Comparison Of Local Signs And Symptoms After The Insertion Of Norplant® Implants With And Without A Scalpel

dc.creatorDiaz J.
dc.creatorRubin J.
dc.creatorFaundes A.
dc.creatorDiaz M.
dc.creatorBahamondes L.
dc.date1991
dc.date2015-06-30T14:09:35Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:41:49Z
dc.date2015-06-30T14:09:35Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:41:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:49:02Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:49:02Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierContraception. , v. 44, n. 3, p. 217 - 221, 1991.
dc.identifier107824
dc.identifier10.1016/0010-7824(91)90013-6
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0025948928&partnerID=40&md5=43defeb8d56cfe4276d51b149718210d
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/99210
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/99210
dc.identifier2-s2.0-0025948928
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1251013
dc.descriptionThe study compares NORPLANT® subdermal implants acceptors enrolled randomly for two different insertion procedures. One group (420 women) received the implants with the use of a scalpel according to the manufacturer's instructions. The other group (423 women) received the implant without an incision, directly through a sharpened trocar. The local signs and symptoms were observed at 7 and 30 days after insertion. Pain, tenderness, edema/ swelling, ecchymosis and defective scar were considered. Complication rates were low and no significant differences were found between the two procedures. Based on the data of this study, we recommend inserting NORPLANT® implants without the use of a scalpel. © 1991.
dc.description44
dc.description3
dc.description217
dc.description221
dc.descriptionThe Population Council NORPLANT®levonorgestrel implants, (1990) A Summary of Scientific Data, , New York
dc.descriptionThe Population Council, (1990) Manual for Clinicians, , New York
dc.descriptionWHO, Facts about an implantable contraceptive: memorandum from a WHO meeting (1985) Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 63, p. 485
dc.descriptionDíaz, Croxatto, Pavez, Miranda, Quinteros, Regulatión de la fertilidad por medio de implantes subcutáneos de progestágenos (1980) Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecología, 45, p. 316
dc.descriptionSivin, International experience with NORPLANT® and NORPLANT®-2 contraceptives (1988) Studies in Family Planning, 19, p. 81
dc.descriptionKlavon, Grubb, Insertion site complications during the first year of NORPLANT® use (1990) Contraception, 41, p. 27
dc.descriptionHardy, Coutinho, Goodson, Study of the NORPLANT® user's reactions to its characteristics and symptoms during its use (1987) Report presented to the Population Council
dc.languageen
dc.publisher
dc.relationContraception
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleComparison Of Local Signs And Symptoms After The Insertion Of Norplant® Implants With And Without A Scalpel
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución