Artículos de revistas
Different Pronunciations In A Silent Language? A Study Of Variation In The Production Of Brazilian Sign Language Signs [diferentes Pronúncias Em Uma Língua Não Sonora? Um Estudo Da Variação Na Produção De Sinais Da Libras]
Registro en:
Delta Documentacao De Estudos Em Linguistica Teorica E Aplicada. Pontificia Universidade Catolica De Sao Paulo, v. 30, n. 2, p. 371 - 413, 2014.
1024450
10.1590/0102-445069770367936329
2-s2.0-84906513466
Autor
Xavier A.N.
Barbosa P.A.
Institución
Resumen
Research on American Sign Language (ASL) phonetics and phonology has shown that signs are made up of distinctive units (parameters) and that these units can exhibit variation in their concrete manifestation. Little is known about Brazilian Sign Language (Libras) distinctive units and their variation. This study represents a first step toward a better understanding of variation in Libras signs, drawing on the analysis of 60 signs as produced by 12 deaf subjects. The analysis of these productions, elicited through images combined with glosses in Portuguese, not only confirmed the occurrence of variation in the handshape, location, movement, orientation, non-manuals and number of hands across subjects, as observed in spontaneous signing, but also revealed variation in other articulatory aspects such as contact. In addition, this study documents variation within the same subject regarding all parameters analyzed. 30 2 371 413 Ann, J., A functional explanation of Taiwan Sign Language Handshape Frequency (2005) Language and Linguistics 6.2, pp. 217-246 Battison, R., Phonological Deletion in American Sign Language (1974) Sign Language Studies, 5, pp. 1-19 Ann, J., Markowicz, H., Woodward, J., A good rule of thumb: Variable phonology in American Sign Language (1975) Analyzing variation in language, pp. 291-302. , In.: FASOLD, Ralph W. SHUY, Roger W. (org.).Washing, D.C.: Georgetown University Press Brennan, M., The Visual World of BSL: An Introduction (1992) Dictionary of British Sign Language/English., pp. 1-133. , In.: BRIEN, David (org.) London: Faber and Faber Brentari, D., Padden, C., Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins (2001) Foreign Vocabulary in Sign Languages: A Cross-linguistic Investigation of Word Formation., pp. 87-119. , In.: BRENTARI, Diane. (org.).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Felipe De Souza, T.A., A relação sintático-semântica dos verbos e seus argumentos na língua brasileira de sinais (libras). (1998), Tese (Doutorado em linguística) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 1998Friedman, L.A., Phonological Processes in the American Sign Language (1975) Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 147-159 Frishberg, N., Arbitrariness and Iconicity: Historical Change in American Sign Language (1975), 51 (3), pp. 696-719. , LanguageHoopes, R., A preliminary examination of pinky extension: Suggestions regarding its occurrence, constraints, and function (1998) Pinky extension and eye gaze: Language use in Deaf communities,, pp. 3-17. , In.: LUCAS, Ceil. (org.). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press Israel, A., Sandler, W., Phonological Category Resolution: A Study of Handshapes in Younger and Older Sign Languages (2011) Formational Units in Sign Language, pp. 177-202. , In.: CHANNON, Rachel VAN DER HULST, Harry. (org.).Nijmegen: Ishara Johnson, R.E., Liddell, S.K., Toward a Phonetic Representation of Hand Configuration: The Fingers (2011) Sign Language Studies, 12 (1), pp. 5-45 Johnston, T., Schembri, A., Australian Sign Language (Auslan): An introduction to sign language linguistics. (2007), p. 296. , Cambridge: Cambridge University PressKlima, E., Bellugi, U., (1979) The Signs of Language, , Cambridge MA.: Harvard University Press Liddell, S.K., THINK and BELIEVE: sequentiality in American Sign Language. (1984) Language 60, 2, pp. 372-399 Liddell, S.K., Johnson, R.E., American Sign Language: The Phonological Base (1989) Sign Language Studies, 64, pp. 197-277 Lucas, C., Et Al., Sociolinguistic variation in American Sign Language. (2001), Washington, DC: Gallaudet University PressPadden, C., Perlmutter, D., American Sign Language and the Architecture of Phonological Theory (1987) Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5 (3), pp. 335-375 Sandler, W., Symbiotic symbolization by hand and mouth in sign language (2009) Semiotica, 174 (1-4), pp. 241-275 Stokoe, W., Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf (1960) Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers, 8. , Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press Woodward, J.C., Et Al., Facing and handling variation in American Sign Language phonology (1976) Sign Language Studies, 10, pp. 43-51 Woodward, J.C., Desantis, S., Two to One It Happens: Dynamic Phonology in Two Sign Languages (1977) Sign Language Studies, 17, pp. 329-346 Xavier, A.N., Descrição fonético-fonológica dos sinais da língua brasileira de sinais (libras). (2006), 175 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística). Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2006Xavier, A.N., Variação fonológica na libras: um estudo da alternância no número de articuladores manuais envolvidos na produção dos sinais (2011), 5, pp. 119-145. , In: XVI SETA - Seminários de Teses em Andamento, 2011, Campinas. Anais do SETA (UNICAMP)Xavier, A.N., Doubling of the number of hands as a resource for the expression of meaning intensification in Brazilian Sign Language (Libras) (2013) Journal of Speech Sciences, 1, pp. 169-181 Xavier, A.N., Uma ou duas? Eis a questão! Um estudo do parâmetro número de mãos na produção de sinais da língua brasileira de sinais (libras) (2014), 158 f. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística). Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 2014Xavier, A.N., Barbosa, P.A., A preliminary study on the production of signs in Brazilian Sign Language when one of the manual articulators is unavailable (2011) Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech), pp. 645-648