dc.creatorDwyer T.
dc.creatorRaftery A.E.
dc.date1991
dc.date2015-06-30T14:08:56Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:41:25Z
dc.date2015-06-30T14:08:56Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:41:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:48:17Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:48:17Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierApplied Ergonomics. , v. 22, n. 3, p. 167 - 178, 1991.
dc.identifier36870
dc.identifier10.1016/0003-6870(91)90156-C
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0025854142&partnerID=40&md5=932cd7cb111a71d72d269a1bc66095cd
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/99131
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/99131
dc.identifier2-s2.0-0025854142
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1250825
dc.descriptionIndustrial accidents are produced by social relations work. This sociological explanation of accidents differs from the hypotheses on which the majority of modern safety practices are based, which reduce accident causes to unsafe acts and unsafe conditions. Accidents are seen as produced at each of three levels of social relations of work (rewards, command and organisation), and also non-socially at the individual-member level. The resulting hypotheses were tested using data collected according to a semi-experimental design in seven plants in which shift (day/night), shift type (rotating/fixed), technological type and management styles were the factors controlled for. Because of the design, machines, materials and, in most cases, workers were the same across shifts and social relations varied. The sociological theory proved capable of explaining most of the variation in inter-shift differences in accident rates, and, when tested statistically, appeared to have greater explanatory power than competing hypotheses. It is concluded that accidents can be prevented by workers who exercise auto-control at all levels and by management which, in the absence of worker orientations favourable to auto-control, engages in safety management as defined sociologically. A practical consequence for ergonomics is that when plant, equipment and processes are to be modified, an attempt to understand their interaction with the social relations of work should be made. A theoretical consequence is that sociological insights should be incorporated into the perspective of the ergonomics discipline. © 1991.
dc.description22
dc.description3
dc.description167
dc.description178
dc.descriptionAnon, Accidents (1977) Hazards Bull, 8 (7)
dc.descriptionAnon, The challenge — to find out why employees resist safety (1982) Automative, Tooling, Metalworking and Assoc Ind Newsletter, , September–October, 6
dc.descriptionBaker, Nelder, The GLIM system, Release 3. Generalized linear interactive modelling (1978) The GLIM system, Release 3, , Numerical Algorithms Group, Oxford
dc.descriptionBerlinguer, (1983) Medicina e politica, , CEBES-HUCITEC, Sao Paulo
dc.descriptionCaillard, A propos du facteur humain des accidents du travail: attitudes et securite (1976) Cahiers des Comites de prevention des batiments et des travaux publics, 6, pp. 280-282
dc.descriptionCarson, (1982) The other price of Britain's oil, , Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick
dc.descriptionCarter, Corlett, (1981) Shiftwork and accidents, , European Foundation for the Improvement of Working Conditions, Dublin
dc.descriptionCohen, Cleveland, Safety program practices in record-holding plants (1983) Professional Safety, 28 (3), pp. 26-33
dc.descriptionCollisson, Preventive medicine in industry (1964) Public Health Reports No 79, , US Public Health Service, Washington, DC
dc.descriptionCox, (1970) The analysis of binary data, , Chapman and Hall, London
dc.descriptionCuny, Problemes actuels de l'etude et de l'exploration des accidents du travail (1986) Le Travail Humain, 49 (2), pp. 99-102
dc.descriptionDavis, Ergonomics in the United Kingdom — Another crossroads (1983) Ergonomics, 26 (2), pp. 121-122
dc.descriptionDenzin, (1970) The research act, , Aldine, Chicago
dc.descriptionDwyer, (1981) Industrial accidents and nightwork in the manufacturing sector, , Department of Labour, Wellington, New Zealand
dc.descriptionDwyer, T. (forthcoming) Life and death at work: industrial accidents as a case of socially produced error. Plenum, New YorkEdwards, Scullion, (1982) Industrial accidents and industrial conflict, , Industrial Relations Research Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, (unpublished paper)
dc.descriptionEllis, A review of research on efforts to promote occupational safety (1975) J Safety Res, 7 (4), pp. 180-189
dc.descriptionFaverge, (1967) La psychosociologie des accidents du travail, , PUF, Paris
dc.descriptionFreilich, Mohawk heroes and Trinidadian peasants (1970) 1970. Marginal natives: Anthropologists at work, pp. 185-250. , M. Freilich, Harper and Row, New York
dc.descriptionGrand, Laurent, Quelques aspects humains des accidents du travail survenant sur les chantiers du gros oeuvre (1969) Archives des Maladies Professionelles, de Medecine du Travail et de Securite Sociale, 30 (1-2 –), pp. 13-24
dc.descriptionGrunberg, The effects of social relations of production on productivity and workers' safety: an ignored set of relationships (1983) Int J Health Services, 13 (4), pp. 621-634
dc.descriptionHaas, Learning real feelings â a study of high steel iron-workers' reactions to fear and danger (1977) Work and Occupations, 4 (2), pp. 147-170
dc.descriptionHagbergh-Olycksfall, Indiv-arbet och arbetsmilijo (1960) Paradets med, 23
dc.descriptionHale, Hale, (1972) A review of the industrial accident research literature, , HMSO, London
dc.descriptionHeinrich, (1959) Industrial accident prevention, , McGraw Hill, New York
dc.descriptionHill, Trist, Changes in accidents and other absences with length of service (1955) Human Relations, 8, pp. 121-152. , May
dc.descriptionHopkins, Blood money? The effect of bonus pay on safety in coal mines (1984) Journal of Sociology, 20 (1), pp. 23-46
dc.descriptionJohnson, Kotz, (1969) Discrete distributions, , Houghton-Mifflin, Boston
dc.descriptionde Keyser, Societe d'ergonomie de langue francaise (1984) Bulletin de Liaison, p. 32. , September, 3–5
dc.descriptionKletz, The shaking of the foundations (1980) Occupat Safety and Health, 10 (1), pp. 8-11
dc.descriptionKronlund, (1973) Pay system, production and safety: a study in a Swedish iron one mine, , Linkoping University, Linkoping, (unpublished paper)
dc.descriptionLeplat, Accident analysis and work analysis (1978) J Occupat Accidents, 1 (4), pp. 338-339
dc.descriptionLeplat, (1985) Erreur humaine, Fiabilite humaine dans le travail, , Armand Colin, Paris
dc.descriptionLindstrom, Sundstrom-Fisk, (1976) Unsafe behaviour in the felling operation: prevalence and influencing factors, , National Board of Occupational Safety and Health, Stockholm
dc.descriptionMason, The effect of piecework on accident rates in the logging industry (1977) J Occupat Accidents, 1 (3), pp. 289-294
dc.descriptionMcCullagh, Nelder, (1989) Generalised linear models, , 2nd edn, Chapman and Hall, London
dc.descriptionNeuloh, Ruhe, Graf, (1957) Der Arbeitsunfall une seine Ursachen. Ring
dc.descriptionPerrow, The organisational context of human factors in engineering (1983) Administrative Sci Q, 28, pp. 521-541. , December
dc.descriptionPerrow, (1984) Normal accidents, , Basic Books, New York
dc.descriptionPowell, Hale, Martin, Simon, (1971) 2000 accidents, , National Institute of Psychology, London
dc.descriptionQuinot, Moyen, (1980) Technique, risque et danger, , INRS, Paris
dc.descriptionRaftery, Akman, Bayesian analysis of a Poisson process with a change-point (1986) Biometrika, 73 (1), pp. 85-89
dc.descriptionRaymond, Cause des accidents du travail: le geste nefaste (1952) Archives des maladies professionnelles, 13 (5), pp. 449-453
dc.descriptionRinefort, A new look at occupational safety — a cost-benefit analysis of selected Texas industries (1977) Readings in industrial accident prevention, pp. 36-48. , D. Petersen, J. Goodale, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980
dc.descriptionRasmussen, Duncan, Leplat, (1987) New technology and human error, , Wiley, New York
dc.descriptionRogers, (1986) Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident, , Presidential Commission, Washington, DC, (Ch)
dc.descriptionSass, Crook, Accident proneness: science or non-science? (1981) Int J Health Services, 11 (2), pp. 175-190
dc.descriptionSchutz, (1967) The phenomenology of the social world, , Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Il
dc.descriptionShafai-Sharai, (1973) Determinants of occupational injury experiments, , Michigan State University Press, East Lansing
dc.descriptionSingleton, Accidents and the progress of technology (1982) J Occupat Accidents, 4, pp. 91-102
dc.descriptionSmith, The impact of OSHA inspections on manufacturing injury rates (1979) J Human Resources, 14 (2), pp. 145-170
dc.descriptionSmith, Colligan, Frookt, Tasto, Occupational injury rates among nurses as a function of shift schedule (1979) J Safety Res, 11 (4), pp. 181-187
dc.descriptionSolins, Une exploitation des statistiques nationales d'accidents du travail (1976) Revue economique, 27 (3), pp. 433-482
dc.descriptionTouraine, An historical study of the evolution of industrial skills (1962) 1972. Design of jobs, pp. 52-61. , L. Davis, J.C. Taylor, Penguin, Harmondsworth
dc.descriptionTouraine, Modernity and cultural specificities (1988) Int Soc Sci J, 40 (4), pp. 443-457
dc.descriptionTurner, Clack, Roberts, (1967) Labour relations in the motor industry, , Allen and Unwin, London
dc.descriptionUS Bureau of Labour Statistics, Improved productivity (1971) Bulletin No 1715, , United States Government Printing Office, Washington DC
dc.descriptionVernon, An investigation of the factors concerned in the causation of industrial accidents (1918) Health of Munition Workers Committee Memo No 21
dc.descriptionWatson, Does behaviour based safety management work? (1986) Professional Safety, pp. 20-25. , September
dc.descriptionWigglesworth, The fault doctrine and injury control (1978) J Trauma, 18 (12), pp. 789-794
dc.descriptionWisner, (1982) Vers une anthropotechnologie, , CNAM, Paris
dc.descriptionWisner, (1985) Quand voyagent les usines, , Syros, Paris
dc.descriptionWisniewski, Accidents mortel: sur les chantiers du batiment et des travaux publics dans la region Parisienne (1977) Cahiers des comites de prevention du batiment et travaux publics, 2, pp. 101-108
dc.languageen
dc.publisher
dc.relationApplied Ergonomics
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleIndustrial Accidents Are Produced By Social Relations Of Work: A Sociological Theory Of Industrial Accidents
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución