Eliciting Requirements For Learning Design Tools A Semio-participatory Approach

dc.creatorArpetti A.
dc.creatorBaranauskas M.C.C.
dc.creatorLeo T.
dc.date2014
dc.date2015-06-25T18:03:13Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:05:37Z
dc.date2015-06-25T18:03:13Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:05:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:16:15Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:16:15Z
dc.identifier9783319111995
dc.identifierLecture Notes In Computer Science (including Subseries Lecture Notes In Artificial Intelligence And Lecture Notes In Bioinformatics). Springer Verlag, v. 8719 LNCS, n. , p. 1 - 14, 2014.
dc.identifier3029743
dc.identifier10.1007/978-3-319-11200-8_1
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84906343784&partnerID=40&md5=9d43f928991f78e11b08606545ad4d07
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/88002
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/88002
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84906343784
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1257083
dc.descriptionThe need to properly design educational intervention, representing explicitly what students and teachers are planned to do, has been acknowledged in literature. Thus, Learning Design (LD) tools, if made accessible and usable by teachers, can bring significant benefits potentially improving results of educational practices. Although effort has been made in developing systems to support the learning design process, literature has shown they have not yet reached a sufficient spread among teachers. This paper investigated the subject by conducting semio-participatory practices with a group of teachers at a distance, to understand the meaning they make to issues regarding learning design practices and representations, aiming at eliciting user requirements for a prospective LD tool. © 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
dc.description8719 LNCS
dc.description
dc.description1
dc.description14
dc.descriptionAgostinho, S., The use of a visual learning design representation to document and communicate teaching ideas (2006) Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ASCILTE Conference: Who's Learning? Whose Technology? Sidney, pp. 3-7
dc.descriptionArpetti, A., Baranauskas, M.C.C., Leo, T., Making Design Easy: A Usability Evaluation of Latest Generation Learning Design Tools, , http://www.editlib.org/p/112076, (retrieved In Herrington J. Couros A. Irvine V. (eds. World Conference on Educational Multimedia Hypermedia and Telecommunications (EDMEDIA) pp. 960-965. AACE Victoria (2013a
dc.descriptionArpetti, A., Baranauskas, M.C.C., Leo, T., Learning design and teaching practice: Outlining an iterative cycle for professional teachers 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 280-284. , IEEE (2013b doi:10.1109/ICALT.2013.87
dc.descriptionBaranauskas, M.C.C., Socially aware computing (2009) ICECE 2009 VI International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education, pp. 1-5
dc.descriptionBaranauskas, M.C.C., Schimiguel, J., Simoni, C., Bauzer Medeiros, C., Guiding the process of requirements elicitation with a semiotic-based approach (2005) 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 100-111. , Lawrence Erlbaum Las Vegas
dc.descriptionBeetham, H., An approach to learning activity design (2007) Rethinking Pedagogy for A Digital Age: Designing and Delivering E-learning, , In Beetham H. Sharpe R. (eds. Routledge London
dc.descriptionBeetham, H., Sharpe, R., (2013) Rethinking Pedagogy for A Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning, , Routledge New York
dc.descriptionBoy, G.A., The group elicitation method for participatory design and usability testing (1997) Interactions, pp. 27-33
dc.descriptionChu, S.K., Kennedy, D.M., Using online collaborative tools for groups to coconstruct knowledge (2011) Online Information Review, 35 (4), pp. 581-597
dc.descriptionhttp://compendium.open.ac.uk/institute/, Compendium Institute (2013 retrieved January 052014Conole, G., Tools and resources to guide practice (2008) Rethinking Pedagogy for A Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning, pp. 1-25
dc.descriptionConole, G., An overview of design representations (2010) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Networked Learning (NLC 2010) Aalborg Denmark, pp. 482-489
dc.descriptionConole, G., (2013) Designing for Learning in An Open World, , Springer Berlin
dc.descriptionConole, G., Weller, M., Using learning design as a framework for supporting the design and reuse of OER (2008) Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2008 (1), pp. 1-13
dc.descriptionDalziel, J.R., Lessons from LAMS for IMS learning design (2006) Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2006) Vol, 3, pp. 1101-1102
dc.descriptionDalziel, J.R., (2012) The Larnaca Declaration on Learning Design, , http://www.larnacadeclaration.org
dc.descriptionDerntl, M., Neumann, S., Oberhuemer, P., Propelling standards-based sharing and reuse in instructional modeling communities: The open graphical learning modeler (openglm (2011) 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 431-435. , IEEE
dc.descriptionDobozy, E., Typologies of Learning Design and the introduction of a "lD-Type 2" case example (2011) ELearning Papers, 27 (27), pp. 1-11
dc.descriptionEarp, J., Pozzi, F., Fostering reflection in ICT-based pedagogical planning (2006) Proceedings of the First International LAMS Conference, pp. 35-44
dc.descriptionFerrell, G., Transforming Curriculum Design: Transforming Institutions, pp. 1-4. , Briefing (February 2011
dc.descriptionGoodyear, P., Educational design and networked learning: Patterns pattern languages and design practice (2005) Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21 (1), pp. 1-12
dc.descriptionGoodyear, P., Ellis, R., Students interpretations of learning tasks: Implications for educational design (2007) Proceedings of the ASCILITE 2007 Conference, pp. 339-346
dc.descriptionGriffiths, D., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P., Advances in editors for ims ld in the tencompetence projec (2008) 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 1045-1047. , IEEE
dc.descriptionGutierrez, S., Valigiani, G., Jamont, Y., Collet, P., Kloos, C.D., A swarm approach for automatic auditing of pedagogical planning (2007) Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007, pp. 136-138. , IEEE
dc.descriptionHernández-Leo, D., Romeo, L., Carralero, M.A., Chacón, J., Carrió, M., Moreno, P., Blat, J., LdShake: Learning design solutions sharing and co-edition (2011) Computers & Education, 57 (4), pp. 2249-2260
dc.descriptionKatsamani, M., Retalis, S., Orchestrating learning activities using the CADMOS learning design tool (2013) Research in Learning Technologies Supplement, 21 (1-12)
dc.descriptionKatsamani, M., Retalis, S., Making learning designs in layers: The CADMOS approach (2011) Proceedings of the IADIS Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, pp. 305-312
dc.descriptionKoper, R., Olivier, B., Anderson, T., IMS learning design information model (2003) IMS Global Learning Consortium
dc.descriptionKoper, R., Current research in learning design (2006) Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1), pp. 13-22
dc.descriptionLiu, K., (2000) Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering, , Cambridge University Press Cambridge
dc.descriptionLockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., Harper, B., Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues (2009) Applications and Technologies, 2. , IGI Global Hershey
dc.descriptionMasterman, E., Craft, B., Designing and evaluating representations to model pedagogy (2013) Research in Learning Technologies Supplement, 21 (1-14)
dc.descriptionMcKenney, S., Reeves, T.C., (2012) Conducting Educational Design Research, p. 234. , Routledge New York
dc.descriptionNielsen, J., Mack, R.L., Bergendorff, K.H., Grischkowsky, N.L., Integrated software usage in the professional work environment: Evidence from questionnaires and interviews (1986) ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 17, pp. 162-167
dc.descriptionOliver, R., Littlejohn, A., Discovering and describing accessible and reusable practitionerfocused learning (2006) Proceedings of Theme of the JISC Online Conference: Innovating E-Learning, pp. 30-33
dc.descriptionPersico, D., Pozzi, F., Anastopoulou, S., Conole, G., Craft, B., Dimitriadis, H.D., Kali, Y., Walmsley, H., Learning design Rashomon i through different approaches (2013) Research in Learning Technologies Supplement, 21
dc.descriptionhttp://www.reload.ac.uk/, RELOAD Reusable eLEarning Object Authoring & Delivery (n.d. retrieved January 05 2014Stamper, R., Signs information norms and systems (1996) Signs at Work, pp. 349-397. , In Holmqvist B. et al. (eds. Walter de Gruyter Berlin
dc.descriptionWijnen, W., (2000) Towards Design-Based Learning, , Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology. University of Eindhoven NL: OGO brochure No2. Educational Service Center
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag
dc.relationLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleEliciting Requirements For Learning Design Tools A Semio-participatory Approach
dc.typeActas de congresos


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución