dc.creatorSouza A.L.T.
dc.creatorGonzaga M.O.
dc.creatorVasconcellos-Neto J.
dc.date2007
dc.date2015-06-30T18:46:15Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:34:04Z
dc.date2015-06-30T18:46:15Z
dc.date2015-11-26T14:34:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T21:37:26Z
dc.date.available2018-03-28T21:37:26Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierEthology. , v. 113, n. 9, p. 856 - 861, 2007.
dc.identifier1791613
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1439-0310.2007.01384.x
dc.identifierhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34547963364&partnerID=40&md5=7a5eba40b359d5d160ccad378de03154
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/104690
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/104690
dc.identifier2-s2.0-34547963364
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1248004
dc.descriptionSome species of web building spiders use different capture tactics for different prey types. The main factors influencing the attack behaviour are the ability of the insect to escape, the risks of injury to the spiders and prey size. This study evaluated the effects of size and prey type on prey capture behaviour of the social spider Anelosimus eximius as influenced by the number of spiders attracted by prey movements that did not bite until the immobilization (bystanders) and the number of spiders that contributed to prey immobilization (catchers). We carried out a two-factor (prey size and type) experiment offering prey belonging to four orders: Diptera, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and Orthoptera, in a size gradient within each prey type. Both factors influenced the number of spiders recruited as bystanders, but only prey body size influenced the number of catchers in the subduing process. The possible advantages of the presence of bystanders around the interception site are discussed. © 2007 The Authors.
dc.description113
dc.description9
dc.description856
dc.description861
dc.descriptionAmir, N., Whitehouse, M.E.A., Lubin, Y., Food consumption rates and competition in a communally feeding social spider, Stegodyphus dumicola (Eresidae) (2000) J. Arachnol., 28, pp. 195-200
dc.descriptionAvilés, L., Causes and consequences of cooperation and permanent-sociality in spiders (1997) The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids, pp. 476-499. , In: Choe, J. Crespi, B., eds). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp
dc.descriptionBarnard, C.J., Sibly, R.M., Producers and scroungers: A general model and its application to captive flocks of house sparrows (1981) Anim. Behav., 29, pp. 543-555
dc.descriptionBox, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G., Hunter, J.S., (1978) Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis and Model Building., , Wiley, New York
dc.descriptionCaraco, T., Risk sensitivity and foraging groups (1981) Ecology, 62, pp. 527-531
dc.descriptionCaraco, T., Uetz, G.W., Gillespie, R.G., Giraldeau, L., Resource consumption variance within and among individuals: On coloniality in spiders (1995) Ecology, 76, pp. 196-205
dc.descriptionClark, C.W., Mangel, M., The evolutionary advantages of group foraging (1984) Theor. Popul. Ecol., 30, pp. 45-75
dc.descriptionEbert, D., Behavioral asymmetry in relation to body weight and hunger in the tropical social spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae, Theridiidae) (1998) J. Arachnol., 26, pp. 70-80
dc.descriptionGonzaga, M.O., Vasconcellos-Neto, J., Collective prey capture and feeding behaviours of Anelosimus jabaquara Levi 1956 (Araneae: Theridiidae) (2002) Behaviour, 139, pp. 573-584
dc.descriptionMcMahon, T.A., Bonner, J.T., (1986) Tamaño Y Vida., , Prensa Cientifica, Barcelona
dc.descriptionNentwig, W., Social spiders catch larger prey: A study of Anelosimus eximius (1985) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 17, pp. 79-85
dc.descriptionPasquet, A., Krafft, B., Cooperation and prey capture in a social spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae, Theridiidae) (1992) Ethology, 90, pp. 121-133
dc.descriptionPulliam, H.R., Caraco, T., Living in groups: Is there an optimal group size? (1984) Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, pp. 122-147. , In: 2nd edn (. Krebs, J. R. Davies, N. B., eds). Sinauer Associates Inc Publishers, Sunderland, MA, pp
dc.descriptionRanta, E., Peuhkuri, N., Laurila, A., Rita, H., Metcalfe, N.B., Producers, scroungers and foraging group structure (1996) Anim. Behav., 51, pp. 171-175
dc.descriptionRita, H., Ranta, E., Peuhkuri, N., Group foraging, patch exploitation time and the finder's advantage (1997) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 40, pp. 35-39
dc.descriptionRypstra, A.L., Foraging success of solitary and aggregated spiders: Insights into flock formation (1989) Anim. Behav., 37, pp. 274-281
dc.descriptionRypstra, A.L., Prey capture and feeding efficiency of social and solitary spiders: A comparison (1990) Acta Zool. Fenn., 190, pp. 339-343
dc.descriptionRypstra, A.L., Prey size, social competition, and the development of reproductive division of labor in social spider groups (1993) Am. Nat., 142, pp. 868-880
dc.descriptionRypstra, A.L., Tirey, R.S., Prey size, prey perishability and group foraging in a social spider (1991) Oecologia, 86, pp. 25-30
dc.descriptionSnedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G., (1989) Statistical Methods, , 8th edn. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA
dc.descriptionUetz, G.W., The ''ricochet effect'' and prey capture in colonial spiders (1989) Oecologia, 81, pp. 154-159
dc.descriptionVollrath, F., Rohde-Arndt, D., Prey capture and feeding in the social spider Anelosimus eximius (1983) Z. Tierpsychol., 61, pp. 334-340
dc.descriptionWard, P.I., Enders, M.M., Conflict and cooperation in the group feeding of the social spider Stegodyphus mimosarum (1985) Behaviour, 94, pp. 167-182
dc.descriptionWhitehouse, M.E.A., Lubin, Y., Competitive foraging in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola (1999) Anim. Behav., 58, pp. 677-688
dc.descriptionWilley, M.B., Jackson, R.R., Predatory of a social spider Stegodyphus sarasinorum (Araneae: Eresidae): why attack first? (1993) Can. J. Zool., 71, pp. 2220-2223
dc.languageen
dc.publisher
dc.relationEthology
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titlePrey Capture Behaviour In The Social Spider Anelosimus Eximius (araneae: Theridiidae): Responses To Prey Size And Type
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución