Histologic Grading Of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Intraobserver Reproducibility Of The Mostofi, Gleason And Böcking Grading Systems

dc.creatorCintra M.L.
dc.creatorBillis A.
dc.date1991
dc.date2015-06-30T14:09:22Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:41:43Z
dc.date2015-06-30T14:09:22Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:41:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:48:52Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:48:52Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierInternational Urology And Nephrology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, v. 23, n. 5, p. 449 - 454, 1991.
dc.identifier3011623
dc.identifier10.1007/BF02583988
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0025743619&partnerID=40&md5=3808eb8b8670f63d44bea261001e80f2
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/99185
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/99185
dc.identifier2-s2.0-0025743619
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1250967
dc.descriptionIntraobserver variation of three grading systems-Mostofi, Gleason and Böcking-is examined. No significant difference was noted between the histological grades found in the two examinations by any of the three methods used. Neither the type of surgical procedure nor the number of slices with tumour influenced the reproducibility of histological grading within each system studied. In the Gleason system the intraobserver highest disagreement would not have resulted in change of therapy choice, but in 2% of tumours graded according to the Mostofi system this would have occurred if the choice of therapy would depend on the grading results. © 1991 Akadémiai Kiadó.
dc.description23
dc.description5
dc.description449
dc.description454
dc.languageen
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers
dc.relationInternational Urology and Nephrology
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleHistologic Grading Of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Intraobserver Reproducibility Of The Mostofi, Gleason And Böcking Grading Systems
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución