dc.creatorRamirez J.
dc.creatorFruett F.
dc.date2014
dc.date2015-06-25T18:00:06Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:01:26Z
dc.date2015-06-25T18:00:06Z
dc.date2015-11-26T15:01:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:12:29Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:12:29Z
dc.identifier9781479968350
dc.identifier2014 Ieee 9th Iberoamerican Congress On Sensors, Ibersensor 2014 - Conference Proceedings. Institute Of Electrical And Electronics Engineers Inc., v. , n. , p. - , 2014.
dc.identifier
dc.identifier10.1109/IBERSENSOR.2014.6995556
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84921683998&partnerID=40&md5=8af7d3214b49128b8220f2d216a5fb6c
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/87395
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/87395
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84921683998
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1256281
dc.descriptionThe present work analyzes a four-terminal Hall-plate device to determine the main sources of error and explain how current-spinning technique can be used to effectively reduce offset and noise. Based on this analysis, an improved magnetic sensor is designed using an eight terminal octagonal Hall plate and a chopped-based control circuit to implement the current-spinning technique. Since Hall plates are complete compatible with the CMOS manufacturing process, a monolithic chip which contains the sensor, switches, digital control and bias circuit were fabricated using a 0.6 μm commercial CMOS process. These devices are used to test the offset cancellation methodology and compare if there are advantages related to the device orientation or switching sequence. Experimental results show a residual offset of 0.25 mT, a 99% reduction compared with the original offset level measured at Hall plate.
dc.description
dc.description
dc.description
dc.description
dc.descriptionGridchin, A.V., The four-terminal silicon piezotransducer: History and future (2004) 5th Annual International Siberian Workshop and Tutorial on Electron Devices and Materials, pp. 21-23
dc.descriptionPopovic, R.S., (2010) Hall Effect Devices, Second Edition, , Series in Sensors. Taylor and Francis
dc.descriptionBilotti, A., Monreal, G., Vig, R., Monolithic magnetic hall sensor using dynamic quadrature offset cancellation (1997) IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 32, pp. 829-836
dc.descriptionMunter, P.J.A., A low offset spinning-current hall plate (1990) Sensors and Actuators, A21, pp. 743-746
dc.descriptionRamirez, J., Fruett, F., Octagonal geometry hall plate designed for the PiezoHall effect measurement (2013) 28th Symposium on Microelectronics Technology and Devices-SBMICRO
dc.descriptionCoraucci, G., Finardi, M., Fruett, F., A multi-terminal pressure sensor with enhanced sensitivity (2009) 5th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems-Transducers
dc.descriptionKanda, Y., Migitaka, M., Effect of mechanical stress on the offset voltage of hall devices in Si IC (1976) Phys. Status Solidi, 35, pp. 115-118
dc.descriptionMunter, P.J.A., Electronic circuitry for a smart spinningcurrent Hall plate with low offset (1991) Sensors and Actuators, A27
dc.descriptionUdo, A., Limits of offset cancellation by the principle of spinning current Hall probe (2004) Proceedings of IEEE, 24, pp. 1117-1120
dc.descriptionBellekom, S., Sarro, L., Offset reduction of Hall plates in three different crystal planes (1997) Solid State Sensors and Actuators, 1997. TRANSDUCERS '97 Chicago., 1997 International Conference on, 1, pp. 233-236. , Jun 1
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
dc.relation2014 IEEE 9th IberoAmerican Congress on Sensors, IBERSENSOR 2014 - Conference Proceedings
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleOffset Reduction In A Multiple-terminal Hall Plate Using Current Spinning
dc.typeActas de congresos


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución