Content Validity In The Development And Adaptation Processes Of Measurement Instruments [validade De Conteúdo Nos Processos De Construção E Adaptação De Instrumentos De Medidas]

dc.creatorAlexandre N.M.C.
dc.creatorColuci M.Z.O.
dc.date2011
dc.date2015-06-30T20:44:55Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:54:27Z
dc.date2015-06-30T20:44:55Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:54:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:06:26Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:06:26Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierCiencia E Saude Coletiva. , v. 16, n. 7, p. 3061 - 3068, 2011.
dc.identifier14138123
dc.identifier10.1590/S1413-81232011000800006
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79960985372&partnerID=40&md5=0696662a9f08eac91d96033e1203ceb0
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/109069
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/109069
dc.identifier2-s2.0-79960985372
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1255169
dc.descriptionThis study sought to conduct a review of content validity, which is an important phase of processes of construction and adaptation of measurement instruments. Research of comprehensive literature was conducted by means of a review of national and international databases. Initially, a description of the conceptual basis and the measurement methods used in content validity was made, with emphasis on its application in the healthcare area. It was seen that controversy exists in the literature on the terminology and concept of content validity. The recommended procedures used to check content validity during the construction and adaptation processes of instruments were described, especially the judges' assessment, which can involve qualitative and quantitative procedures. The number, selection and qualification of these judges were also described. The different methods used to quantify the level of agreement among the experts were verified, mainly the Content Validity Index (CVI). This study described aspects of the content validity process, one of the procedures to be considered by healthcare researchers and professionals who are interested in using reliable and appropriate measurements and instruments scales for given population groups.
dc.description16
dc.description7
dc.description3061
dc.description3068
dc.descriptionMarx, R.G., Bombardier, C., Hogg-Johnson, S., Wright, J.G., Clinimetric and psychometric strategies for development of a health measurement scale (1999) J Clin Epidemiol, 52 (2), pp. 105-111
dc.descriptionSelby-Harrington, M.L., Mehta, S.M., Jutsum, V., Riportella-Muller, R., Quade, D., Reporting of instrument validity and reliability in selected clinical nursing journals (1994) J Prof Nurs, 10 (1), pp. 47-56
dc.descriptionSalmond, S.S., Evaluating the reliability and validity of measurement instruments (2008) Orthop Nurs, 27 (1), pp. 28-30
dc.descriptionDempsey, P.A., Dempsey, A.D., (1996) Using nursing research, , 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott
dc.descriptionde Vet, H.C.W., Terwee, C.B., Bouter, L.M., Current challenges in clinimetrics (2003) J Clin Epidemiol, 56, pp. 1137-1141
dc.descriptionFayers, P.M., McHin, D., (2000) Quality of life. Assessment, analysis and interpretation, , Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons
dc.descriptionFitzner, K., Reliability and validity (2007) Diabetes Educ, 33 (5), pp. 775-780
dc.descriptionFrost, M.H., Reeve, B.B., Liepa, A.M., Stauffer, J.W., Hays, R.D., What is sufficient for reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? (2007) Value Health, 10 (SUPL. 2), pp. S94-S105
dc.descriptionEsperidião, M., Trad, L.A.B., Avaliação de satisfação de usuários (2005) Cien Saude Colet, 10 (SUPL.), pp. 303-312
dc.descriptionSireci, S.G., The construct of content validity (1998) Soc Indic Res, 45, pp. 83-117
dc.descriptionRoberts, P., Priest, H., Traynor, M., Reliability and validity in research (2006) Nurs Stand, 20 (44), pp. 41-45
dc.descriptionContandriopoulos, A.P., Champagne, F., Potvin, L., Denis, J.L., Boyle, P., (1999) Saber preparar uma pesquisa, , 3 a ed. São Paulo: Hucitec, Abrasco
dc.descriptionLoBiondo-Wood, G., Harber, J., (1998) Nursing Research: Methods, critical appraisal, e and utilization, , 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book
dc.descriptionBurns, N., Grove, S.K., (1997) The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique & utilization, , 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Company
dc.descriptionMendonça, K.M.P.P., Guerra, R.O., Desenvolvimento e validação de um instrumento de medida da satisfação do paciente com a fisioterapia (2007) Rev Bras Fisioter, 11 (5), pp. 369-376
dc.descriptionHabib, E.S., Magalhães, L.C., Criação de questionário para detecção de comportamentos atípicos em bebês (2007) Rev Bras Fisioter, 11 (3), pp. 177-183
dc.descriptionBeyea, S., Nicoll, L.H., Writing an integrative review (1998) AORN J, 67 (4), pp. 877-880
dc.descriptionWynd, C.A., Schmidt, B., Schaefer, M.A., Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity (2003) West J Nurs Res, 25 (5), pp. 508-518
dc.descriptionHaynes, S.N., Richard, D.C.S., Kubany, E.S., Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods (1995) Psychol Assess, 7 (3), pp. 238-247
dc.descriptionRubio, D.M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S.S., Lee, S., Rauch, S., Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research (2003) Soc Work Res, 27 (2), pp. 94-105
dc.descriptionPolit, D.F., Hungler, B.P., (1995) Fundamentos de pesquisa em enfermagem, , 3 a ed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas
dc.descriptionPolit, D.F., Beck, C.T., The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recomendationas (2006) Res Nurs Health, 29, pp. 489-497
dc.descriptionLynn, M.R., Determination and quantification of content validity (1986) Nurs Res, 35 (6), pp. 382-385
dc.descriptionPasquali, L., (2004) Psicometria, , 2 a ed. Petrópolis (RJ): Editora Vozes
dc.descriptionDeVon, H.A., Block, M.E., Moyle-Wright, P., Ernst, D.M., Hayden, S.J., Lazzara, D.J., Savoy, S.M., Kostas-Polston, E., A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability (2007) J Nurs Scholarsh, 39 (2), pp. 155-164
dc.descriptionCarmines, E.G., Zeller, R.A., (1988) Reliability and validity assessment, , 11th ed. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage
dc.descriptionGrant, J.S., Davis, L.L., Selection and use of content experts for instrument development (1997) Res Nurs Health, 20 (3), pp. 269-274
dc.descriptionBerk, R.A., Importance of expert judgment in content-related validity evidence (1990) West J Nurs Res, 12 (5), pp. 659-671
dc.descriptionKirshner, B., Guyatt, G., A methodological framework for assessing health indices (1985) J Chron Dis, 38 (1), pp. 27-36
dc.descriptionPasquali, L., Princípios de elaboração de escalas psicológicas (1998) Rev Psiquiatr Clin, 25 (5), pp. 206-213
dc.descriptionStreiner, D.L., Norman, G.R., (2002) Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use, , 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press
dc.descriptionHunt, S.M., Bucquet, D., Niero, M., Wiklund, I., McKenna, S., Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures (1991) Health Policy, 19 (44), pp. 33-44
dc.descriptionGuillemin, F., Bombardier, C., Beaton, D., Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines (1993) J Clin Epidemiol, 46 (12), pp. 1417-1432
dc.descriptionGuillemin, F., Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures (1995) Scand J Rheumatol, 24 (2), pp. 61-63
dc.descriptionHutchinson, A., Bentzen, N., Konig-Zanhn, C., (1996) Cross cultural health outcome assessment: A user's guide, , The Netherlands: ERGHO
dc.descriptionAlexandre, N.M.C., Guirardello, E.B., Adaptación cultural de instrumentos utilizados em salud ocupacional (2002) Rev Panam Salud Publica, 11 (2), pp. 109-111
dc.descriptionBeaton, D.E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., Ferraz, M.B., Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures (2000) Spine, 25 (24), pp. 3186-3191
dc.descriptionDavis, L.L., Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts (1992) Appl Nurs Res, 5 (4), pp. 194-197
dc.descriptionTilden, V.P., Nelson, C.A., May, B.A., Use of qualitative methods to enhance content validity (1990) Nurs Res, 39 (3), pp. 172-175
dc.descriptionHyrkäs, K., Appelqvist-Schmidlechner, K., Oksa, L., Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel (2003) Int J Nurs Stud, 40 (6), pp. 619-625
dc.descriptionMcGilton, K., Development and psychometric evaluation of supportive leadership scales (2003) Can J Nurs Res, 35 (4), pp. 72-86
dc.descriptionMorse, J.M., Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation (1991) Nurs Res, 40 (1), pp. 120-123
dc.descriptionHulley, S.B., Cummings, S.R., Browner, W.S., Grady, D., Hearst, N., Newman, T.B., (2003) Delineando a pesquisa clínica, , 2 a ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed
dc.descriptionTopf, M., Three estimates of interrater reliability for nominal data (1986) Nurs Res, 35 (4). , 253-245
dc.descriptionWynd, C.A., Schaefer, M.A., The Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Tool: Establishing content validity through a panel of experts (2002) Appl Nurs Res, 16 (2), pp. 184-188
dc.descriptionSiegel, S., Castellan, H.J., (2006) Estatística não paramétrica para ciências do comportamento, , 2 a ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed
dc.languageen
dc.languagept
dc.publisher
dc.relationCiencia e Saude Coletiva
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleContent Validity In The Development And Adaptation Processes Of Measurement Instruments [validade De Conteúdo Nos Processos De Construção E Adaptação De Instrumentos De Medidas]
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución