kidney Gap' Wellcome Trust final report Accessed 18 April 2013Davies, S.R., How we talk when we talk about nano: the future in laypeople's talk (2011) Futures, 43, pp. 317-326
dc.descriptionEngdahl, E., Lidskog, R., Risk, communication and trust: towards an emotional understanding of trust (2012) Public Understanding of Science, , doi: 10.1177/0963662512460953
dc.descriptionGabrys, J., Yusoff, K., Arts, sciences and climate change: practices and politics at the threshold (2012) Science as Culture, 21, pp. 1-24
dc.descriptionGeoghegan, H., Leyson, C., On climate change and cultural geography: farming on the Lizard Peninsula Cornwall, UK (2012) Climactic Change, 113, pp. 55-66
dc.descriptionHawkins, H., Geography and art. An expanding field: site, the body and practice (2012) Progress in Human Geography, 37, pp. 52-71
dc.descriptionHeidegger, M., (1962), Being and time Macquarrie J and Robinson E trans Basil Blackwell, OxfordHeidegger, M., (1971), Poetry, language, thought Hofstadter A trans Harper and Row, New YorkHilgartner, S., (2000) Science on stage: expert advice as public drama, , Stanford University Press, Stanford CA
dc.descriptionHoffmann-Reim, H., Wynne, B., In risk analysis one has to admit ignorance (2002) Nature, 416, p. 123
dc.description(2000) Science and society, , House of Lords The Stationery Office, London
dc.descriptionIngold, T., (2000) The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill, , Routledge, London and New York
dc.descriptionIrwin, A., The politics of talk: coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance (2006) Social Studies of Science, 36, pp. 299-320
dc.descriptionIrwin, A., Wynne, B., (2003) Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology, , University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge
dc.descriptionIrwin, A., Elgaard Jensen, T., Jones, K.E., The good, the bad and the perfect: criticizing engagement practice (2012) Social Studies of Science, 43, pp. 118-135
dc.descriptionJoss, S., Public participation in science and technology policy- and decision-making - ephemeral phenomenon or lasting change? (1999) Science and Public Policy, 26, pp. 290-293
dc.descriptionKearnes, M., Grove-White, R., Macnaghten, P., Wilsdon, J., Wynne, B., From bio to nano: learning lessons from the UK agricultural biotechnology controversy (2006) Science as Culture, 15, pp. 291-307
dc.descriptionKearnes, M., Macnaghten, P., Wilsdon, J., (2006) Governing at the nano-scale: people, policies and emerging technologies, , www.demos.co.uk/files/governingatthenanoscale.pdf, Demos, London Accessed 18 April 2013
dc.descriptionLane, S.N., Odoni, N., Landström, C., Whatmore, S.J., Ward, N., Bradley, S., Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method (2011) Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, pp. 15-36
dc.descriptionLast, A., Experimental geographies (2012) Geography Compass, 6, pp. 706-724
dc.descriptionLast, A., Mutable matter - exploring nanotechnological futures through sensory methods (2012) Leonardo, 45, pp. 132-139
dc.descriptionLatour, B., (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy, , Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA and London
dc.descriptionLatour, B., Weibel, P., (2005) Making things public: atmospheres of democracy, , MIT Press, Cambridge MA
dc.descriptionLeach, M., Scoones, I., Wynne, B., Introduction: science, citizenship and globalization (2005) Science and citizens: globalization and the challenge of engagement, pp. 3-14. , Leach M, Scoones I and Wynne B eds Zed Books, London and New York -
dc.descriptionMacnaghten, P., Chilvers, J., Governing risky technologies (2012) Critical risk research: practices, politics and ethics, pp. 99-124. , Kearnes M B, Klauser F R and Lane S N eds Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester -
dc.descriptionMacnaghten, P., Guivant, J.S., Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom (2011) Public Understanding of Science, 20, pp. 207-220
dc.descriptionMacnaghten, P.M., Kearnes, M.B., Wynne, B., Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? (2005) Science Communication, 27, pp. 268-291
dc.descriptionMacnaghten, P., Szerszynski, B., Living the global social experiment: an analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance (2013) Global Environmental Change, 23, pp. 465-474
dc.descriptionMiles, M., Representing nature: art and climate change (2010) Cultural Geographies, 17, pp. 19-35
dc.description(1979) Technology on trial: public participation in decision-making related to science and technology, , OECD OECD, Paris
dc.descriptionPickering, A., (2010) The cybernetic brain: sketches of another future, , University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London
dc.descriptionPielke, R.A., (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics, , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
dc.description(1998) Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 21st Report: setting environmental standards, , RCEP HMSO, London
dc.descriptionRogers, A., Geographies of the performing arts: landscapes, places and cities (2012) Geography Compass, 6, pp. 60-75
dc.descriptionRose, G., (2012) Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials, , Sage, London
dc.description(2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties, , Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering The Royal Society, London
dc.descriptionSaunders, A., Moles, K., The spatial practice of public engagement: 'doing' geography in the South Wales valleys (2013) Social and Cultural Geography, 14, pp. 23-40
dc.descriptionSykes, K., Macnaghten, P., Responsible innovation - opening up dialog and debate (2013) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, pp. 85-107. , Owen R, Bessant J and Heintz M eds John Wiley and Sons, Chichester -
dc.descriptionTolia-Kelly, D.P., The geographies of cultural geography II: visual culture (2012) Progress in Human Geography, 36, pp. 135-142
dc.descriptionWhatmore, S.J., Mapping knowledge controversies: science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise (2009) Progress in Human Geography, 33, pp. 587-598
dc.descriptionWilsdon, J., Willis, R., (2004) See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream, , Demos, London
dc.descriptionWynne, B., Elephants in the rooms where publics encounter 'science'? A response to Darrin Durant, 'Accounting for expertise: Wynne and the autonomy of the lay public' (2008) Public Understanding of Science, 17, pp. 21-33
dc.descriptionvan Est, R., The broad challenge of public engagement in science: commentary on 'Constitutional moments in governing science and technology' (2011) Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, pp. 639-648
dc.descriptionYusoff, K., Biopolitical economies and the political aesthetics of climate change (2010) Theory, Culture and Society, 27, pp. 73-99
dc.descriptionYusoff, K., Gabrys, J., Climate change and the imagination Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (2011) Climate Change, 2, pp. 516-534
dc.languageen
dc.publisher
dc.relationGeographical Journal
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleResponsible Scientists And A Citizens' Panel: New Storylines For Creative Engagement Between Science And The Public
dc.typeNota


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución