Brasil | Artículos de revistas
dc.creatorBigazzi G.
dc.creatorBonadonna F.
dc.creatorNeto J.C.H.
dc.date1986
dc.date2015-06-30T13:42:01Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:37:44Z
dc.date2015-06-30T13:42:01Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:37:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:42:12Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:42:12Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierInternational Journal Of Radiation Applications And Instrumentation. Part. , v. 11, n. 3, p. 123 - 136, 1986.
dc.identifier13590189
dc.identifier10.1016/1359-0189(86)90002-6
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-50849152697&partnerID=40&md5=4d2f8f1da24a8457d9cea0eb73a5af79
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/98401
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/98401
dc.identifier2-s2.0-50849152697
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1249248
dc.descriptionIn order to test the new statistical model proposed in two papers by McGee, Johnson and Naeser for calculating the standard error in fission track dating, spontaneous and induced track counts from external detector method-EDM-or similar were simulated by random numbers, assuming that, for a given uranium content, fission tracks were spatially distributed according to Poisson distributions. By the results of such a simulation it can be concluded that: 1. (1) In EDM, (1/nS + 1/nI)1 2 represents a reliable evaluation of the relative standard error of ρS/ ρI - ratio of spontaneous to induced track densities in a sample in which nS spontaneous and nI induced tracks were counted. 2. (2) The new model confirms the validity of the above conclusion, by applying it to the spontaneous and induced track counts whose relative standard deviations of the means were evaluated by normal sampling statistics. Population method-PM-data were also simulated; (σ'2 S + σ'2 I)1 2, where σ' S and σ'I are the above relative standard deviations of the mean, offers a reliable evaluation of the uncertainty of ρS/ρI ratio for the simple cases analyzed in the present work. © 1986.
dc.description11
dc.description3
dc.description123
dc.description136
dc.descriptionArias, Bigazzi, Bonadonna, Size corrections and plateau age in glass shards (1981) Nucl. Tracks, 5, pp. 129-136
dc.descriptionBardsley, Random errors in fission-track dating (1982) Math. Geol., 14, p. 545
dc.descriptionBeyer, (1980) Handbook of Mathematical Sciences
dc.descriptionBigazzi, Bonadonna, Ferrara, Datazione degli zirconi: confronto delle età ottenute con il metodo delle tracce di fissione e con il metodo 206Pb/238U (1976) Rend. Soc. Ital. Min. Petrol., 32, pp. 617-623
dc.descriptionBigazzi, Bonadonna, Ferrara, Innocenti, Fission track ages of zircons and apatites from Northern Apennines ophiolites (1973) Fortschr. Miner., 50, pp. 51-53
dc.descriptionBigazzi, Bonadonna, Radi, Fission track dating of obsidians and prehistory (1982) Fifth International Conference on Geochronology, Cosmochronology and Isotope Geology, pp. 1-4. , Nikko (Japan), Proc. Workshop on Fission-Track Dating
dc.descriptionBigazzi, Ferrara, Determinazione dell'età di zirconi con il metodo delle tracce di fissione (1971) Rend. Soc. Ital. Miner. Petrol., 27, pp. 295-304
dc.descriptionEvans, (1955) The Atomic Nucleus, , Tata McGraw-Hill, Bombay, New Delhi
dc.descriptionGalbraith, On statistical models for fission track counts (1981) Math. Geol., 13, pp. 471-478
dc.descriptionGalbraith, On statistical models for fission track counts: reply (1981) Math. Geol., 13, pp. 485-488
dc.descriptionGold, Armani, Roberts, Absolute fission rate measurements with solid-state track recorders (1968) Nucl. Sci. Engng., 34, pp. 13-32
dc.descriptionGreen, A new look at statistics in fission track dating (1981) Nucl. Tracks, 5, pp. 77-80
dc.descriptionGreen, A criticism of the paper entitled “A practical method of estimating standard error of age in the fission track dating method” by Johnson, McGee and Naeser (1981) Nucl. Tracks, 5, pp. 317-323
dc.descriptionGreen, In reply to Johnson, McGee and Naeser (1982) Nucl. Tracks, 6, pp. 56-57
dc.descriptionJohnson, McGee, Naeser, A practical method of estimating standard error of age in the fission track dating method (1979) Nucl. Tracks, 3, pp. 93-99
dc.descriptionJohnson, McGee, Naeser, Reply to P. F. Green's criticism of “A practical method of estimating standard error of age in the fission track dating method” (1982) Nucl. Tracks, 6, pp. 53-57
dc.descriptionKendall, Stuart, (1963) The Advanced Theory of Statistics, 1. , Griffin, London
dc.descriptionMcGee, Johnson, Statistical treatment of experimental errors in the fission track dating method (1979) Math. Geol., 11, pp. 255-268
dc.descriptionMcGee, Johnson, On statistical models for fission track counts: comment (1981) Math. Geol., 13, pp. 479-484
dc.descriptionSwinehart, Boellstorff, Age of Bishop tuff of Eastern California as determined by the fission-track method (1977) Comment. Geol., 5, pp. 648-650
dc.languageen
dc.publisher
dc.relationInternational Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleContribution To Statistics In Fission Track Counting
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución