dc.creatorda Silva E.J.N.L.
dc.creatorHerrera D.R.
dc.creatorSantos C.C.O.
dc.creatorGomes B.P.F.A.
dc.creatorZaia A.A.
dc.date2011
dc.date2015-06-30T20:24:30Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:49:09Z
dc.date2015-06-30T20:24:30Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:49:09Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T22:00:03Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T22:00:03Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierDental Press Endodontics. Dental Press Editora Ltda, v. 1, n. 3, p. 41 - 44, 2011.
dc.identifier21783713
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84922688273&partnerID=40&md5=6e626c10805be288616b8f73b3423983
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/107830
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/107830
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84922688273
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1253808
dc.descriptionObjective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Root ZX II electronic apex locator (EAL) using hand stainless-steel file, nickel-titanium hand file and nickel-titanium rotary file. Methods: Twenty straight single-rooted maxillary central teeth were used. The actual working length (AWL) was measured by inserting a #15 K-file until the file tip was visible at 4x magnification. The file was removed from the canal and its length was measured using a digital caliper. For the electronic measurements, samples were fixed in glass recipients with plastic cover, containing 0.9% saline solution. The measurements were carried out using the Root ZX II and they were performed using a #15 K-file, NiTi hand file and a rotary Mtwo file. The files were attached to the EAL and during their insertion into the root canal the measurements were monitored until the display indicated "zero". The corresponding values of the difference between the AWL and the electronic measurement were recorded and submitted to ANOVA and Tukey test (α=0.05). Results: No statistically significant differences (p<0.05) was found among the tested files. Conclusion: It can be concluded that both stainless steel files and NiTi hand or rotary files are adequate to determine the working length using the Root ZX II.
dc.description1
dc.description3
dc.description41
dc.description44
dc.descriptionBeltrame, A.P., Triches, T.C., Sartori, N., Bolan, M., Electronic determination of root canal working length in primary molar teeth: an in vivo and ex vivo study (2011) Int Endod J., 44 (5), pp. 402-406
dc.description(2003), 7th ed. Chicago: American Association of EndodontistsRicucci, D., Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 1 (1998) Literature review. Int Endod J., 31 (6), pp. 384-393
dc.descriptionStoll, R., Betke, K., Stachniss, V., The influence of different factors on the survival of root canal fillings: a 10-year retrospective study (2005) J Endod., 31 (11), pp. 783-790
dc.descriptionKobayashi, C., Electronic canal root measurement (1995) Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol., 79, pp. 226-231
dc.descriptionStöber, E.K., Duran-Sindreu, F., Mercadé, M., Vera, J., Bueno, R., Roig, M., An evaluation of Root ZX and iPex apex locators: an in vivo study (2011) J Endod., 37 (5), pp. 608-610. , Epub 2011 Mar 22
dc.descriptionWilliams, C.B., Joyce, A.P., Roberts, S., A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction (2006) J Endod., 32 (7), pp. 624-627
dc.descriptionKatz, A., Tamse, A., Kaufman, A.Y., Tooth length determination: a review (1991) Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol., 72 (2), pp. 238-242
dc.descriptionSimon, J.H., The apex: how critical is it? (1994) Gen Dent., 42 (4), pp. 330-334
dc.descriptionVaudt, J., Bitter, K., Neumann, K., Kielbassa, A.M., Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments (2009) Int Endod J., 42 (1), pp. 22-33
dc.descriptionWalia, H.M., Brantley, W.A., Gerstein, H., An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files (1988) J Endod., 14 (7), pp. 346-351
dc.descriptionGuise, G.M., Goodell, G.G., Imamura, G.M., In vitro comparison of three electronic apex locators (2010) J Endod., 36 (2), pp. 279-281. , Epub 2009 Nov 10
dc.descriptionBriseño-Marroquín, B., Frajlich, S., Goldberg, F., Willershausen, B., Influence of instrument size on the accuracy of different apex locators: an in vitro study (2008) J Endod., 34 (6), pp. 698-702. , Epub 2008 Apr 11
dc.descriptionJenkins, J.A., Walker, W.A., III, Schindler, W.G., Flores, C.M., An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of the Root ZX in the presence of various irrigants (2001) J Endod., 27 (3), pp. 209-211
dc.descriptionSadeghi, S., Abolghasemi, M., The accuracy of the Raypex5 electronic apex locator using stainless-steel hand K-file versus nickel-titanium rotary Mtwo file (2010) Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal., 15 (5), pp. e788-e790
dc.descriptionSiu, C., Marshall, J.G., Baumgartner, J.C., An in vivo comparison of the Root ZX II, the Apex NRG XFR, and Mini Apex Locator by using rotary nickel-titanium files (2009) J Endod., 35 (7), pp. 962-965
dc.descriptionAzabal, M., Garcia-Otero, D., de la Macorra, J.C., Accuracy of the Justy II Apex locator in determining working length in simulated horizontal and vertical fractures (2004) Int Endod J., 37, pp. 174-177
dc.descriptionSilva, EJNL., Portella, I.R., Brito, P.R.R., Magalhães, K.M., Coutinho-Filho, T.S., Avaliação in vitro da eficiência de um localizador apical eletrônico em dentes com reabsorções radiculares simuladas (2011) Dental Press Endod., 1 (2), pp. 52-56
dc.languageen
dc.publisherDental Press Editora Ltda
dc.relationDental Press Endodontics
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleAccuracy Of The Root Zx Ii Using Stainless-steel And Nickel-titanium Files
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución